ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
20 January 2015, 10:32 AM | #31 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: The Enabler
Location: South Cackalacky
Watch: me crash my bike
Posts: 5,564
|
I've ran with mine once and only once. It is way too heavy for that. The watch can handle it. The question is whether your wrist can handle the beating.
|
20 January 2015, 10:36 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
|
Sure can...but it's just way too uncomfortable (for me, anyway).
|
20 January 2015, 10:37 AM | #33 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Home
Posts: 307
|
Quote:
The right answer is "under normal conditions" paired with common sense. Don't you think? |
|
20 January 2015, 10:52 AM | #34 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
That's true.. You can't break the laws of physics. The greater the external forces on the watch the more the variance will be.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
20 January 2015, 11:06 AM | #35 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
|
Quote:
While I knew a Rolex could "handle" being worn when running, I've found this thread to be highly interesting and educational thanks to Tools' input. Personally, I find wearing any metal watch too uncomfortable when running. I'm another one who uses a Garmin. Much, much lighter and much, much more functionality. |
|
20 January 2015, 01:41 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 349
|
So, basically (having read Larry's succinct and accurate explanation of the effects of the activity on the watch), the question isn't whether or not the watch can take it, it's whether or not you can take wearing the watch for 26.2 miles.
Mark |
20 January 2015, 01:52 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,842
|
I've run with my explorer I and my sub- no problems here.
That being said, I couldn't tell you how many seconds they lose a day. Maybe it does something? But nothing so drastic that I feel I had to stop running with a Rolex on. |
20 January 2015, 02:00 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: SubC 114060
Posts: 486
|
i run with mine all the time and the movement seems to be fine. has not affected the accuracy from what i can tell
|
20 January 2015, 11:49 PM | #39 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,196
|
I would buy a G shock for running, eave the rolex at home..
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer 114300 Oyster Perpetual 76200 Tudor Date+Day |
20 January 2015, 11:49 PM | #40 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,196
|
I would buy a G shock for running, leave the rolex at home..
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer 114300 Oyster Perpetual 76200 Tudor Date+Day |
21 January 2015, 09:29 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: The Netherlands
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 545
|
I'm an avid runner and whilst running I have bumped my arms/wrists into quite a few solid objects like car's side mirrors (no my fault!), vegetation, walls, other runners...
Get a Garmin, give the Rolex a break! |
21 January 2015, 08:14 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
|
I do run occasionally with my Rolexes, Dssd and SubC.
No problems here. |
21 January 2015, 09:38 PM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 444
|
I alway run with my gmt2c. No problems at all. Just gets abit sweaty thou.
|
21 January 2015, 11:23 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Sarah
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 92
|
Allow me to give an answer based on personal experience. My husband is a US Navy veteran. He served 10 years at sea on three aircraft carriers and several other smaller ships and wore his Rolex Submariner the entire time. The watch never left his wrist for those 10 years including shore leave as he played softball, ran, etc... If the Sub and other Rolexes can take that abuse then running will be fine. It was his experience which sold me on my first Rolex, a Pepsi GMT. :)
Oh and he saw more than a few Navy pilots wearing Rolex watches, mostly Subs but a few GMT's as well. Hope this helps. Cheers, Sarah |
21 January 2015, 11:39 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Close to Rolex AD
Posts: 3,474
|
Running with Rolex should no cause anu was m considering Rafael Nadal has been wearing a Swiss watch when playing tennis ,I forgot it's brand but don't think it must be as solid as Rolex
__________________
|
21 January 2015, 11:59 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Middle
Posts: 878
|
|
22 January 2015, 12:30 AM | #47 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,355
|
I do all the time as I don't like to take it off at the gym etc.
|
22 January 2015, 12:34 AM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 813
|
I always wear my watches to the health club or when running in the subdivision. At the club, the GMT runs a tad fast when on the treadmill but only when I'm holding onto the grab bar, which subjects it to very little movement and vibration at all. I can't figure this out.
The other watches aren't affected by such activity. As for mechanical tolerance, I have no doubt the Tudors and Rolexes can take jogging and much more. I've had my GMT now for 44 years and in the old days, probably the first 35 years I owned it, I rarely removed it, even when working on the car, motorcycle, or doing yard work. I even foolishly chopped wood while wearing it on occasion, something I wouldn't do today. I never had a problem with it or any other watch, but nowadays remove the watch when doing anything that might scratch or otherwise traumatize it.
__________________
GMT 1675 SS (1969) Tudor Big Block Chrono 79170 white-dial panda (~1993) Tudor Big Block Chrono 79180 black-dial panda (~1993) Tudor Sub 79090 (1992) |
22 January 2015, 12:54 AM | #49 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: home
Watch: 214270
Posts: 59
|
Seems to run close to perfectly after a few cross fit sessions. The watch that is. Me, not so much.
|
22 January 2015, 03:56 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: NJ
Posts: 79
|
I'm an avid marathoner and always thought this question wass silly - why run with a Rolex when a garmin or Suunto is so much better suited to it and infinitely more comfortable.
However, I am in the process for training for a marathon in May. I thought that I would like to take my newly acquired Explorer II with me, but I would never want to leave it in a hotel room during the 3-4 hours of the race. So the thought occurred to me to throw it on a NATO and let it ride shotgun during the race. I still don't think I would be comfortable with real watch on though and will probably leave it at home. |
22 January 2015, 05:41 AM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 2,253
|
No comment
|
22 January 2015, 06:09 AM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Rob
Location: Texas
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 364
|
This is exactly the motivation I needed to start exercising again! My BLNR runs slow, and so do I, so if I want it to keep better time, I've GOT to start jogging again. Thanks!
__________________
On IG: robertrussell |
22 January 2015, 06:20 AM | #53 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,964
|
I am sure the Rolex can take it, but I have other watches that are better suited for the activity
I have a New Balance NX980 GPS watch. Its relatively inexpensive, tell me simple data like heart rate, pace, distance, lap, etc. I think that's a better running watch than my Rolex. haha
__________________
135 ├┼┼╕ 246 R |
22 January 2015, 09:05 AM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 1,314
|
Hell Yes, i wear my EX11 for running no probs, also my Sub and Daytona prior to that.
__________________
|
22 January 2015, 09:33 AM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Florida
Watch: 1960s Seamaster
Posts: 24
|
Of course!
I ran constantly with my 16610 for 4 years, and it kept perfect time when I parted with it. Firing ranges as well. It's a sports watch, and a diver at that. You don't think a boat ride out to a dive spot isn't jarring? If I had to worry about my Rolex not being able to handle my lifestyle, then it was a waste of money.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.