ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
23 September 2014, 10:38 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mount Vernon, WA.
Watch: Rolex 1655
Posts: 9
|
Advice on the Sea Dweller 4000
Howdy
Back in '81 I wanted a Rolex so I walked into a jewelers in Albuquerque NM and purchased, for a mind boggling amount of money, at the time, a watch that cost me well over $900. I didn't know anything about Rolex but the guy behind the counter said he'd give me a good deal on this one in the corner. It was an Explorer II 1655 (1978) and it looked durable and nice, so I bought it. From that day on it became a part of my wrist. Wasn't until the last 10 years or so that I found that that particular model was actually worth more than I bought if for. That discovery was a breath of fresh air. But what I'm now interested in is the Sea-Dweller 4000. I saw a few that were black and I kind'a liked that look, although, SS could also be the direction I could go. My question(s) are, what makes the "4000" different from past models? What is "ceramic" on this watch and why? How many models of Sea Dwellers are there and is the "4000" the only recent model? Any info and suggestions are appreciated. Thanks Jeffrey L. |
23 September 2014, 04:01 PM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
Welcome
|
23 September 2014, 07:03 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Welcome Jeffrey
The current SD has a ceramic ('Cerachrom') bezel insert, so it is not actually a ceramic watch as such. Please take a look in the reference section www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=343896 as this has a lot of good info about the SD and many other models.
__________________
|
23 September 2014, 10:25 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,372
|
Welcome
|
24 September 2014, 06:29 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mount Vernon, WA.
Watch: Rolex 1655
Posts: 9
|
Thanks all for your hospitality.
I really like the Deep Sea Dweller. Just wondering if it's submersion depth is inside or outside the sub? If so, why in either case...what's the point? Also, would it be correct to assume this is the most durable of all the Rolex watches, i.e. able to take the most abuse anywhere on the planet? |
24 September 2014, 02:32 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
Welcome!
__________________
Instagram: @Hairdude Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238 16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped) Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018 |
24 September 2014, 04:26 PM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 6,124
|
Welcome to TRF. The rolex reference library is where you need to be heading.
Clive, up above, gave you some good data and link. So do you still have your ExpII 1655? |
24 September 2014, 05:27 PM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,759
|
Welcome Jeffrey, you can't go wrong with the SD4000
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
24 September 2014, 06:48 PM | #9 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Quote:
All/most steel sport watches will be pretty durable. Some would argue that the Exp II (216570) is likely the most durable as it does not have a rotating bezel i.e. something that could malfunction. Quote:
Thanks!
__________________
|
||
24 September 2014, 08:34 PM | #10 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,006
|
Welcome!
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
25 September 2014, 05:20 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mount Vernon, WA.
Watch: Rolex 1655
Posts: 9
|
Quote:
It would be great to be able to have both watches (1655 & 116660) but I don't think it's financially feasible at this moment in time. I'm truly amazed at how many watches many of you have in your "collections". Thanks again everyone for the constructive feedback. Jeffrey L. |
|
25 September 2014, 12:37 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Margaritaville
Posts: 3,639
|
Welcome to TRF!
__________________
After reading all posts, I agree with Adam! |
12 October 2014, 02:37 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,136
|
The SD4000 is a very nice watch indeed. You will probably find that it wears a bit bigger though than your 1655 Explorer which as you will now gathered, is most sought after as a collectors item. You would be crazy to get rid of it - hold it and wait a while longer for the SD4000. Good luck!
|
12 October 2014, 03:08 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Welcome!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.