ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Friedl41 · 31 October 2013, 07:51 AM

I can only get a "new" watch, if I let one go ...for a date just, silver or white dial

5013 .... Will never let it go
5500 Explorer (see 5013)
SD
GMT 2 DLC (see 5013)
GMT 2 (2012)
Pam 210
Pam 372
IWC Mark XII
IWC Der Fliegerchrono (JLC quarzmech movement)

Racerdj · 31 October 2013, 07:52 AM

My vote is for the one with the least wrist time.

salty_snack · 31 October 2013, 07:54 AM

PAM... your choice which one.

Dr. Robert · 31 October 2013, 07:54 AM

Panerai or IWC

Cc1966 · 31 October 2013, 08:10 AM

Pam take your pic.

Cru Jones · 31 October 2013, 08:45 AM

I could only bear to lose one of the IWCs.

Jack T · 31 October 2013, 08:51 AM

That is a very nice DJ you have in mind, I don't know enough about all the pieces in your collection, but I sure would make some room. I did not have to worry about my other watches getting in the way of choosing my DJ, but then it was only my second acquisition ! :) Good luck.

kieselguhr · 31 October 2013, 09:06 AM

The one you wear/care for/like the least

FTX I · 31 October 2013, 09:25 AM

Pam or and IWC

SLS · 31 October 2013, 09:44 AM

Of the list you gave, the Pam 210 is my least favorite. However, I could not see letting it go for a DJ.
Scott

BA211 · 31 October 2013, 10:02 AM

As someone said above, the one you wear the least. That is always my ultimate deciding factor.

jjnd08 · 31 October 2013, 10:16 AM

One of the IWC's

Presa canary · 31 October 2013, 10:37 AM

mark xii

Trouble15 · 31 October 2013, 10:40 AM

Pam

1William · 31 October 2013, 10:46 AM

210

Lucky777 · 31 October 2013, 10:58 AM

I would get rid of the one that sees the least amount of wrist time.

texex91 · 31 October 2013, 10:58 AM

Adios PAM.

vintagewaferthin · 31 October 2013, 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by racerdj

my vote is for the one with the least wrist time.

x2

Mastergreenhand · 31 October 2013, 11:06 AM

Both Pams

paverman · 31 October 2013, 11:29 AM

Pam

FrankNYC · 31 October 2013, 11:46 AM

PAM. I'm not a fan.

kh1970 · 31 October 2013, 12:03 PM

One of the PAMs

elcompa · 31 October 2013, 01:30 PM

Name: WellBye_zpsb4f41f86.jpg
Views: 98
Size: 44.1 KB

Bye Pan.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVrEwCa8nSA

Friedl41 · 31 October 2013, 08:03 PM

Thanks for the great advice ,,, the IWC won´t fetch enough ,,, the 210 i love, the 372 is beautiful, the gmts i love, the sd has many memories, the 5013 is holy to me ,,,

i better keep all of them and safe up :)

AK797 · 1 November 2013, 01:07 AM

Pams

31 October 2013, 07:51 AM	#1
Friedl41 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: SLF41 Location: Spain Watch: Changes Posts: 1,053	Which one should go? I can only get a "new" watch, if I let one go ...for a date just, silver or white dial 5013 .... Will never let it go 5500 Explorer (see 5013) SD GMT 2 DLC (see 5013) GMT 2 (2012) Pam 210 Pam 372 IWC Mark XII IWC Der Fliegerchrono (JLC quarzmech movement) Attached Images __________________ Sea Dweller 16600, Submariner 14060m SUB 5513 meter first (1968) Air King 5500 (1980) GMTc NR, Explorer 1 & II 14270 & 16570 PP 5065a

31 October 2013, 07:52 AM	#2
Racerdj 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Indianapolis Watch: Patek-Philippe Posts: 16,832	My vote is for the one with the least wrist time. __________________ Rolex and Patek Philippe

31 October 2013, 07:54 AM	#4
Dr. Robert 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Bob Location: U.S.A. Watch: 1655 Posts: 64,256	Panerai or IWC __________________ Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

31 October 2013, 08:10 AM	#5
Cc1966 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Christopher Location: Georgia, USA Watch: ing the Sea... Posts: 6,713	Pam take your pic. __________________ "I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way." Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778 "*Curmudgeons* " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc

31 October 2013, 08:51 AM	#7
Jack T "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: Jack Location: The Triangle Watch: Several Posts: 6,719	That is a very nice DJ you have in mind, I don't know enough about all the pieces in your collection, but I sure would make some room. I did not have to worry about my other watches getting in the way of choosing my DJ, but then it was only my second acquisition ! :) Good luck. Attached Images __________________ Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT

31 October 2013, 07:54 AM	#3
salty_snack Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: USA Posts: 365	PAM... your choice which one.

31 October 2013, 08:45 AM	#6
Cru Jones 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 35,299	I could only bear to lose one of the IWCs.

31 October 2013, 09:06 AM	#8
kieselguhr "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: Nick Location: Las Vegas Watch: 1601 Posts: 10,623	The one you wear/care for/like the least

31 October 2013, 09:25 AM	#9
FTX I "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Flavio Location: N/A Posts: 14,654	Pam or and IWC

31 October 2013, 09:44 AM	#10
SLS "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Scott Location: GMT -7 Watch: GMT's & Sub's Posts: 10,401	Of the list you gave, the Pam 210 is my least favorite. However, I could not see letting it go for a DJ. Scott __________________ "The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922

31 October 2013, 10:02 AM	#11
BA211 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: Jakarta Posts: 234	As someone said above, the one you wear the least. That is always my ultimate deciding factor.

31 October 2013, 10:16 AM	#12
jjnd08 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: United States Posts: 8,615	One of the IWC's

31 October 2013, 10:37 AM	#13
Presa canary "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Justin Location: Pa Watch: Explorer ii Posts: 3,155	mark xii

31 October 2013, 10:40 AM	#14
Trouble15 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Real Name: Steve Location: USA Watch: A few Posts: 8,883	Pam

31 October 2013, 10:46 AM	#15
1William 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: North Carolina Watch: Rolex/Others Posts: 47,776	210

31 October 2013, 10:58 AM	#16
Lucky777 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Real Name: Steve Location: NJ Watch: Rolex 16610 Posts: 2,160	I would get rid of the one that sees the least amount of wrist time.

31 October 2013, 10:58 AM	#17
texex91 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: . Posts: 17,898	Adios PAM.

31 October 2013, 11:06 AM	#19
Mastergreenhand "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Real Name: Tony Location: Chi-town Watch: Starbucks, Panerai Posts: 1,188	Both Pams

31 October 2013, 11:29 AM	#20
paverman "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Ken Location: Illinois Watch: Too many Posts: 2,870	Pam

31 October 2013, 11:46 AM	#21
FrankNYC 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: New York Watch: SubC & Red;JLC RDM Posts: 1,039	PAM. I'm not a fan.

31 October 2013, 12:03 PM	#22
kh1970 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Kyle Location: Virginia Watch: Changes often Posts: 266	One of the PAMs

31 October 2013, 01:30 PM	#23
elcompa "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: North Carolina Watch: DD 118206 Posts: 1,858	Bye Pan..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVrEwCa8nSA

31 October 2013, 08:03 PM	#24
Friedl41 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: SLF41 Location: Spain Watch: Changes Posts: 1,053	Thanks for the great advice ,,, the IWC won´t fetch enough ,,, the 210 i love, the 372 is beautiful, the gmts i love, the sd has many memories, the 5013 is holy to me ,,, i better keep all of them and safe up :) __________________ Sea Dweller 16600, Submariner 14060m SUB 5513 meter first (1968) Air King 5500 (1980) GMTc NR, Explorer 1 & II 14270 & 16570 PP 5065a

1 November 2013, 01:07 AM	#25
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,369	Pams

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)