ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Karbo · 29 March 2014, 03:38 AM

Looks like its not easy to answer. Lets say you could afford both but money is something you try to run wisely even if sometimes when you love you don't count !

SeaDweller50 · 29 March 2014, 03:41 AM

I'd like the new one personally.

mike · 29 March 2014, 03:48 AM

With the maxi dial and new clasp the new version would be my pick.

Cc1966 · 29 March 2014, 03:50 AM

New...mostly because of the bracelet/clasp.

Karbo · 29 March 2014, 03:50 AM

I think i will feel terribly alone on this poll lol

HogwldFLTR · 29 March 2014, 03:55 AM

Buy a 16600 and a 14060 for the price of an 116600. To me that makes sense in a new math sort of way. Put that in your Google and search it. But in truth a 116600 from a reliable seller comes close to the price you're quoting for a 16600.

JP Chestnut · 29 March 2014, 03:59 AM

I'm not sure $6k would but the 16600 I'd like. Correct and complete sets seem very hard to come by.

NukeMan · 29 March 2014, 03:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karbo

I think i will feel terribly alone on this poll lol

No! You have plenty of friends around!

Nathan_Barnes · 29 March 2014, 04:01 AM

The new 116600 will bring attention back to the 16600 as they are reviving a discontinuted model. The demand increase should help make them more saught after and I would jump at getting the 16600

Jason71 · 29 March 2014, 04:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karbo

I think i will feel terribly alone on this poll lol

Don't worry......I'm right there with you. To take your poll one step further.......I would buy a 1665 Great White for the same price as the new 116600

accce · 29 March 2014, 04:04 AM

116600. I already have 2 16600's.

Cru Jones · 29 March 2014, 04:05 AM

This is tough.... I need more time before choosing. But, by the time it will be possible to try the new SD, I would imagine the old will have increased in price by a good bit. Might make sense to grab the 16600 now?

Karbo · 29 March 2014, 04:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jason71

Don't worry......I'm right there with you. To take your poll one step further.......I would buy a 1665 Great White for the same price as the new 116600

JonnyDbailbonds · 29 March 2014, 04:08 AM

I am in the same boat.. I can't decide

Der Meister · 29 March 2014, 04:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cc1966

new...mostly because of the bracelet/clasp.

+1,

SaddleSC · 29 March 2014, 04:17 AM

New version...Glidelock + Matte Dial + 60 min Indexes on Bezel seals the deal for me.

bscepter · 29 March 2014, 04:40 AM

i prefer the older one, i guess. mainly for nostalgic reasons. but i'm glad they've offered a sensible alternative to the ridiculous deepsea.

subtona · 29 March 2014, 04:42 AM

I picked the new one...i have an order in for the new one...i have the old one and intend to keep both.

660ft · 29 March 2014, 04:43 AM

I would take the 1665 or the 16600 plus $4k cash for the next sub, but that's just me. I have to admit, the new SD is very nice.

Wesley Crusher · 29 March 2014, 04:44 AM

If money isn't an issue, I'd gladly take both, but if I had to chose one, it would be the 116600. The new clasps and bracelets are a big improvement over the older ones. I'm also a big fan of the maxi dial.

Karbo · 29 March 2014, 04:47 AM

Rolex marketers are lurking thats for sure hehe

red1108nyc · 29 March 2014, 04:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by subtona

I picked the new one...i have an order in for the new one...i have the old one and intend to keep both.

That's the perfect spirit buddy Gus! I share with you the same feeling!

Trouble15 · 29 March 2014, 04:50 AM

116610

herbalt · 29 March 2014, 04:50 AM

New version looks great. At that price though, I'd rather save more and go with something gold.

amvd · 29 March 2014, 04:54 AM

both great! if i had to choose it ll be the new one, love it,
many things make the difference, ceramic, clasp, etc
I hope to have one in the nearly future.

Karbo · 29 March 2014, 04:54 AM

Come on gus thought u were a lugholes ayatollah !!

subtona · 29 March 2014, 04:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by red1108nyc

That's the perfect spirit buddy Gus! I share with you the same feeling!

Fred, Look forward to having a pair on our wrists at the next get together

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karbo

Come on gus thought u were a lugholes ayatollah !!

I have betrayed myself, the matte dial & bezel put me over the edge ... Along with the refined case shape.

...i figure the 16600 will be on strap duty once its younger brother arrives

Solo118 · 29 March 2014, 05:31 AM

The sub to sub-c had a large price hike, so its in line.

Also keep in mind Rolex is planning a price hike on all watches, so do not be surprised if the $8500 sub-c became a $9500 sub-c and the SDc will just be $500-$1000 more.

That being said, if I had the funds available for such a watch, I would no doubt go for the new ceramic. It is easily my new favorite dive watch.

nickb732 · 29 March 2014, 05:39 AM

Just for the glidelock.

sco · 29 March 2014, 05:39 AM

Are we assuming both are BNIB? Makes a big difference...

View Poll Results: 116600 - 10K$ VS 16600 - 6K$
116600 - 10K$	243	51.37%
16600 - 6K$	230	48.63%
Voters: 473. You may not vote on this poll

29 March 2014, 03:38 AM	#1
Karbo "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: Paris, France Watch: Dayto/5164 Posts: 1,631	116600 - 10k$ vs 16600 - 6k$ Looks like its not easy to answer. Lets say you could afford both but money is something you try to run wisely even if sometimes when you love you don't count ! __________________ IG : @aka_karbo

29 March 2014, 03:50 AM	#4
Cc1966 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Christopher Location: Georgia, USA Watch: ing the Sea... Posts: 6,713	New...mostly because of the bracelet/clasp. __________________ "I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way." Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778 "*Curmudgeons* " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc

29 March 2014, 03:50 AM	#5
Karbo "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: Paris, France Watch: Dayto/5164 Posts: 1,631	I think i will feel terribly alone on this poll lol __________________ IG : @aka_karbo

29 March 2014, 03:55 AM	#6
HogwldFLTR 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Lee Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48 Watch: Too many to list! Posts: 33,697	Buy a 16600 and a 14060 for the price of an 116600. To me that makes sense in a new math sort of way. Put that in your Google and search it. But in truth a 116600 from a reliable seller comes close to the price you're quoting for a 16600. __________________ Troglodyte in residence! https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599

29 March 2014, 03:41 AM	#2
SeaDweller50 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Real Name: Sandy Location: England. Watch: 14060M 2 liner Posts: 3,204	I'd like the new one personally.

29 March 2014, 03:48 AM	#3
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	With the maxi dial and new clasp the new version would be my pick.

29 March 2014, 03:59 AM	#7
JP Chestnut Banned Join Date: May 2012 Location: Ann Arbor MI Watch: Rolex Ref 16600 Posts: 3,908	I'm not sure $6k would but the 16600 I'd like. Correct and complete sets seem very hard to come by.

29 March 2014, 04:01 AM	#9
Nathan_Barnes "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: N Location: Canada Watch: 116710LN Posts: 148	The new 116600 will bring attention back to the 16600 as they are reviving a discontinuted model. The demand increase should help make them more saught after and I would jump at getting the 16600

29 March 2014, 04:04 AM	#11
accce "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: Chevy Chase Watch: WG Daytona Posts: 1,088	116600. I already have 2 16600's.

29 March 2014, 04:05 AM	#12
Cru Jones 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 35,307	This is tough.... I need more time before choosing. But, by the time it will be possible to try the new SD, I would imagine the old will have increased in price by a good bit. Might make sense to grab the 16600 now?

29 March 2014, 04:08 AM	#14
JonnyDbailbonds "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Location: Virginia Posts: 9	I am in the same boat.. I can't decide

29 March 2014, 04:17 AM	#16
SaddleSC "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Charles B Location: GMT -7 Watch: Hulk 116610LV Posts: 6,131	New version...Glidelock + Matte Dial + 60 min Indexes on Bezel seals the deal for me. __________________ Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB

29 March 2014, 04:40 AM	#17
bscepter "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: Patrick Location: Omaha Watch: 16610 Submariner Posts: 948	i prefer the older one, i guess. mainly for nostalgic reasons. but i'm glad they've offered a sensible alternative to the ridiculous deepsea. __________________ 2009 16610 Submariner Date 1971 1601 Datejust 1966 Omega Seamaster 1965 Vulcain Voyager Chronograph

29 March 2014, 04:42 AM	#18
subtona "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: gus Location: East Coast Watch: APK & sometimes Y Posts: 26,602	I picked the new one...i have an order in for the new one...i have the old one and intend to keep both. __________________

29 March 2014, 04:43 AM	#19
660ft "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: LA Watch: 1680 Posts: 161	I would take the 1665 or the 16600 plus $4k cash for the next sub, but that's just me. I have to admit, the new SD is very nice.

29 March 2014, 04:44 AM	#20
Wesley Crusher "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Wes Location: Holosuite Posts: 6,345	If money isn't an issue, I'd gladly take both, but if I had to chose one, it would be the 116600. The new clasps and bracelets are a big improvement over the older ones. I'm also a big fan of the maxi dial.

29 March 2014, 04:47 AM	#21
Karbo "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: Paris, France Watch: Dayto/5164 Posts: 1,631	Rolex marketers are lurking thats for sure hehe __________________ IG : @aka_karbo

29 March 2014, 04:50 AM	#23
Trouble15 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Real Name: Steve Location: USA Watch: A few Posts: 8,884	116610

29 March 2014, 04:50 AM	#24
herbalt "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: United States Posts: 476	New version looks great. At that price though, I'd rather save more and go with something gold.

29 March 2014, 04:54 AM	#25
amvd "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Alejandro Location: uruguay Watch: your step! Posts: 430	both great! if i had to choose it ll be the new one, love it, many things make the difference, ceramic, clasp, etc I hope to have one in the nearly future.

29 March 2014, 05:31 AM	#28
Solo118 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: USA Watch: Daytona Posts: 6,092	The sub to sub-c had a large price hike, so its in line. Also keep in mind Rolex is planning a price hike on all watches, so do not be surprised if the $8500 sub-c became a $9500 sub-c and the SDc will just be $500-$1000 more. That being said, if I had the funds available for such a watch, I would no doubt go for the new ceramic. It is easily my new favorite dive watch.

29 March 2014, 05:39 AM	#29
nickb732 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Real Name: Nicholas Location: UK Posts: 2,630	Just for the glidelock. __________________ Nick

29 March 2014, 05:39 AM	#30
sco "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: Chicago Watch: Subc AT 8500 CSO Posts: 3,646	Are we assuming both are BNIB? Makes a big difference...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)