ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Andykllhr · 18 October 2013, 05:27 AM

Hello all, I've only just got my 16610 and was after one for quite some time, but I have been playing with the glidelock clasp on my friends DSSD and really love it. I like the cyclops on my 16610 but can live without the date so my attention has been drawn to the 116610, I really like it, it did take me a while to get used to the oversize lugs but now I think they look alright. My question is this: what would I be looking at for a trade/part exchange for my mint M series 16610 box, no papers for a 114060, and would I be crazy to do this?
Any advice appreciated, cheers.

Sent from my iPhone

Kyle3130 · 18 October 2013, 06:08 AM

Not crazy, I would

Rags · 18 October 2013, 07:17 AM

As much as I love the 114060 I would never sell my 16610 sub. That's the problem with rolex for me I just can't bring myself to sell either one to get another. I'll just save till I get more cash for the next one that I want.

captkevin · 18 October 2013, 07:30 AM

Ever since I acquired my 116610LV, I've thought about that exact trade. I just have a hard time selling a discontinued Rolex, especially a 16610 which is an awesome piece and still my go to everyday wearer. I will still probably get the 114060, but will not sell a watch for it.

FTX I · 18 October 2013, 07:47 AM

I would do it

Rolexitis · 18 October 2013, 07:49 AM

I'm one of the biggest advocates for the 114060 and I love mine. However, you have a classic there and I wouldn't trade away the 16610 for it. BUT you have to do what your heart tells you. In the end, they are just watches and there are plenty available if you change your mind.

Jason71 · 18 October 2013, 07:49 AM

I wouldn't do it. The 16610 is classic.

Andykllhr · 18 October 2013, 08:00 AM

Thanks for the advice guys, if I could justify having both I would just buy the 114060, but with a ten week old son there are more important things to spend that kind of money on. Do you think I'll have to front up any cash to make the trade?

Sent from my iPhone

Hazelnut · 18 October 2013, 08:02 AM

That wouldn't be that bad of a trade! I would do it. But isn't the Glidelock on the DSSD a little different than the SubC? You might want to check it out first.

luvsub · 18 October 2013, 08:05 AM

I will do it.

Andykllhr · 18 October 2013, 08:12 AM

Yeah I think it's a little different but still solid, which is what I like, plus I swell up in the heat so a quick adjustment would be a bonus

Sent from my iPhone

Rolexitis · 18 October 2013, 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hazelnut

That wouldn't be that bad of a trade! I would do it. But isn't the Glidelock on the DSSD a little different than the SubC? You might want to check it out first.

Yes. 2 different set ups. But basically the same inside adjustment. The sub has to be taken off to adjust while the DS can be adjusted from the outside.

Rolexitis · 18 October 2013, 08:15 AM

You will love the 114060

Rolexitis · 18 October 2013, 08:15 AM

Enabling

Andykllhr · 18 October 2013, 08:27 AM

Yeah it is very very nice, probably will miss the 16610 though.

Sent from my iPhone

cop414 · 18 October 2013, 08:32 AM

If your 16610 isn't singing to you anymore and you really have no history with it then why not. I couldn't do it as I love the "old style" bracelet, clasp and lugs but that's just me.

mjclark32 · 18 October 2013, 08:55 AM

I wouldn't, love my 16610

Andykllhr · 18 October 2013, 08:57 AM

I love the lugs on the older one, and the SEL is vast improvement on the older 93150 bracelet (probably only in perception as the old one was just as strong and reliable). But the newer solid centre links and more solid clasp makes the newer subs bracelets more in keeping with the price tag. Just my opinion. My old 2531.80 seamaster's bracelet felt more in line with the price tag of the watch and that was a quarter the price of the 16610.
I'm not undermining the heavy oyster bracelet on the older subs as time and many years of use without failure have forged it as a true performer.
I just think that it should have more 'substance' for the price.

Sent from my iPhone

WARVET · 18 October 2013, 08:58 AM

Lots of old Subs out there. Trade to get what you want. The older I get the less I like the Cyclops

anothernewphone · 18 October 2013, 08:59 AM

You'll definitely be ponying up some cash to make the jump to the 114060. I'd imagine you'd have to drop at least a grand or two, USD.

Andykllhr · 18 October 2013, 09:03 AM

I have looked on the forums and there are a few 114060 owners that have traded in for a 16610 with little or no financial recompense, thought I may get lucky lol. I am just speculating about a trade, would need more time to consider, was just seeing what everyone else thought.

Sent from my iPhone

1William · 18 October 2013, 09:20 AM

Do the trade you will love the Sub-C ND. Great watch and all the upgrades.

Rolexitis · 18 October 2013, 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andykllhr

I have looked on the forums and there are a few 114060 owners that have traded in for a 16610 with little or no financial recompense, thought I may get lucky lol. I am just speculating about a trade, would need more time to consider, was just seeing what everyone else thought.

Sent from my iPhone

Yes but they traded down. You are wanting to trade up. Good luck. Check with some of the TRF sellers here. They may pm you after seeing your thread.

TAKUYA · 18 October 2013, 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rolexitis

Enabling

beautiful pic, Matt

Rolexitis · 18 October 2013, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by takuya

beautiful pic, Matt

Thanks buddy. Can't remember where I found that one.

Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2

polarinda · 18 October 2013, 11:58 AM

I would trade the sub for that sub.

Trouble15 · 18 October 2013, 12:14 PM

I'd do it.

eeh100773 · 18 October 2013, 12:25 PM

Another 'yes!' vote here.

mdtddd2007 · 18 October 2013, 12:44 PM

Keep the classic 16610. More balance....so what about the glide lock bracelet...not a big deal....if you really want to do it...go Hulk new model...no contest!!!

Betelc · 18 October 2013, 12:45 PM

I'm biased towards the 16610.

18 October 2013, 05:27 AM	#1
Andykllhr "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Real Name: Andy Location: Portsmouth,UK Watch: Sub 116610LN Posts: 147	Trade 16610 for 114060? Hello all, I've only just got my 16610 and was after one for quite some time, but I have been playing with the glidelock clasp on my friends DSSD and really love it. I like the cyclops on my 16610 but can live without the date so my attention has been drawn to the 116610, I really like it, it did take me a while to get used to the oversize lugs but now I think they look alright. My question is this: what would I be looking at for a trade/part exchange for my mint M series 16610 box, no papers for a 114060, and would I be crazy to do this? Any advice appreciated, cheers. Sent from my iPhone __________________ Sub 14060 W Series (sold) Sub 16610 M Series (sold) Sub 14060 A series (sold) Sub 114060 (sold) EXP II 216570 (Current)

18 October 2013, 06:08 AM	#2
Kyle3130 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: Oklahoma Posts: 1,960	Not crazy, I would __________________

18 October 2013, 07:17 AM	#3
Rags 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Chuck Location: SW Florida Watch: 16233,16610,214270 Posts: 11,196	As much as I love the 114060 I would never sell my 16610 sub. That's the problem with rolex for me I just can't bring myself to sell either one to get another. I'll just save till I get more cash for the next one that I want. __________________ 16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer *114300 Oyster Perpetual* *76200 Tudor Date+Day*

18 October 2013, 07:49 AM	#7
Jason71 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Jason Location: USA Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers Posts: 7,973	I wouldn't do it. The 16610 is classic. __________________ Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY

18 October 2013, 08:00 AM	#8
Andykllhr "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Real Name: Andy Location: Portsmouth,UK Watch: Sub 116610LN Posts: 147	Thanks for the advice guys, if I could justify having both I would just buy the 114060, but with a ten week old son there are more important things to spend that kind of money on. Do you think I'll have to front up any cash to make the trade? Sent from my iPhone __________________ Sub 14060 W Series (sold) Sub 16610 M Series (sold) Sub 14060 A series (sold) Sub 114060 (sold) EXP II 216570 (Current)

18 October 2013, 07:30 AM	#4
captkevin "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Florida Watch: Subs Posts: 689	Ever since I acquired my 116610LV, I've thought about that exact trade. I just have a hard time selling a discontinued Rolex, especially a 16610 which is an awesome piece and still my go to everyday wearer. I will still probably get the 114060, but will not sell a watch for it.

18 October 2013, 07:47 AM	#5
FTX I "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Flavio Location: N/A Posts: 14,654	I would do it

18 October 2013, 07:49 AM	#6
Rolexitis "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Real Name: Matt Location: Earth Watch: 114060 Posts: 3,203	I'm one of the biggest advocates for the 114060 and I love mine. However, you have a classic there and I wouldn't trade away the 16610 for it. BUT you have to do what your heart tells you. In the end, they are just watches and there are plenty available if you change your mind.

18 October 2013, 08:02 AM	#9
Hazelnut "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Real Name: David Location: Los Angeles Watch: SubC Date Posts: 242	That wouldn't be that bad of a trade! I would do it. But isn't the Glidelock on the DSSD a little different than the SubC? You might want to check it out first.

18 October 2013, 08:05 AM	#10
luvsub 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: SF, south bay Posts: 5,222	I will do it.

18 October 2013, 08:12 AM	#11
Andykllhr "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Real Name: Andy Location: Portsmouth,UK Watch: Sub 116610LN Posts: 147	Yeah I think it's a little different but still solid, which is what I like, plus I swell up in the heat so a quick adjustment would be a bonus Sent from my iPhone __________________ Sub 14060 W Series (sold) Sub 16610 M Series (sold) Sub 14060 A series (sold) Sub 114060 (sold) EXP II 216570 (Current)

18 October 2013, 08:15 AM	#13
Rolexitis "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Real Name: Matt Location: Earth Watch: 114060 Posts: 3,203	You will love the 114060

18 October 2013, 08:15 AM	#14
Rolexitis "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Real Name: Matt Location: Earth Watch: 114060 Posts: 3,203	Enabling Attached Images

18 October 2013, 08:27 AM	#15
Andykllhr "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Real Name: Andy Location: Portsmouth,UK Watch: Sub 116610LN Posts: 147	Yeah it is very very nice, probably will miss the 16610 though. Sent from my iPhone __________________ Sub 14060 W Series (sold) Sub 16610 M Series (sold) Sub 14060 A series (sold) Sub 114060 (sold) EXP II 216570 (Current)

18 October 2013, 08:32 AM	#16
cop414 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Tim Location: Pennsylvania Watch: 14060M Posts: 72,244	If your 16610 isn't singing to you anymore and you really have no history with it then why not. I couldn't do it as I love the "old style" bracelet, clasp and lugs but that's just me. __________________ Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED

18 October 2013, 08:55 AM	#17
mjclark32 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: MJC Location: PHL USA Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP Posts: 29,232	I wouldn't, love my 16610 __________________

18 October 2013, 08:57 AM	#18
Andykllhr "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Real Name: Andy Location: Portsmouth,UK Watch: Sub 116610LN Posts: 147	I love the lugs on the older one, and the SEL is vast improvement on the older 93150 bracelet (probably only in perception as the old one was just as strong and reliable). But the newer solid centre links and more solid clasp makes the newer subs bracelets more in keeping with the price tag. Just my opinion. My old 2531.80 seamaster's bracelet felt more in line with the price tag of the watch and that was a quarter the price of the 16610. I'm not undermining the heavy oyster bracelet on the older subs as time and many years of use without failure have forged it as a true performer. I just think that it should have more 'substance' for the price. Sent from my iPhone __________________ Sub 14060 W Series (sold) Sub 16610 M Series (sold) Sub 14060 A series (sold) Sub 114060 (sold) EXP II 216570 (Current)

18 October 2013, 08:58 AM	#19
WARVET "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: Vincent Location: Louisiana Watch: 16710 Coke Posts: 448	Lots of old Subs out there. Trade to get what you want. The older I get the less I like the Cyclops

18 October 2013, 08:59 AM	#20
anothernewphone Banned Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Bill Location: Plymouth Meeting Watch: 116520 Posts: 3,209	You'll definitely be ponying up some cash to make the jump to the 114060. I'd imagine you'd have to drop at least a grand or two, USD.

18 October 2013, 09:03 AM	#21
Andykllhr "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Real Name: Andy Location: Portsmouth,UK Watch: Sub 116610LN Posts: 147	I have looked on the forums and there are a few 114060 owners that have traded in for a 16610 with little or no financial recompense, thought I may get lucky lol. I am just speculating about a trade, would need more time to consider, was just seeing what everyone else thought. Sent from my iPhone __________________ Sub 14060 W Series (sold) Sub 16610 M Series (sold) Sub 14060 A series (sold) Sub 114060 (sold) EXP II 216570 (Current)

18 October 2013, 09:20 AM	#22
1William 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: North Carolina Watch: Rolex/Others Posts: 47,787	Do the trade you will love the Sub-C ND. Great watch and all the upgrades.

18 October 2013, 11:58 AM	#26
polarinda "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: Trav Location: singapore Watch: it Posts: 2,316	I would trade the sub for that sub.

18 October 2013, 12:14 PM	#27
Trouble15 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Real Name: Steve Location: USA Watch: A few Posts: 8,884	I'd do it.

18 October 2013, 12:25 PM	#28
eeh100773 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Real Name: "Fast" Eddie Location: Asbury Park NJ Watch: 14060 T Series '96 Posts: 1,482	Another 'yes!' vote here.

18 October 2013, 12:44 PM	#29
mdtddd2007 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: U.S Watch: Rolex, PP, AP, GS Posts: 5,785	Keep the classic 16610. More balance....so what about the glide lock bracelet...not a big deal....if you really want to do it...go Hulk new model...no contest!!!

18 October 2013, 12:45 PM	#30
Betelc "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Singapore Posts: 314	I'm biased towards the 16610.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)