Just came back from AD. GMT and Sub feels small and light.

[DrAlias]

Hi All TRFers, I tried a Sub and GMT just now. I feel its on the small and light , less substantial side albeit my small wrist ( 6.5 ins).
Those with experience on Explorer 11, pls give input as the feel and size of the Exp 11.
( my daily wear is Breit Super Ocean GMT, moving upwards to Rolex).
Any suggestions from TRFers as what should I get for my first Rolex.
TQ

[Nycturbovr6]

You should try on as many as you can and go with what sings to you most

[superdog]

Originally Posted by DrAlias

Hi All TRFers, I tried a Sub and GMT just now. I feel its on the small and light , less substantial side albeit my small wrist ( 6.5 ins).
Those with experience on Explorer 11, pls give input as the feel and size of the Exp 11.
( my daily wear is Breit Super Ocean GMT, moving upwards to Rolex).
Any suggestions from TRFers as what should I get for my first Rolex.
TQ

i'd like to see a wrist shot. for a relatively small wrist, i can't imagine how they can seem small. i think the 42mm Exp II would be hanging over both sides of your wrist.

granted the Breitling you mention is pretty big and they probably feel small in comparison. i think after a short time, they would no longer feel that way.

just my thoughts.

[padi56]

Originally Posted by DrAlias

Hi All TRFers, I tried a Sub and GMT just now. I feel its on the small and light , less substantial side albeit my small wrist ( 6.5 ins).
Those with experience on Explorer 11, pls give input as the feel and size of the Exp 11.
( my daily wear is Breit Super Ocean GMT, moving upwards to Rolex).
Any suggestions from TRFers as what should I get for my first Rolex.
TQ

Well with watches weight does not pay any attention to quality Rolex watches are quality no matter the weight. So the Sub for me and GMT are fine weight and size wise,and myself 6Ft 3 inches and have 8.5 inch plus wrists.

[MrNanni]

DSSD. Get one and you won't look back

[gas_electric]

Originally Posted by DrAlias

Hi All TRFers, I tried a Sub and GMT just now. I feel its on the small and light , less substantial side albeit my small wrist ( 6.5 ins).
Those with experience on Explorer 11, pls give input as the feel and size of the Exp 11.
( my daily wear is Breit Super Ocean GMT, moving upwards to Rolex).
Any suggestions from TRFers as what should I get for my first Rolex.
TQ

Have you tried the deepsea sea dweller? It's a hefty watch that might be up your alley. It's a tad pricer than the sub though.

[travisb]

The Exp2 is a very nice option. More substantial wrist presence yet very comfortable.
Wearing bigger watches (Panerai, AP ROO, or Breitling in your case) will always make a Rolex feel small. Unless you go the DSSD route...

[Urosfan]

Dr alias,

I have the same size wrist my sub lv fits fine on my wrist I tried the exp 2 also and it also fits well. I also wear panerai which is a 44mm and the fit is awesome. Good luck

[DrAlias]

Originally Posted by superdog

i'd like to see a wrist shot. for a relatively small wrist, i can't imagine how they can seem small. i think the 42mm Exp II would be hanging over both sides of

just my thoughts.

Here is the shot, hopefully it works.

[Billywiz]

Originally Posted by padi56

Well with watches weight does not pay any attention to quality Rolex watches are quality no matter the weight. So the Sub for me and GMT are fine weight and size wise,and myself 6Ft 3 inches and have 8.5 inch plus wrists.

I agree...I think you can sum it up as...comfortable

[Aarcher@McDGA]

I think the EXP II is an awesome watch. I have one as well as a Sea Dweller. They both wear a little different than the other but both are comfortable and have nice presence on a wrist.

My thought is that the EXP II would give you a completely different look than your Brietling or a Sub. This way you can change things up a bit.

BTW. I also have a Brietling that I never wear anymore since I got my EXP II.

[DrAlias]

Originally Posted by Aarcher@McDGA

I think the EXP II is an awesome watch. I have one as well as a Sea Dweller. They both wear a little different than the other but both are comfortable and have nice presence on a wrist.

My thought is that the EXP II would give you a completely different look than your Brietling or a Sub. This way you can change things up a bit.

BTW. I also have a Brietling that I never wear anymore since I got my EXP II.

Oh God!!!.... i wont be able to sleep till I have one of the Rolexes. Guys, tell me more about the joy of having a Rolexes....

[Urosfan]

The joy I got when I got my first rolex was like getting a kiss from a girl for the first time in my life lmao.

[Lion]

Everyone has their own opinion and make choices based on their likes and dislikes...but I do not see why "bigger is suppose to be better". I like the feel of Rolexes, regardless of size, and other fine quality time pieces over "Large Ones". Companies such as Rolex have been fine tuning and putting out high quality watches for decades.....

Too me I think these larger watches are a fad and eventually they will be "out of style" and then many will have watches too large.....of course many of them "are high quality" so they will be keepers(or flipped)and many will put them away for a decade or so till the next time the "Fad starts back up".....

Take it easy.....Leo

[landroverking]

Big and heavy is not always better.

[Vipes]

i have similar size wrists and I think the 40mm Rolex pieces feel substantial and well built. If you want more heft then consider the sea-dweller or deepsea. Then there is the WG sub which will have good heft to it.

[porschedude]

If the sub feels light buy a deep sea.

[Speed]

Buy what you like!

[Dr.Brian]

Just get an 18k Submariner, it'll be heavy enough for you.
Or just skip Rolex all together and go straight to AP or Panerai.

[SUBversive]

Back in the day you could special order your rolex by weight. Like at the meat counter.

[Watchdog]

Try the DSSD. Love it, but too top heavy for me.

Cheers!

[AK797]

Size wise feel -

Breitling SOSF - 44mm
DSSD - 43/4mm
EXP2 - 42/3mm
SubC - 42mm
Sub and Daytona - 40mm

Sub and Daytona are too small for me as I have a Breitling SOSF and I had a DSSD which wears very similar but was too top heavy and unbalanced for me, so I got a Subc which tho smaller is better balanced and lives happily with my Breitling. AP Diver also wears like a 44mm so would be perfect for you.

[skprd13]

Originally Posted by Lion

Everyone has their own opinion and make choices based on their likes and dislikes...but I do not see why "bigger is suppose to be better". I like the feel of Rolexes, regardless of size, and other fine quality time pieces over "Large Ones". Companies such as Rolex have been fine tuning and putting out high quality watches for decades.....

Too me I think these larger watches are a fad and eventually they will be "out of style" and then many will have watches too large.....of course many of them "are high quality" so they will be keepers(or flipped)and many will put them away for a decade or so till the next time the "Fad starts back up".....

Take it easy.....Leo

X2!

[powerband]

It's odd that many of us associate heft and quality.

I have owned many heavy watches, but their quality is only a fraction of that of the much lighter Rolex.

[Watchguy69]

Originally Posted by DrAlias

Hi All TRFers, I tried a Sub and GMT just now. I feel its on the small and light , less substantial side albeit my small wrist ( 6.5 ins).
Those with experience on Explorer 11, pls give input as the feel and size of the Exp 11.
( my daily wear is Breit Super Ocean GMT, moving upwards to Rolex).
Any suggestions from TRFers as what should I get for my first Rolex.
TQ

We have the same wrist size. Compared to the Sub and GMT2, the Explorer 2 is noticeably larger. I think Rolex joined the big watch bandwagon without going overboard, and it fits my wrist very well. I think the larger dial also makes the dial look cleaner, since the larger surface area spaces the dial features further apart. Lastly, you can't go wrong with either dial color, but the white face is pristine and very easy to read. I've included some wrist shots that I hope can be useful, including a shot of a 44mm Panerai. Cheers!

[redsubby]

If your wrist is truely 6.5, I don't see how the Sub and GMT can be small on your wrist.

[PunkJr]

A 40mm watch is a big watch for a 6.5" wrist, and any impression that you may have contrary to that is merely a state of mind. I wear a sub on my 8"+ wrist and it looks and feels fine.

[busytimmy]

I haven't read through this thread at all, but I have the Explorer II and SubC.
Even though the Explorer is larger in diameter, it wears more comfortable and less obtrusive (not that the SubC is heavy or obtrusive) than the SubC. It's lighter and flatter, which makes a big difference.

[Asdapuff]

If you like something that's heavier and bigger of the ss variety, try the DSSD. I love mine and it constantly gets admiring looks

[Linzjnr]

Originally Posted by Watchguy69

We have the same wrist size. Compared to the Sub and GMT2, the Explorer 2 is noticeably larger. I think Rolex joined the big watch bandwagon without going overboard, and it fits my wrist very well. I think the larger dial also makes the dial look cleaner, since the larger surface area spaces the dial features further apart. Lastly, you can't go wrong with either dial color, but the white face is pristine and very easy to read. I've included some wrist shots that I hope can be useful, including a shot of a 44mm Panerai. Cheers!

Those watches look HUGE on your wrist (awesome choices though) like others have said to the OP, just buy and wear what you like, good luck!