The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 June 2014, 10:10 PM   #91
MATCH1969
"TRF" Member
 
MATCH1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: PARIS
Watch: Vintage
Posts: 2,761
Quote:
Originally Posted by SAAS View Post
Very nice Heuers!
+1
MATCH1969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2014, 10:22 PM   #92
Cc1966
"TRF" Member
 
Cc1966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: ing the Sea...
Posts: 6,713
Don't think it's a bubble. The rise has been consistent, slow, and steady.
__________________

"I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way."
Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778
"Curmudgeons " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc
Cc1966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2014, 01:29 AM   #93
SAAS
"TRF" Member
 
SAAS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 548
The hobby is alive and well more people are able to participate than ever before

These watches where produced in a world where much of the global middle class or higher wealth was concentrated in the US/Developed Europe there were fewer wealthy people in general so fewer watches produced. Prices may have been lower but more people were worried about dinner in those days. While it saddens me that some watches are growing out of reach financially I think we can all agree more people having a higher quality of life is a good thing for everyone. More goods and services sold more opportunity.
SAAS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2014, 01:49 AM   #94
Shawnnyang
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Planet
Posts: 256
I don't think its a bubble either. I actually think vintage rolexes are UNDER valued at the moment.

1680s, 5513s, 1016s, 1675s, snowflakes, 1803s, 1603s can all be had for less than the cost of a modern Rolex. Think about that for a moment.

I'd aliken it to vintage muscle cars and their modern day equivalents. In most cases the vintage costs a whole hell of a lot more and we're talking about vehicles that have a much shorter shelf life than watches. The case is made even stronger when you consider that a modern rolex doesn't do anything better than a vintage rolex in terms of keeping time (the way a modern mustang can smoke the hell out of a 68'). So all you have is a diminishing supply and an increasing demand (a 70s sub is never going out of style). I don't see any bubble bursting any time soon.

I'm going to purchase the quintessential vintages in the best conditions that I can find in the next year or so and just enjoy the shit out of them for the next 50 years. Otherwise, I fear that I'll never be able to justify spending THAT much for a watch.

I'd bet good money that in 10 years time, there is no way in hell you'd be able to buy a quality vintage for the price of a modern rolex.
Shawnnyang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2014, 02:21 AM   #95
Kingface66
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kingface66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: Many
Posts: 3,462
Yeah, I'm thinking this is not a bubble at all. As a corollary, in the mid-90s, when I was living in DC where I grew up, a guitar store called Southworth had an incredible collection of '58 - '60 Les Paul sunbursts. They were going for around $30,000 ea. And insane amount of money that we assumed was a bubble that would have to burst soon.

Now, 20 years later, they're worth $300,000 or more.

At the time, I wish....prayed!...I had that kind of cash, but it was simply out of the question. Would I spend $300,000 on one now? Besides not being able to, and even AFTER I saw the increase, a part of me believes the prices must be at their peak. So, no.
And yet....another part of me can see them being worth a million in ten years.

So, yeah, I brought a gilt dial 5513 last year for more money than I'm fully comfortable with...but, not entirely UNcomfortable with....and, I'm feeling very confident that this was a wise investment.
Kingface66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2014, 02:45 AM   #96
Shawnnyang
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Planet
Posts: 256
Dude ..... so glad to see someone shares my own anxiety. LOL I think part of my post is just trying to justify my own recent purchase. Time will tell.
Shawnnyang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2014, 05:29 AM   #97
steptoe
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: london, uk.
Posts: 250
Quote:
Originally Posted by QCASANOVA View Post
I was just pointing out that having a cool vintage watch just isn't as exclusive as it once was and since there are more buyers (due to the new fad/trend of wearing vintage) the prices are rising as the supply is diminishing.

:
What do you mean "having a cool vintage watch isn't as exclusive as it once was".
There are still only the same amount of vintage watches, they haven't increased production .
steptoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2014, 10:26 AM   #98
lhanddds
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Watch: of course
Posts: 8,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark020 View Post
Heuers have appreciated considerably in the last 5 years. Nice Monaco or Siffert is USD 10k as well. Part of my collection:





Nice ones you have there


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
lhanddds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2014, 12:22 PM   #99
Tudor Fan
"TRF" Member
 
Tudor Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 983
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnBaker3 View Post
+1

Amazingly, the vintage Rolex market may be the ONLY market out there that ISN'T manipulated by the boys on Wall Street...

...well, who's bonuses do you think are buying those over $100k vintage Daytonas and $50k big crowns? Same with classic cars. Last year the best performing investment sector of them all. Vintage watches and cars, art from established artists, precious metals, high end real estates are all forms of hedging agains the looming economic collapse...

Until that happens prices - all prices - will go up. After, all bets are off.
Tudor Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2014, 12:24 PM   #100
Tudor Fan
"TRF" Member
 
Tudor Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingface66 View Post
Yeah, I'm thinking this is not a bubble at all. As a corollary, in the mid-90s, when I was living in DC where I grew up, a guitar store called Southworth had an incredible collection of '58 - '60 Les Paul sunbursts. They were going for around $30,000 ea. And insane amount of money that we assumed was a bubble that would have to burst soon.

Now, 20 years later, they're worth $300,000 or more.

At the time, I wish....prayed!...I had that kind of cash, but it was simply out of the question. Would I spend $300,000 on one now? Besides not being able to, and even AFTER I saw the increase, a part of me believes the prices must be at their peak. So, no.
And yet....another part of me can see them being worth a million in ten years.

So, yeah, I brought a gilt dial 5513 last year for more money than I'm fully comfortable with...but, not entirely UNcomfortable with....and, I'm feeling very confident that this was a wise investment.
I tend to agree but hope it is not wishful thinking on my part....
Tudor Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2014, 02:44 PM   #101
Cortezthekiller
"TRF" Member
 
Cortezthekiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 234
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tudor Fan View Post
...well, who's bonuses do you think are buying those over $100k vintage Daytonas and $50k big crowns? Same with classic cars. Last year the best performing investment sector of them all. Vintage watches and cars, art from established artists, precious metals, high end real estates are all forms of hedging agains the looming economic collapse...

Until that happens prices - all prices - will go up. After, all bets are off.
Indeed, as equity bubbles inflate so go the collectible markets. Unfortunately on the other side, collectibles are much less liquid and are usually sold at a deep loss in trying times. Rough for those late to the game or cash poor.
__________________
Rolex 16753 Rootbeer GMT, 16803 Submariner
Accutron Swiss Spaceview N3
Movado Astronic HS360 01.0010.436
Omega Flightmaster 145.036, 145.012 Speedmaster
Enicar Sherpa Guide MKII
Cortezthekiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2014, 11:13 PM   #102
Tudor Fan
"TRF" Member
 
Tudor Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cortezthekiller View Post
Indeed, as equity bubbles inflate so go the collectible markets. Unfortunately on the other side, collectibles are much less liquid and are usually sold at a deep loss in trying times. Rough for those late to the game or cash poor.
True.
Tudor Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 June 2014, 01:03 PM   #103
MILGAUSS88
"TRF" Member
 
MILGAUSS88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: mississippi river
Posts: 3,194
Rolex was never suppose to be an "affordable" watch.
10 years ago a new sub listed for $4,000 and you could buy vintage for $2,000 - $3,000 and no crown guards for $4,000.
Now list for a new sub is $8,500. You can buy vintage for $3,500 to $6,000, still under new model prices. No crown guards can be had for $8,000 - $10,000 if not a large crown.
Roughly same ratio of price with the new watch 10 years ago.
Everything has become inflated, except for our pay.
MILGAUSS88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 June 2014, 05:33 PM   #104
Mark020
"TRF" Member
 
Mark020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,133
NCG for 8-10k? Don't see a lot of them :-)
Mark020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 June 2014, 10:47 PM   #105
jfmiii
"TRF" Member
 
jfmiii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16750/16800/126710
Posts: 1,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by MILGAUSS88 View Post
Rolex was never suppose to be an "affordable" watch.
10 years ago a new sub listed for $4,000 and you could buy vintage for $2,000 - $3,000 and no crown guards for $4,000.
Now list for a new sub is $8,500. You can buy vintage for $3,500 to $6,000, still under new model prices. No crown guards can be had for $8,000 - $10,000 if not a large crown.
Roughly same ratio of price with the new watch 10 years ago.
Everything has become inflated, except for our pay.
pls point me in the direction of a NCG Sub for $10k......
jfmiii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 June 2014, 11:29 PM   #106
HERITAGE82
"TRF" Member
 
HERITAGE82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by steptoe View Post
What do you mean "having a cool vintage watch isn't as exclusive as it once was".
There are still only the same amount of vintage watches, they haven't increased production .
I understand your point in regards to the quantity of watches available. However, what I meant was that at one point I could go a very long time without seeing someone with a vintage watch on, and now I see vintage watches strapped to people's wrists quite frequently. Therefore, actually wearing a cool vintage watch is not as exclusive as it once was due to the high # of people wearing them.
__________________
- Rolex Explorer - 214270
- Tudor Black Bay - 79230B
- Tudor Chronograph - 79270P
- Breitling Chronomat - 10th Anniv.
- Huguenin Freres Speedmaster Prototype
HERITAGE82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 June 2014, 04:02 AM   #107
Tudor Fan
"TRF" Member
 
Tudor Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 983
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfmiii View Post
pls point me in the direction of a NCG Sub for $10k......
Me too, please.
Tudor Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 June 2014, 05:56 AM   #108
QueueCumber
"TRF" Member
 
QueueCumber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Q
Location: The Q Continuum
Watch: ST:TNG
Posts: 8,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark020 View Post
NCG for 8-10k? Don't see a lot of them :-)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfmiii View Post
pls point me in the direction of a NCG Sub for $10k......
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tudor Fan View Post
Me too, please.
He'll show you, but you have to dig 6 feet to get them....
__________________
Instagram: _queuecumber_
QueueCumber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2014, 02:58 AM   #109
Maxbliss888
"TRF" Member
 
Maxbliss888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Hong kong
Posts: 50
The demand are for those sports models. You can still find bargains for those Smaller non-sports models...
Maxbliss888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2014, 03:18 AM   #110
Karbo
"TRF" Member
 
Karbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Paris, France
Watch: Dayto/5164
Posts: 1,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
Once the Mainland China market gets a taste for vintage Rolex in the way they have had for new Rolex in the last decade or so, all bets will be off.
Lol
Time to buy then
__________________
IG : @aka_karbo
Karbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2014, 03:35 AM   #111
Karbo
"TRF" Member
 
Karbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Paris, France
Watch: Dayto/5164
Posts: 1,631
Its not a bubble and Prices will raise to the sky for one simple reason :
Every year a small % of vintage 5513,1665 etc... are getting destroyed and lost.
1% a year ? So 10% in 10 years of the stock will desapear
Less products on the market and more demand
__________________
IG : @aka_karbo
Karbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2014, 05:04 AM   #112
locutus49
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
Hilarious TV reference. Well played.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
You might think that. I can't possibly comment.
locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2014, 05:08 AM   #113
locutus49
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
A significant percentage of vintage Rolexes are Frankenwatches or outright fakes, and the owners do not even realize it. Musician John Mayer collects them and bought several Franken-vintages from a well known dealer whom he trusted and with whom he had a long relationship. And Mayer reportedly has solid knowledge of vintages. He is currently suing the dealer. Be careful out there.
locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2014, 07:20 AM   #114
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by locutus49 View Post
A significant percentage of vintage Rolexes are Frankenwatches or outright fakes, and the owners do not even realize it. Musician John Mayer collects them and bought several Franken-vintages from a well known dealer whom he trusted and with whom he had a long relationship. And Mayer reportedly has solid knowledge of vintages. He is currently suing the dealer. Be careful out there.
Thank you John. I didn't realize that a significant number of the vintage Rolex watches are fake or cobbled-togethers. I'll heed your advice! What per cent would you say are fakes and frankens?
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2014, 08:24 AM   #115
stmoore
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: US
Watch: Gilt
Posts: 1,592
Lol.
stmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2014, 08:34 AM   #116
locutus49
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
If your comment is meant as sarcasm, you should know that there are likely people on this forum who think they own genuine vintage watches. I hope everyone's watch is authentic. But you never know. My post was meant kindly, and for the new buyers.

Museums - every art museum - have a basement with fakes that they once thought were authentic, until newer technology could disauthenticate them. And all these works of art were at one time considered genuine by experts. My source for this is Art News and my own experience.

So even experts can be fooled. Like I said, be careful. If it does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you. But new buyers entering the vintage market may not be so knowledgeable. Google the subject if you doubt me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
Thank you John. I didn't realize that a significant number of the vintage Rolex watches are fake or cobbled-togethers. I'll heed your advice! What per cent would you say are fakes and frankens?
locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2014, 08:46 AM   #117
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by locutus49 View Post
If your comment is meant as sarcasm, you should know that there are likely people on this forum who think they own genuine vintage watches. I hope everyone's watch is authentic. But you never know. My post was meant kindly, and for the new buyers.

Museums - every art museum - have a basement with fakes that they once thought were authentic, until newer technology could disauthenticate them. And all these works of art were at one time considered genuine by experts. My source for this is Art News and my own experience.

So even experts can be fooled. Like I said, be careful. If it does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you. But new buyers entering the vintage market may not be so knowledgeable. Google the subject if you doubt me.
I fail to see any "sarcasm" in my reply. You paint a picture with a broad brush, doom and gloom, because of a few fake vintage Rolex watches that show up every now-and-then. I don't care what you collect, there will be criminals and fraudsters jumping at the chance to separate you from your hard earned cash and unload some junk on you. This is not a new phenomenon, since con artists have been around for thousands of years.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2014, 10:49 AM   #118
locutus49
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
So I was wrong to caution new vintage buyers about frankenwatches and fakes? Do we encourage them and later, when they proudly display their new vintage, point out the flaws?

Someone is buying the myriad faux Rolexes on ebay. It may seem like a few to you, but seems like a lot a inauthentic Rolexes are on the market to me. Again, search on John Mayer and Rolexes to see how even experienced collectors can be fooled.

How can you argue against a polite caution to new buyers? I'll leave this thread, and let the readers decide how to buy vintage watches. I hope they are cautious and careful. But it is up to them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
I fail to see any "sarcasm" in my reply. You paint a picture with a broad brush, doom and gloom, because of a few fake vintage Rolex watches that show up every now-and-then. I don't care what you collect, there will be criminals and fraudsters jumping at the chance to separate you from your hard earned cash and unload some junk on you. This is not a new phenomenon, since con artists have been around for thousands of years.
locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2014, 12:47 PM   #119
QueueCumber
"TRF" Member
 
QueueCumber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Q
Location: The Q Continuum
Watch: ST:TNG
Posts: 8,466
We are the Borg. You will be assimilated. Your biological and technological distinctiveness will be added to our own.
__________________
Instagram: _queuecumber_
QueueCumber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2014, 02:46 PM   #120
sennheiserz
"TRF" Member
 
sennheiserz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Dave
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Watch: ♛ + Ω +
Posts: 601
I'm really happy this has been posted as I feel it is the most important debate in vintage Rolex today.

I've always loved watches since I was very young, and I arguably still am having recently turned 30. In the last handful of years I have be fortunate enough to have some disposable income to spend on this hobby, so I began to buy, and sell, and buy again. I was mostly interested in newish watches as I didn't know much about vintage and wanted to make sure I was wearing something I could truly rely on.

However the vintage stuff began to captivate me: the plexiglass crystals, the different shades of patina, silver date wheels, open 6's and 9's and all the different types of history of the buyers and the time they were made. So recently I totally changed my collecting strategy, selling anything I had that was new and I didn't have significant attachment to, in order to focus on vintage.

Simply put, I know I can buy any of the new models for the next few decades, but I feel we are in the last stages of being able to ever own the classic models from the 60s and 70s without the kind of investment I know I won't be comfortable with, especially for something so easily broken, stolen or damaged through the years.

That said, I wouldn't buy them if I didn't truly love them and want to WEAR them every day. Do I consider them a form of an investment? Well, I guess you could ask my savings account that. But one of the great thing about any Rolex is that it is a way to park money while enjoying it every day.

Would I cash out my 401k in order to pick up a some serious vintage pieces? Even if it might be a much better investment in the long run, I absolutely would not. Part of this hobby is understanding the opportunity cost, the fact that each time you choose a new piece, it means all the others will have to wait. Its part of the fun and chase. This is especially pertinent in vintage watches where there is a real possibility they will be much more expensive by the next time you have saved up again.

But there is another part of this hobby I've begun to understand which I find to be an important part of it. ThomasPP once said to me,
Quote:
"Don’t be too aggressive with your budget. If you overspend and worry too much about the money, you won’t enjoy it as much as you should."
He's absolutely right. Enjoy what you have while you have the time to. I bet art collectors in the mid-20th century were annoyed that they could no longer afford decent Picasso's for their own collection. Now it seems incredible anyone could have these hanging on their dining room walls.

Fine watches are becoming no different, except you can enjoy them during every part of your day. The older ones are of course more rare, and to some more beautiful, but at the end of the day most of us get enjoy some of each, old and new. For how much longer who knows, I'm not looking to find out, which is why I'm placing emphasis on them now.

Picasso loved his Pateks:
__________________
My Watch Blog - http://www.wristtimes.com

Collection: Rolex Sub NDc 114060 | Omega SMP 861 | Apple Watch SS
sennheiserz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.