ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 July 2014, 10:58 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
New Porsche Macan Crossover Vehicle..
|
3 July 2014, 11:06 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Judy
Location: Ontario
Watch: 116234 - 14060M
Posts: 4,607
|
Nice little SUV...Not happy with the price, but not all together surprised at the amount of add ons. LOL
Thanks for posting. :-) |
3 July 2014, 11:14 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Real Name: Raky
Location: Houston, TX
Watch: Blue Sky-Dweller
Posts: 442
|
Always loved Porsche's and hope to have a 911 in the next few years. Bought my wife a 2011 X3 this past December and depending on the reviews, in 3-4 years a nice CPO Macan is a likely replacement.
|
3 July 2014, 11:17 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
This gives people not familiar with Porsches an idea of how much options cost. You can double the price of a plain jane 911 with enough options.
I'd like to see a Macan in person. I'm more of a 911 guy myself, but for someone with kids, it could be the ticket. |
3 July 2014, 11:29 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Evan Card
Location: Danbury, CT
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 1,525
|
Cool ride. Hard to get around me (in CT) right now... Waitlisted for sure.
|
4 July 2014, 12:18 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
|
There's only one heaven . . . . 911 ;)
Miss mine too HAGOne |
4 July 2014, 12:29 AM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,303
|
Nice & sporty Q5.
I dunno, for Porsche, I would want a 911/Cayman/Boxster, but, to each their own. |
4 July 2014, 01:17 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Gotham
Posts: 9,641
|
Thought this was gonna be Porsche's cheapest car, I like the look of it. They normally release the S version first. And the S is cheaper than the Boxster S. But their website now has the non-S for £40k(237bhp) and S for £43k. (340bhp). Surprised by the bhp difference and prices.
|
4 July 2014, 01:53 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
|
I haven't driven one yet but I guess it is a 'small' Porsche
The new Cayenne isn't that big either . . . Used to driving a Range Rover I know . . . English rubbish But until today not one problem Just my .02 HAGOne |
4 July 2014, 02:08 AM | #10 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,009
|
Perfect little SUV for my wife.
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
4 July 2014, 02:33 AM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Soly
Location: UK/US
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 3,089
|
I think it's kinda small. We have 2 kids so it won't work. I am thinking more the new Range Rover sport.
|
4 July 2014, 03:12 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
|
4 July 2014, 05:54 AM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,355
|
I was at the launch party held by my dealer. It's a cool car but I thought I would like it better. The back end is a bit disappointed aesthetically to my eye.
Either way there is no disputing the turbo is a rocket.
__________________
|
4 July 2014, 05:58 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Matt
Location: Northern VA
Watch: 126711, 126610
Posts: 1,803
|
Seen them here; look almost identical to an Audi Q5, save some massaged body lines.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.