ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
5 January 2015, 09:34 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Blue Planet
Watch: 5
Posts: 1,201
|
2014 - the year of the bigger watch
With 2014 now behind us I was just looking back at my purchases and sales of the last year and got to realise how my purchasing habits had changed in 12months .
I had flirted with a larger watch in the past ( 43mm Omega AT ) my mainstay collection however was 40-41mm ( DD, AP, SD ) I started going large again in January trading my 41mm AP for a 42mm SKYDWELLER. Having sold the SD in late 2013 I also aimed for a bigger diver in an 45mm Omega PO XL. The love affair with the latter didn't last however and I snapped up a 42mm 216570, alas that stayed with me a whole 5 months before I traded it for a 43mm SDDS. Struggling to find THE watch I traded that for a 42mm Pelagos and put a bit of money towards an AP 44mm Novelty. Having for the most part sold them on I sit today with a 41mm 15400 and DD2. The SKYDWELLER is boxed and ready to trade with a smaller 40.5 ?? and I stand in the verge of having my ultimate trio. In owning numerous watches from a 36mm DJ to a 44mm Novelty it's finally sunk in that I don't need bigger size watches anymore. I have defended bigger watches against the traditionalists and dismissed the trend as something that is here to stay. I'm less sure about that now. i still respect anyone's choices but for those lusting after a big watch I would suggest they take a step back and ask if 40mm is so small after all. My journey has only been a year long but I reckon the end is now here and I have found the perfect size for me. |
5 January 2015, 09:38 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
Welcome to enlightenment
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
5 January 2015, 09:39 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
Have to agree with the novelty factor bigger heavier is better, which in the real world is not always the case,unless you are one of those stereo typed.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
5 January 2015, 09:43 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: The Bay
Posts: 182
|
There's nothing nicer than a reasonably sized watch.
|
5 January 2015, 09:45 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
|
36-40mm, with a reasonable weight is king.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. |
5 January 2015, 10:29 PM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Patek-Philippe
Posts: 16,832
|
I actually downsized slightly from the 44mm Breitlings to my 40-42mm current collection.
__________________
Rolex and Patek Philippe |
5 January 2015, 10:30 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: N/A
Posts: 679
|
|
5 January 2015, 11:02 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
|
OK...so what is the ultimate trio?
|
5 January 2015, 11:05 PM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,301
|
good for you for finding what works for you.
|
5 January 2015, 11:08 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Singapore
Posts: 618
|
40-42 is the best.
|
5 January 2015, 11:21 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Halifax, Canada
Posts: 415
|
It drives me nuts when I look into a good tool/dive watch and find out its 44 or worse. I find 42mm too big in some thicker cases, would much rather have 36mm (my 1625) than a 42mm although I find 38-40 (my 1625) is just right. I'm glad there has been less of the huge movement in dress watches, I find my 34mm Connie looks bigger than the 36mm Turn-O-Graph when they are on the wrist (due to the flatness of the Connie I guess).
|
5 January 2015, 11:49 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: MD
Watch: 6605
Posts: 470
|
After owning some of the bigger sizeed Omega's, Breitling's, & kobold. I have also come back to the 36-42mm range. Only reason I include 42mm is the Exp. II which I do like but it's as big as I'll go in the future. Also thickness was something I used to like, but now don't want anything thicker than my 16600. I have one 44mm watch left & I think it's going to partially fund a white dial datejust in the next few months for a good daily that goes with anything.
__________________
6605 TT 16800 matte 16700 coke 16628 blue Breitling Avenger Ti |
5 January 2015, 11:53 PM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,126
|
Thank you for sharing. I suppose the ideal watch size depends largely on wrist size, and what you are wearing the watch for: dress, casual etc.
For me 40 mm is the perfect size for my 7.25" wrist. |
6 January 2015, 12:07 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
|
6 January 2015, 12:13 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Home
Posts: 1,438
|
40mm is definitely the best size. With the new case design of the sub ceramic it's the biggest I'd want to go. Perfect larger case due to the lugs but still at 40.
For me anywhere between the Daytona 40 and sub c 40 is perfect. Just my own two cents.
__________________
Royal Oak 15500ST Master Calendar METEORITE Q1552540 | Luminor GMT PAM 00335 Aquanaut 5167A-001 | Nautilus 5712/1A-001 Cosmograph DAYTONA 116520 | DEEPSEA 126660 | Explorer 214270 | GMT Master II BLRO 16710 | GMT Master II VTNR 126720 | Submariner LV 16610 | Sky-Dweller 326139 | Prince Oysterdate 90630 |
6 January 2015, 12:26 AM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,514
|
I am 40-44mm fan. Love em.
__________________
|
6 January 2015, 12:27 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Ron
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: 116233
Posts: 3,180
|
With my 36mm DJ and 40mm GMTII I feel I have what's best for me. As with all watch issues/concerns, it comes down to what pleases you.
__________________
so many Rolexes.....so little time |
6 January 2015, 12:44 AM | #18 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
It's never been about size for me. Rather what looks nice.
|
6 January 2015, 12:56 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,137
|
My go to references are getting smaller and smaller. As much as I loved the YMII, it's 44 mm size was a bit too large to be honest.
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous |
6 January 2015, 01:10 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: London UK
Watch: Daytona,GMT's,1680
Posts: 283
|
Same for me, having downsized from Panerais and Breitlings. 40mm is the perfect size - legible but not too bulky on the wrist.
|
6 January 2015, 01:12 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ATL
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 683
|
I've got to agree with what others have said-the larger watches (above 40mm) are not for me. Given my size, anything above 40 looks cartoonish on me, in my opinion.
It's strange how much bigger a 40mm Sub seems after I've worn one of my 36mm DJ for a week or two straight, but I still like the combo of my 36 and 40mm pieces. Different styles/sizes for the circumstances. |
6 January 2015, 02:54 AM | #22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
|
6 January 2015, 03:10 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Scott
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,307
|
It all depends on what you like. If you like big, wear them. If you prefer smaller, wear them. Doesn't really matter what anyone else thinks or what is trending. As long as you are happy and confident about what's on your wrist, that's all that matters.
__________________
Waiting for Arrival... Omega Seamaster 120 Automatic Luminox 3950 Orange Luminox Field Watch Day-Date Casio G-Shock Analog/Chrono |
6 January 2015, 03:11 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
__________________
|
6 January 2015, 03:18 AM | #25 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
|
39-42mm I've learned is my sweet spot.
|
6 January 2015, 03:28 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,695
|
damn right travis especially for rolex and Ap those are my fav sizes
__________________
PP Geneva |
6 January 2015, 03:33 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Great Plains
Watch: Exp II 216570 Blk
Posts: 1,190
|
There is no universal optimal size - it's a matter of personal preference. It's a you-say-poh-tato-I-say-pah-tato type of thing.
|
6 January 2015, 03:52 AM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
36-47
|
6 January 2015, 03:53 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Dan
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Watch: Sub LV
Posts: 678
|
I stopped in the local AD over the weekend, and since the Rolex counter was too crowded (two people putting down orders for DeepSea blue's!) I was looking at Omegas. The Speedmasters were nice. Then the guy showed me their diving watch (Seamaster??) -- it was ginormous! Seemed like an inch thick. Who could wear a watch like that? Next to my lovely GMT it just looked silly.
I know, to each their own and some people like big watches. Just not my cup of tea... -Dan |
6 January 2015, 04:09 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PNW
Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2
Posts: 8,123
|
My daily wear vary from 40-43mm in size. I wear 44mm watches when/where I like and appropriate. For me, it's how it looks nice on me and not about the size of the watch.
I continue to wonder when someone says the big size watches are a novelty. If not mistaken, IWC, Breitling, Panerai, to mention a few companies that have been in business a while, have been making big size watches for more than a bit. So, I don't see where novelty applies. Just my opinion, however. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.