The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30 September 2013, 08:18 AM   #91
SLS
"TRF" Member
 
SLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
I think that in many circles there is no thought of what watch is worn with what outfit....but we all know better!
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin

Member No. 922
SLS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2013, 08:43 AM   #92
metallic
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Rick
Location: Ohio
Posts: 263
It depends on how you define dress watch. I think the traditional 35 mm hobnail Calatrava is dead, there is no appreciable market for them. Elegant watches on straps will never be dead however.
metallic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2013, 09:20 AM   #93
Widows Son
"TRF" Member
 
Widows Son's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hudson Ohio
Posts: 3,564
About the only time I get the chance to wear my dress watches are to Church and Lodge. I agree with the Watch Snob. People dress so poorly today how would anyone expect them to know what a true dress watch is anyway???
Widows Son is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2013, 09:42 AM   #94
sirjohnbrian
"TRF" Member
 
sirjohnbrian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PA
Watch: 'chu lookin' at???
Posts: 964
I have read some of the Watch Snob's articles. He is appropriately named. While having some accurate points, overall, I feel his world view is elitist.
__________________

"Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society." Mark Twain
"Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." Homer Simpson

SS Midsize DJ 68274 "L"
TT Jubilee DJ 116233 "Z"
Sea Dweller DS 116660 "V"
SS White Dial Daytona "V"
sirjohnbrian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2013, 10:00 AM   #95
QueueCumber
"TRF" Member
 
QueueCumber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Q
Location: The Q Continuum
Watch: ST:TNG
Posts: 8,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by sirjohnbrian View Post
I have read some of the Watch Snob's articles. He is appropriately named. While having some accurate points, overall, I feel his world view is elitist.
I think it is a comedy personality personally. It is too over the top to be a real person's point of view. I bet a few people write it, not just one person. Also, there have been conflicting view points over the course of the articles that lead me to believe it is more than one person as well.
QueueCumber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2013, 10:20 AM   #96
Widows Son
"TRF" Member
 
Widows Son's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hudson Ohio
Posts: 3,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by QueueCumber View Post
I think it is a comedy personality personally. It is too over the top to be a real person's point of view. I bet a few people write it, not just one person. Also, there have been conflicting view points over the course of the articles that lead me to believe it is more than one person as well.
I believe there are only two watch snobs who write the articles. Two very different styles.
Widows Son is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2013, 10:39 AM   #97
QueueCumber
"TRF" Member
 
QueueCumber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Q
Location: The Q Continuum
Watch: ST:TNG
Posts: 8,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Widows Son View Post
I believe there are only two watch snobs who write the articles. Two very different styles.
Maybe. At least two, perhaps more. There may be two main writers, but there may also be a team that sits around adding comedic things to the articles, sort of like how sitcoms are written.
QueueCumber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2013, 11:22 AM   #98
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by metallic View Post
It depends on how you define dress watch. I think the traditional 35 mm hobnail Calatrava is dead, there is no appreciable market for them. Elegant watches on straps will never be dead however.
I disagree.

It is rather the social norms that made a watch like the hobnail Calatrava a must-have in a gentleman's wardrobe that are dead or at least moribund.

There are still gentlemen in the world, just not so many as there once was and I'm not using the term gentleman as a synonym for a nice guy.

This watch would be more appropriate at a formal function than any watch in the Oyster line.

http://www.amazon.com/Seiko-SKP330-D...=dress+watches
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2013, 11:42 AM   #99
codecow
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Louis
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: PP 5131R
Posts: 5,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by QueueCumber View Post
I think it is a comedy personality personally. It is too over the top to be a real person's point of view. I bet a few people write it, not just one person. Also, there have been conflicting view points over the course of the articles that lead me to believe it is more than one person as well.
I also take the snide tone as comedy, however I think they're a bit serious with the opinions it's just the delivery that is comedic.
codecow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2013, 06:31 PM   #100
DreambreaX
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Rolex Estate
Posts: 1,304
yes its dead.

take a look at AP.

the one that sells is the ROO chrono collection. the Jules Audemars, Edward Piguet and Millenary is dead.
DreambreaX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2013, 07:29 PM   #101
zama
"TRF" Member
 
zama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Craig
Location: Sydney
Watch: 4 Broken glass
Posts: 5,808
Man I need to think more....... I have a mix of sports watches and dress watches and I just seem to wear watches........ I don't put enough thinking to it. What has stunnned me in this thread is the comment I wear business casual, therefore I can wear as big a watch as I like.....I am business casual but that means a long sleeve shirt, and the bigger the watch on my wrist the more it is annoying with or without a jacket.

Wear what makes you happy and if you are unhappy with ALS or PP dress watches I will happily send you a G Shock or even my ever fashionable Tudor Chrono to replace it.

I find my dress watches on leather straps immeasurably more comfortable my only complaint is their lack of lume since I wear them at night and have no other clock radio.

I suspect small watches and big watches will all have their time again.
__________________
Day Date 118206, Daytona 116509 & 116505, AP 25859ST
Gone but not forgotten and genuinely missed.....
Root Beer GMT, Sub, TT Daytona, YG DD Bark, Datejust(2 his & hers), AP RO, PP Aquanaut, Lange 1, Heuer Monza, Piaget Altiplano, GP Chrono, Seamaster, Tudor Sub, Tudor Chrono, Tudor Black Bay Bronze
zama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2013, 08:59 PM   #102
FeelingTheBlues
"TRF" Member
 
FeelingTheBlues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Carl
Location: Always moving
Watch: If you wish...
Posts: 22,039
I honestly don't mind people who wear sports watches with suits, whether it's a Submariner, a PO, a ROO or anything like those. Provided that the watch fits him well I for one believe they look versatile enough to be worn with fancier attires.

Still, I am a man who's much more into dress watches than sporty ones and I actually do the opposide, I will wear a thin, small gold watch on a leather band with jeans and a t-shirt. Back in the days one would have one watch for all occasions and since most of the watches would be smaller it wouldn't be out of place to see something like that happening. I can understand following what fashion dictates to a certain point (though I'm not doing that myself, I'm pretty bad at following what's in and out...) but this is a point I have to disagree with.

The dress watch isn't dead, it's popular among a certain group of people and I don't see that changing anytime soon. Different strokes for different folks.
__________________
Mon corps c'est un pays en guerre sur l'point d'finir,
Le général de l'armée de terre s'attend au pire,
J'ai faim, j'ai frette, je suis trop faible pour me lever debout,
On va hisser le drapeau blanc un point c'est tout.


- André Fortin
FeelingTheBlues is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2013, 09:59 PM   #103
How
"TRF" Member
 
How's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Melbourne
Watch: 16610, Tudor 1960
Posts: 1,554
Nothing says style and taste, like a fine dress watch.
How is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2013, 10:27 PM   #104
Rags
2024 Pledge Member
 
Rags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,196
Not for me it's not. I have my DJ as my dress watch & the others are for every day.
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust
16610 Z Serial Submariner
214270 Explorer

114300 Oyster Perpetual
76200 Tudor Date+Day
Rags is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2013, 02:38 AM   #105
OrangeSport
"TRF" Member
 
OrangeSport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 2,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott View Post
This watch would be more appropriate at a formal function than any watch in the Oyster line.

http://www.amazon.com/Seiko-SKP330-D...=dress+watches
Agreed!
__________________
OrangeSport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2013, 03:01 AM   #106
SixPak
"TRF" Member
 
SixPak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Phong
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,718
Quote:
Originally Posted by FeelingTheBlues View Post
I honestly don't mind people who wear sports watches with suits, whether it's a Submariner, a PO, a ROO or anything like those. Provided that the watch fits him well I for one believe they look versatile enough to be worn with fancier attires.

Still, I am a man who's much more into dress watches than sporty ones and I actually do the opposide, I will wear a thin, small gold watch on a leather band with jeans and a t-shirt. Back in the days one would have one watch for all occasions and since most of the watches would be smaller it wouldn't be out of place to see something like that happening. I can understand following what fashion dictates to a certain point (though I'm not doing that myself, I'm pretty bad at following what's in and out...) but this is a point I have to disagree with.

The dress watch isn't dead, it's popular among a certain group of people and I don't see that changing anytime soon. Different strokes for different folks.
Well said, Carl.
SixPak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2013, 03:30 AM   #107
rmfnla
"TRF" Member
 
rmfnla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Richard
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: TT DJ
Posts: 4,456
When I see someone in a tuxedo wearing a sports watch I cannot help but think, "There goes someone with only one watch"...
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
Lug Hole Lover®
rmfnla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2013, 05:14 AM   #108
QueueCumber
"TRF" Member
 
QueueCumber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Q
Location: The Q Continuum
Watch: ST:TNG
Posts: 8,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmfnla View Post
When I see someone in a tuxedo wearing a sports watch I cannot help but think, "There goes someone with only one watch"...
True. I think something like that too, and not something like, 'OMG! How dare you wear that with a suit.........'
QueueCumber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2013, 05:30 AM   #109
drchuck72
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Charles
Location: canada
Watch: Rolex 116520
Posts: 306
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmfnla View Post
When I see someone in a tuxedo wearing a sports watch I cannot help but think, "There goes someone with only one watch"...
If you saw me wearing a suit, you would be wrong. My problem, is one that is probably shared amongst many in this group. When I consider the value proposition of purchasing a watch, as much as I would love to have a proper dress watch, since I rarely dress to that level, I wouldn't really get to wear it that much and I invariably opt for another sport watch. You can see from my signature that I own more than one watch but if I were wearing suit, I would definitely be wearing a sports watch.

Hopefully one day, I will be able to acquire a dress watch. Of course, having spent so much time here, it will have to be a JLC, PP, VC or ALS. Such is the danger of hanging out with the aficionados.

And yes, I do feel a bit out of sorts when I wear the Sub with a suit now. 10 years ago, it was just fine but you all have ruined me!
__________________
Rolex 16610 and 116520|AP ROO Safari|Panerai PAM320|Omega Planet Ocean 8500|Breitling Chronomat Evolution|Tag Heuer Kirium F1 and Monaco|TW Steel Kivanc Edition
drchuck72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2013, 07:01 AM   #110
rmfnla
"TRF" Member
 
rmfnla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Richard
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: TT DJ
Posts: 4,456
Quote:
Originally Posted by drchuck72 View Post
If you saw me wearing a suit, you would be wrong. My problem, is one that is probably shared amongst many in this group. When I consider the value proposition of purchasing a watch, as much as I would love to have a proper dress watch, since I rarely dress to that level, I wouldn't really get to wear it that much and I invariably opt for another sport watch. You can see from my signature that I own more than one watch but if I were wearing suit, I would definitely be wearing a sports watch.

Hopefully one day, I will be able to acquire a dress watch. Of course, having spent so much time here, it will have to be a JLC, PP, VC or ALS. Such is the danger of hanging out with the aficionados.

And yes, I do feel a bit out of sorts when I wear the Sub with a suit now. 10 years ago, it was just fine but you all have ruined me!
Then, in your case it would be, "There goes someone with only one type of watch..."
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
Lug Hole Lover®
rmfnla is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.