The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5 January 2015, 09:34 PM   #1
RXAPPP
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Blue Planet
Watch: 5
Posts: 1,201
2014 - the year of the bigger watch

With 2014 now behind us I was just looking back at my purchases and sales of the last year and got to realise how my purchasing habits had changed in 12months .

I had flirted with a larger watch in the past ( 43mm Omega AT ) my mainstay collection however was 40-41mm ( DD, AP, SD )

I started going large again in January trading my 41mm AP for a 42mm SKYDWELLER. Having sold the SD in late 2013 I also aimed for a bigger diver in an 45mm Omega PO XL. The love affair with the latter didn't last however and I snapped up a 42mm 216570, alas that stayed with me a whole 5 months before I traded it for a 43mm SDDS. Struggling to find THE watch I traded that for a 42mm Pelagos and put a bit of money towards an AP 44mm Novelty.

Having for the most part sold them on I sit today with a 41mm 15400 and DD2. The SKYDWELLER is boxed and ready to trade with a smaller 40.5 ?? and I stand in the verge of having my ultimate trio.

In owning numerous watches from a 36mm DJ to a 44mm Novelty it's finally sunk in that I don't need bigger size watches anymore. I have defended bigger watches against the traditionalists and dismissed the trend as something that is here to stay. I'm less sure about that now. i still respect anyone's choices but for those lusting after a big watch I would suggest they take a step back and ask if 40mm is so small after all. My journey has only been a year long but I reckon the end is now here and I have found the perfect size for me.
RXAPPP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2015, 09:38 PM   #2
Jason71
"TRF" Member
 
Jason71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
Welcome to enlightenment
__________________
Best Regards,
Jason


Just Say "NO" to Polishing
Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons
LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches
PLEXI IS SEXY
Jason71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2015, 09:39 PM   #3
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Have to agree with the novelty factor bigger heavier is better, which in the real world is not always the case,unless you are one of those stereo typed.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2015, 09:43 PM   #4
Blubaru
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: The Bay
Posts: 182
There's nothing nicer than a reasonably sized watch.
Blubaru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2015, 09:45 PM   #5
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
36-40mm, with a reasonable weight is king.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
bayerische is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2015, 10:29 PM   #6
Racerdj
2024 Pledge Member
 
Racerdj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Patek-Philippe
Posts: 16,832
I actually downsized slightly from the 44mm Breitlings to my 40-42mm current collection.
__________________
Rolex and Patek Philippe
Racerdj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2015, 10:30 PM   #7
wdin
"TRF" Member
 
wdin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: N/A
Posts: 679
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason71 View Post
Welcome to enlightenment
this
wdin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2015, 11:02 PM   #8
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
OK...so what is the ultimate trio?
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2015, 11:05 PM   #9
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,301
good for you for finding what works for you.
Cru Jones is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2015, 11:08 PM   #10
Mezz72
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Singapore
Posts: 618
40-42 is the best.
Mezz72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2015, 11:21 PM   #11
dexvd
"TRF" Member
 
dexvd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Halifax, Canada
Posts: 415
It drives me nuts when I look into a good tool/dive watch and find out its 44 or worse. I find 42mm too big in some thicker cases, would much rather have 36mm (my 1625) than a 42mm although I find 38-40 (my 1625) is just right. I'm glad there has been less of the huge movement in dress watches, I find my 34mm Connie looks bigger than the 36mm Turn-O-Graph when they are on the wrist (due to the flatness of the Connie I guess).
dexvd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2015, 11:49 PM   #12
rc51matt
"TRF" Member
 
rc51matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: MD
Watch: 6605
Posts: 470
After owning some of the bigger sizeed Omega's, Breitling's, & kobold. I have also come back to the 36-42mm range. Only reason I include 42mm is the Exp. II which I do like but it's as big as I'll go in the future. Also thickness was something I used to like, but now don't want anything thicker than my 16600. I have one 44mm watch left & I think it's going to partially fund a white dial datejust in the next few months for a good daily that goes with anything.
__________________
6605 TT
16800 matte
16700 coke
16628 blue
Breitling Avenger Ti
rc51matt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2015, 11:53 PM   #13
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,126
Thank you for sharing. I suppose the ideal watch size depends largely on wrist size, and what you are wearing the watch for: dress, casual etc.

For me 40 mm is the perfect size for my 7.25" wrist.
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2015, 12:07 AM   #14
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
I went a bit bigger this year.



mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2015, 12:13 AM   #15
WWC
"TRF" Member
 
WWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Home
Posts: 1,438
40mm is definitely the best size. With the new case design of the sub ceramic it's the biggest I'd want to go. Perfect larger case due to the lugs but still at 40.

For me anywhere between the Daytona 40 and sub c 40 is perfect.

Just my own two cents.
__________________
Royal Oak 15500ST
Master Calendar METEORITE Q1552540 | Luminor GMT PAM 00335
Aquanaut 5167A-001 | Nautilus 5712/1A-001
Cosmograph DAYTONA 116520 | DEEPSEA 126660 | Explorer 214270 | GMT Master II BLRO 16710 | GMT Master II VTNR 126720 | Submariner LV 16610 | Sky-Dweller 326139 | Prince Oysterdate 90630
WWC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2015, 12:26 AM   #16
Mystro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,514
I am 40-44mm fan. Love em.
__________________
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hyitq0aikqgajc0/Time%20sig.jpg?raw=1[/img]
Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2015, 12:27 AM   #17
Annan
"TRF" Member
 
Annan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Ron
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: 116233
Posts: 3,180
With my 36mm DJ and 40mm GMTII I feel I have what's best for me. As with all watch issues/concerns, it comes down to what pleases you.
__________________
so many Rolexes.....so little time
Annan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2015, 12:44 AM   #18
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
It's never been about size for me. Rather what looks nice.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2015, 12:56 AM   #19
thomaspp
"TRF" Member
 
thomaspp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,137
My go to references are getting smaller and smaller. As much as I loved the YMII, it's 44 mm size was a bit too large to be honest.
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous
thomaspp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2015, 01:10 AM   #20
Hi-roller
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: London UK
Watch: Daytona,GMT's,1680
Posts: 283
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
Thank you for sharing. I suppose the ideal watch size depends largely on wrist size, and what you are wearing the watch for: dress, casual etc.

For me 40 mm is the perfect size for my 7.25" wrist.
Same for me, having downsized from Panerais and Breitlings. 40mm is the perfect size - legible but not too bulky on the wrist.
Hi-roller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2015, 01:12 AM   #21
elkaholic
"TRF" Member
 
elkaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ATL
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 683
I've got to agree with what others have said-the larger watches (above 40mm) are not for me. Given my size, anything above 40 looks cartoonish on me, in my opinion.

It's strange how much bigger a 40mm Sub seems after I've worn one of my 36mm DJ for a week or two straight, but I still like the combo of my 36 and 40mm pieces. Different styles/sizes for the circumstances.
elkaholic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2015, 02:54 AM   #22
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Racerdj View Post
I actually downsized slightly from the 44mm Breitlings to my 40-42mm current collection.
Same here, 44mm Breitlings and AP ROOs feel a but too much on my wrist nowadays and I find 40-2mm a nice sweet spot now and Rolex serves these dishes the best.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2015, 03:10 AM   #23
bigwatchman
"TRF" Member
 
bigwatchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Scott
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,307
It all depends on what you like. If you like big, wear them. If you prefer smaller, wear them. Doesn't really matter what anyone else thinks or what is trending. As long as you are happy and confident about what's on your wrist, that's all that matters.
__________________
Waiting for Arrival...
Omega Seamaster 120 Automatic
Luminox 3950 Orange
Luminox Field Watch Day-Date
Casio G-Shock Analog/Chrono
bigwatchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2015, 03:11 AM   #24
Psmith
"TRF" Member
 
Psmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike View Post
I went a bit bigger this year.




Beautiful pieces (and photos) Mike
__________________
Psmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2015, 03:18 AM   #25
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
39-42mm I've learned is my sweet spot.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2015, 03:28 AM   #26
wrxsti
"TRF" Member
 
wrxsti's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,695
Quote:
Originally Posted by travisb View Post
39-42mm I've learned is my sweet spot.
damn right travis especially for rolex and Ap those are my fav sizes
__________________
PP Geneva
wrxsti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2015, 03:33 AM   #27
adamlea
"TRF" Member
 
adamlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Great Plains
Watch: Exp II 216570 Blk
Posts: 1,190
There is no universal optimal size - it's a matter of personal preference. It's a you-say-poh-tato-I-say-pah-tato type of thing.
adamlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2015, 03:52 AM   #28
nick c
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
36-47
nick c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2015, 03:53 AM   #29
dchernikoff
"TRF" Member
 
dchernikoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Dan
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Watch: Sub LV
Posts: 678
I stopped in the local AD over the weekend, and since the Rolex counter was too crowded (two people putting down orders for DeepSea blue's!) I was looking at Omegas. The Speedmasters were nice. Then the guy showed me their diving watch (Seamaster??) -- it was ginormous! Seemed like an inch thick. Who could wear a watch like that? Next to my lovely GMT it just looked silly.

I know, to each their own and some people like big watches. Just not my cup of tea...

-Dan
dchernikoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2015, 04:09 AM   #30
DCgator
"TRF" Member
 
DCgator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PNW
Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2
Posts: 8,123
Icon6

My daily wear vary from 40-43mm in size. I wear 44mm watches when/where I like and appropriate. For me, it's how it looks nice on me and not about the size of the watch.

I continue to wonder when someone says the big size watches are a novelty. If not mistaken, IWC, Breitling, Panerai, to mention a few companies that have been in business a while, have been making big size watches for more than a bit. So, I don't see where novelty applies. Just my opinion, however.
DCgator is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.