ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Johnb1 · 28 February 2015, 04:20 PM

I vote black and blue :)

1st amg · 28 February 2015, 09:53 PM

They are both quite different, and big price difference too. I find the daytona to small, but a stunning watch.

cop414 · 28 February 2015, 10:18 PM

Tough choice, I'd go black & blue myself.

Dyim · 28 February 2015, 11:04 PM

Fwiw, that dress is black and blue to my eyes.

Leasky · 28 February 2015, 11:59 PM

You need to be comparing apples with apples; the watches shown are very different time-pieces and, in my opinion, cannot be compared in either function or price. However, I like them both but for different reasons.

Kingair · 1 March 2015, 01:52 AM

Daytona ;)

East Bay Rider · 1 March 2015, 01:55 AM

I already have a GMT but i sold off my chronograph a while back so I'd take the Daytona.

nickb732 · 1 March 2015, 02:04 AM

Daytona. But as an aside the dress looks white and gold to me. It's taking over the internet!

GradyPhilpott · 1 March 2015, 02:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nickb732

Daytona. But as an aside the dress looks white and gold to me. It's taking over the internet!

Me, too!

salem65 · 1 March 2015, 02:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dyim

Fwiw, that dress is black and blue to my eyes.

I too was expecting to see another picture of that damn dress when I opened this thread

I say Black and Blue

AzPaul · 1 March 2015, 03:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nickb732

Daytona. But as an aside the dress looks white and gold to me. It's taking over the internet!

Not only do I see white and gold, I can't see how anyone gets blue and black out of that dang photo

. . . . as to the watches, I'd be good with either

Boothroyd · 1 March 2015, 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott

Me, too!

x2

Cesium133 · 2 March 2015, 12:43 AM

Lol. Good one.

vitalsignsrn · 2 March 2015, 03:02 AM

They are both gorgeous watches & obviously are totally different in terms of look. What fits in with your lifestyle better? Do you plan on a Sub some day? In that case, I would go for the Daytona. Are you thinking you might want a gold Day Date someday? Go for the GMT instead. I dont envy your dilemma. All the best. :-)

28 February 2015, 04:20 PM	#1
Johnb1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Location: Melb Australia Posts: 81	Black and blue, or white and gold? I vote black and blue :)

28 February 2015, 10:18 PM	#3
cop414 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Tim Location: Pennsylvania Watch: 14060M Posts: 72,261	Tough choice, I'd go black & blue myself. __________________ Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED

1 March 2015, 01:55 AM	#7
East Bay Rider "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Bill Location: East Bay RI Watch: GMT-II 16710LN Posts: 12,074	I already have a GMT but i sold off my chronograph a while back so I'd take the Daytona. __________________ I bought a cheap watch from the crazy man Floating down canal It doesn't use numbers or moving hands It always just says "now" Now you may be thinking that I was had But this watch is never wrong And if I have trouble the warranty said Breathe In, Breathe Out, Move On J. Buffett Instagram: eastbayrider46

1 March 2015, 02:04 AM	#8
nickb732 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Real Name: Nicholas Location: UK Posts: 2,630	Daytona. But as an aside the dress looks white and gold to me. It's taking over the internet! __________________ Nick

28 February 2015, 09:53 PM	#2
1st amg 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: nicholas Location: ottawa canada Watch: Rolex,AP,Panerai Posts: 10,410	They are both quite different, and big price difference too. I find the daytona to small, but a stunning watch.

28 February 2015, 11:04 PM	#4
Dyim "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Canada Posts: 2,237	Fwiw, that dress is black and blue to my eyes.

28 February 2015, 11:59 PM	#5
Leasky "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: Colin Leask. Location: Scotland, UK. Watch: 118238 YG DD. Posts: 723	You need to be comparing apples with apples; the watches shown are very different time-pieces and, in my opinion, cannot be compared in either function or price. However, I like them both but for different reasons.

1 March 2015, 01:52 AM	#6
Kingair "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: USA Watch: Not enough ;-) Posts: 21,232	Daytona ;)

2 March 2015, 12:43 AM	#13
Cesium133 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: USA Posts: 2,037	Lol. Good one.

2 March 2015, 03:02 AM	#14
vitalsignsrn "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Judy Location: Ontario Watch: 116234 - 14060M Posts: 4,607	They are both gorgeous watches & obviously are totally different in terms of look. What fits in with your lifestyle better? Do you plan on a Sub some day? In that case, I would go for the Daytona. Are you thinking you might want a gold Day Date someday? Go for the GMT instead. I dont envy your dilemma. All the best. :-)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)