ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
11 September 2014, 01:43 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 11
|
Will Smart Watch like Apple take over Rolex in luxury market segment?
Apple is a well known brand like Rolex. After seeing Apple Watch with so many customize template, I'm sure it wouldn't take long to see a classic Submariner dial appear on an Apple watch. There might be an third party apps that you can download into your smart watch along with all the Rolex classic dials plus matching hands. With the correct programming, the second hand can either run 8 beat per second or customize to a smooth sweeping motion.
The Swiss watch industries do not feel the Apple Watch will take over their market segment. To me, it feels like RIM, Nokia or Motorola failed to response with a new product to compete with Apple before it's too late. I think the younger generation will love tech stuff more. As they grow older, they perceive Apple or other vintage smart watch has a higher value than an old inaccurate analog watch. Our Rolex collections may soon be a paper weight in the next three generations. Who knows? |
11 September 2014, 01:49 PM | #2 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
|
Not even close. Apple boondoggle imho. The one I own is just plain annoying (MetaWatch).
|
11 September 2014, 01:52 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Owie
Location: MNL/SFO
Watch: G-Shock DW003
Posts: 1,504
|
Nope..
__________________
|
11 September 2014, 01:54 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: planet rolex
Posts: 1,728
|
You must be joking
|
11 September 2014, 01:57 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: West Palm Beach
Posts: 252
|
I don't know about mechanical watches, but Apple will probably snag some of the digital watch segment.
|
11 September 2014, 01:59 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,120
|
Lol what a silly question.
This is a nice photos which demonstrates why that won't happen.
__________________
newb watch collector |
11 September 2014, 02:00 PM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
|
i'll buy one to compliment my iphone and apps etc. but not replace my rolex watch. the upper $2k range swiss makers need not worry just yet.
if i were a quartz lcd company like suunto or a citizen and invicta, i may be worried. but really, who knows? one things for sure, if you have an iphone, you're probably going to buy an iwatch if you're a watch person or not. |
11 September 2014, 02:13 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: So-Cal USA
Posts: 1,067
|
I'd consider the Apple Watch a convenience item, not a luxury item. So, no is my answer to your question.
__________________
116710LN 116300blro |
11 September 2014, 02:21 PM | #9 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
|
But it will come in gold... Truthfully can you imagine a gold 1st generation iPhone, how valuable that would be?...melted for only its gold value.
|
11 September 2014, 02:31 PM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Very Far Away
Posts: 579
|
I think in time the "younger generation" is going to get tired of never escaping from computer screens and computer interfaces, and embrace old analog technology. They will do this because so much computerware is soulless crap, and they will want to be different from the masses. It will become a new type of cool.
|
11 September 2014, 02:45 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Matthew
Location: Miami/NY
Watch: the shoes.
Posts: 3,482
|
No. But they have potential to easily take up market share of digital watches.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
11 September 2014, 02:49 PM | #12 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 6,124
|
Quote:
|
|
11 September 2014, 02:52 PM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 2,886
|
People are dumb that is all
|
11 September 2014, 02:56 PM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 246
|
This watch is a fad - like those google glasses. It will be over soon. These tech companies are running out of ideas so they are producing trash to see what sticks. As far as overtaking Rolex, yes it will happen ... it will happen the day when a a gold fish will be able to attack and kill a killer whale...
|
11 September 2014, 03:01 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 283
|
That is not a watch.
|
11 September 2014, 03:16 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 385
|
Never. Two very different markets
|
11 September 2014, 03:19 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Steve
Location: Burbank, CA
Watch: 214270 Mark II
Posts: 4,121
|
Who wants a watch that you'd have to remember to charge nearly every single day??
|
11 September 2014, 03:25 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 5,417
|
No
|
11 September 2014, 03:47 PM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Phoenix
Watch: GMT Master II
Posts: 227
|
Quote:
I wouldn't bet on that. $350 for a watch that will be obsolete in a year, needs to be charged every night and tethered to your iPhone. Don't see the attraction for anyone except fan boys and geeks. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
11 September 2014, 04:13 PM | #20 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,300
|
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
11 September 2014, 04:18 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Middle
Posts: 878
|
|
11 September 2014, 04:28 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Saudi Arabia
Posts: 186
|
Claude Biver says it perfectly...
http://www.businessinsider.com/jean-...ampaign=buffer Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
11 September 2014, 04:38 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
|
Smart watches are competing with smart phones more than they are luxury mechanical watches because the iwatch requires the iphone to function and some people will simply not choose to have the watch when anything it can do is available on the phone they already must have anyway. And once they become independently functional they have a real problem because due to their size limitations (screen size and being able to cram as much electronics into a way smaller package) they will likely never be able to perform like the phone. Electronic sophistication aside, Just the screen size is a big obstacle. In case you haven't noticed, cell phone keep getting bigger - even Apple followed the market on this instead of leading it. It's tough to find even a 4" screen in a higher end phone anymore.
A Rolex is an aspirational purchase, something a smart watch will never be. Let's keep in mind that a Rolex is not an entry level time piece and is rarely the first watch a person buys. To the extent that smart watches get more young people to start wearing watches, it will be a good thing in the long run for the prestige brands. And BTW, I think some underestimate just how many young people still aspire to have a nice car, a big house, and a Rolex. I'm talking about kids that have plans to accomplish things in their lives, and there are a great many of them.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints. |
11 September 2014, 04:51 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: San Diego
Posts: 195
|
No way that the apple watch is going to take over Rolex.
Just think about it..Rolex has been around for more than a century and during that time, it has seen so many technological gadgets come and go. And Rolex is still as strong as ever. I believe Rolex is not even battling an eyelid over Apple watch. |
11 September 2014, 04:56 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
Thay are not in the same segment. BTW I will never go near an iwatch, or whatever it will be called.
|
11 September 2014, 04:58 PM | #26 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Larry
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 25,662
|
Will Smart Watch like Apple take over Rolex in luxury market segment?
Never.
__________________
✦ 28238 President DD 18K/YG ✦ 16610LN SS Sub ✦ 16613 18K/SS Serti ✦ 16550 Exp II Non-Rail Cream Dial ✦ Daytona C 116500 ✦ 126710 BLRO GMT-Master II ✦ NEXT-->? ⛳ Hole In One! 10/3/19 DMCC 5th hole, par 3, 168 yards w/ 4-Iron. |
11 September 2014, 05:02 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,120
|
__________________
newb watch collector |
11 September 2014, 05:18 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Sydney, HK
Watch: BB58 Blue
Posts: 471
|
I might buy one, but I will probably not wear it as often as intended.
Maybe a good watch to go travelling, and pretty much that's all.
__________________
Patek Philippe | Audemars Piguet | Vacheron Constantin | Rolex | Tudor | Grand Seiko | Baume & Mercier | Bamford London | Studio Underd0g | Swatch x Omega | Swatch x Blancpain | Casio |
11 September 2014, 05:46 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Real Name: David
Location: Sydney
Watch: Daytona & Sub C
Posts: 206
|
I find it somewhat ironic that the "old fashioned", older technology, mechanical watch has a longer power reserve than the latest technology has to offer.....
|
11 September 2014, 05:50 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Suisse
Posts: 411
|
What a question...
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.