|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Sd or new 14060M | |||
| SD |
   
|
44 | 54.32% |
| 14060M COSC |
  
|
37 | 45.68% |
| Voters: 81. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
16 January 2008, 10:14 AM
|
#31 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Tony
Location: Buffalo
Watch: 16613 (blue dial)
Posts: 1,329
|
I would go for the SD. I prefer Subs with dates...
|
|
|
|
16 January 2008, 10:34 AM
|
#32 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Between those two, I'd go with the COSC 14060M. I think I'd take the chance it might be a short lived reference.
|
|
|
|
|
16 January 2008, 10:55 AM
|
#33 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Khanh
Location: Texas
Watch: SSGMTc
Posts: 1,227
|
Both are fine watches. I vote for the SD. But if you like the slimmer profile, go for the Sub Date. The date function is important to me. But pick what smiles at you. Life is short, so don't feel too bad when you flip.
|
|
|
|
|
16 January 2008, 10:58 AM
|
#34 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Grey
Location: NC
Posts: 268
|
Quote:
I think this will be the best bet if it is a keeper. If not buy either.
__________________
Best, -Grey |
|
|
|
|
|
16 January 2008, 01:18 PM
|
#35 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 203
|
your response prompts me to believe a price increase just occured, is that true? Why is the price no onger right?
|
|
|
|
|
16 January 2008, 01:29 PM
|
#36 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Richard
Location: LV, NV
Watch: LV Sub and others
Posts: 2,689
|
SD for my vote.
|
|
|
|
|
16 January 2008, 01:33 PM
|
#37 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Bill
Location: USA
Posts: 1,857
|
Can never go wrong with a rolex but SD is more practicle.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
16 January 2008, 01:58 PM
|
#38 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Joseph
Location: NORCAL
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 166
|
I'll go with 14060M, coz' that's what I got last christmas from my wife....LOVE U HONEY..
|
|
|
|
|
16 January 2008, 02:51 PM
|
#39 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
|
Also, IMO, it's the nicest looking Rolex sport for putting on a strap!
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches. 16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II, 2552.80 SMP |
|
|
|
|
16 January 2008, 03:10 PM
|
#40 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 49
|
14060m & I like better w/o cosc
|
|
|
|
|
16 January 2008, 03:11 PM
|
#41 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Mr. T
Location: anc/sfo
Watch: for the signs!
Posts: 776
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 January 2008, 03:19 PM
|
#42 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Vernon
Location: C-a-n-a-d-a
Watch: 16600
Posts: 5,641
|
SD Baptisman. Just suck it up and keep the SD
__________________
I'm just a cook... |
|
|
|
|
16 January 2008, 03:29 PM
|
#43 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Queensland, AUST
Posts: 2,003
|
I have owned the 14060M and I must say it was a beaut watch to look at and kept fantastic time:
 My Sea-Dweller is a little more bulkier, but it is not uncomfortable and it too is deadly accurate:   I do not regret getting the SD. The 14060M has now been modified by Rolex with the COSC and CRB, but we are yet to see at Basel 2008 what changes there will be to the 16600.....if any. Maybe they will discontinue it in which case I will have a collectors model $$$$$$! Cheers Steve |
|
|
|
|
16 January 2008, 04:48 PM
|
#44 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Joseph
Location: NORCAL
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 166
|
Steve, those are nice pics
|
|
|
|
|
16 January 2008, 10:45 PM
|
#45 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Queensland, AUST
Posts: 2,003
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
