The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 April 2015, 12:17 AM   #1
ernie2
"TRF" Member
 
ernie2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Arnold
Location: New York
Watch: SD4K+BLNR
Posts: 849
2 questionable Rolex design choices

This is just a personal opinion and not meant to offend current owners of the referred watches. You don't have to agree with me, it is just my observation.

For the record, I am not bashing Rolex, I own 3 Rolexes ( EXP 1, EXP 2, SD4K) and I love Rolex's quality and design. However, as a design professional, there are 2 design flaws keep sticking out as eyesores to me.

In every aspect of the Rolex watches, the curves of the case, the fonts of the lettering, the color schemes were well designed aesthetically to please our eyes. But there are 2 things just seemed to be afterthoughts without any design put into it.

1. The 24hr hand of the last generation Explorer 2 16570 and all the GMTs. All the hands of the Rolexes had some design elements to them. Be the Mercedes shape, the 3D tapering of the DD, or the round lume dot on the second hands. If you look at the 24hr hand of the above mentioned models, they are straight sticks with an isosceles triangles at the end. Like street yield signs. They do not even have tapering and do not look like they belong with the rest of the watch hands.

Luckily, at the new Explorer II 216570, they changed the 24hr hands. But it seems like there is no plans to update the GMTs.

2. A lot of people are going to disagree with this one here. I cannot stand the thick metal ring inside the DSSD. It has no curve lines, no chamfering, like a piece of plumbing parts from home depot. And don't get me started on the big lettering of the RING LOCK SYSTEM. That is similar to people wearing big GUCCI prints on their clothes, you can see it from a block away.

These are just my observations. I hope no owners of GMTs and DSSD are offended.
ernie2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 12:25 AM   #2
superdog
2024 Pledge Member
 
superdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,834
Ok. Fair opinions.

How are they design flaws?

Because you don't like them? Or are they flawed?
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it?

IG: gsmotorclub
IG: thesawcollection

(Both mostly just car stuff)
superdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 12:28 AM   #3
NeedlessKane
"TRF" Member
 
NeedlessKane's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Watch: 1991 14060 Sub
Posts: 498
I think you're confusing "flaws" and "personal preference"

What you described are not flaws in terms of workmanship, but rather design differences.
NeedlessKane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 12:31 AM   #4
watchnutty
"TRF" Member
 
watchnutty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 347
replace the word "flaws" with "opinions".
the 24 hour hand on my GMT II is my favorite part of the watch.
as far as any DeepSea, you couldn't pay me to wear one with that writing on it.
see, opinions, not design flaws.
watchnutty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 12:32 AM   #5
ernie2
"TRF" Member
 
ernie2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Arnold
Location: New York
Watch: SD4K+BLNR
Posts: 849
There are no flaws what so ever in workmanship. To me, they are perfect.

However, in the product design world, there are some proven basic principles we adhere to. All elements of a product should speak the same set of language and have co-relations with each other. Of course there are exceptions.

If a car has fluid curvy front like a BMW and has a boxy tail like a Cadillac, it is just bad design. Buy hey, there is no right or wrong, it just look weird and people might actually buy it.
ernie2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 12:33 AM   #6
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Yes. To be picky...these are not design flaws but aesthetic choices.

I'm fine with the arrow on the GMT hand. I certainly like it better than the teeny tiny triangle on early models. I do like the Expy Orange hand, but that design is closely tied to that watch.

What heck does ring lock system mean anyway ;-)
Speed is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 12:36 AM   #7
RockinIt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Mr. Anderson
Location: The Dairy State
Watch: DDII
Posts: 194
A design flaw would be how the bracelet may "stretch" but you make good point about the design choices of rolex
RockinIt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 12:48 AM   #8
ernie2
"TRF" Member
 
ernie2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Arnold
Location: New York
Watch: SD4K+BLNR
Posts: 849
You guys have a point. I have changed the title of the post to questionable design choices
ernie2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 12:51 AM   #9
Tri-Tip
"TRF" Member
 
Tri-Tip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CA, USA
Watch: Out!!!
Posts: 6,474
I don't care for the wording on the inside of the DSSD either, but that's my opinion. Also don't care for the "Yacht Master II" wording on the bezel of that watch.
Tri-Tip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 01:06 AM   #10
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
I had a DSSD and the Ring Lock Text never bothered me, on the wrist everything on a watch is just so much smaller than in pics.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 01:07 AM   #11
Nycturbovr6
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 7,630
To each their own
Nycturbovr6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 01:32 AM   #12
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by superdog View Post
Ok. Fair opinions.

How are they design flaws?

Because you don't like them? Or are they flawed?
x2.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 02:00 AM   #13
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Has anyone looked into the Ring Lock System? ;-)
Speed is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 02:04 AM   #14
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,307
Everyone can and will find things to criticize, and, it's better that way, IMHO, than overly consensual design.

Personally, I find the new 24-hour hand of the Explorer II to be way too thick and, for the black, specifically, the so-called "floating effect" is a total fail.... Still nice watch though.
Cru Jones is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 02:15 AM   #15
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speed View Post
Has anyone looked into the Ring Lock System? ;-)
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 02:25 AM   #16
bdex75
"TRF" Member
 
bdex75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: my money vanish
Posts: 8,506
2 questionable Rolex design choices

Everyone is entitled to their opinions. That is what makes the world interesting. I don't tend to agree with your opinion on these two in particular, but that is ok. I have opinions on the Daytona and YM2 that aren't likely popular but presented well are tolerated by most.

The Ring Lock System writing has never seemed to be a distraction to me in real life.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
bdex75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 02:30 AM   #17
Cryten
"TRF" Member
 
Cryten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Terrafirma
Posts: 2,655
Thanks for the post Mike, I've often wondered about the ringlock system, but clearly not enough to actually Google it.

Now I may appreciate the lettering a little more.
Cryten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 03:01 AM   #18
Jim Smyth
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Jim Smyth
Location: Florida
Watch: DD
Posts: 1,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by ernie2 View Post
I cannot stand the thick metal ring inside the DSSD. It has no curve lines, no chamfering, like a piece of plumbing parts from home depot. And don't get me started on the big lettering of the RING LOCK SYSTEM.
I am with you there. I wouldnt wear that watch if someone gave it to me. Whatever I buy I remove all access extraneous writing if I can. Kinda like dealership logos on your new car etc. Gotta go, I like things looking clean.
Jim Smyth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 03:02 AM   #19
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
The 5mm extension (easylink) is a flaw IMO. Only Dr. Banner needs 5mm when he gets angry. Normal people need 2mm perhaps 3 but that's the max.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 03:04 AM   #20
SeaAndSky
"TRF" Member
 
SeaAndSky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Wild Blue Yonder
Watch: 116710 LN
Posts: 1,613
Quote:
Originally Posted by ernie2 View Post
A lot of people are going to disagree
Yup, they are. I love the GMT! Not only is if functional but, new or vintage, they have the loveliest lines of any mechanical watch I've ever seen.
SeaAndSky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 04:39 AM   #21
osamu
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,322
in pictures I was never a fan of the "Ring Lock System" text, but when I saw it in person, I was surprised how I barely noticed it. I think it's one of those things (along with like the Milgauss second hand) where in blown up pictures it sticks out like a sore thumb, but on the wrist it's a lot smaller and not as noticeable. I don't think I would notice it a block away.

That being said, I wouldn't mind them, like you said, adding a chamfer or some type of subtle shape to that ring with smaller text to make it a little more interesting.
osamu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 08:35 AM   #22
strafer_kid
"TRF" Member
 
strafer_kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,136
All down to personal choice just!
strafer_kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 09:17 AM   #23
SALTY
"TRF" Member
 
SALTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Your Six
Posts: 1,500
Quote:
Originally Posted by strafer_kid View Post
All down to personal choice just!
I agree.
__________________
Time and tide wait for no man.
SALTY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 09:44 AM   #24
Ravager135
"TRF" Member
 
Ravager135's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,224
I think the design choice is intentional because it contrasts with the aesthetic of the rest of the watch. Think about it: the hour and minute hands are similar in design because they are grouped to read the local time. The 24 hour hand which is designed to be reflective of a separate time zone should contrast so referencing it is a deliberate choice by the viewer. They are intended to be viewed separately as they convey different information. The Explorer II goes one step further by making the 24 hour hand larger in proportion and a bright color to deliberately make it stand out.

I get your points. I think you just made the case as to why they are different looking.
Ravager135 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 10:50 AM   #25
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
I agree about the DSSD ring/gas thing, but the aforementioned 24hr hand wouldn't even make the small print on a long list of other questionable rolex design choices for me.
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 11:23 AM   #26
Wingman244
"TRF" Member
 
Wingman244's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Pacific NW, USA
Watch: Root Beer
Posts: 734
Wow, as a designer and photographer I read your first sentence about a design flaw and said to myself don't read it, don't read it, it will ruin you. Kind of like the song that gets in your head and never leaves. Then I saw - "24hr hand" and my conscience was yelling at me "Close the dang thread!"

Then "Luckily, at the new Explorer II 216570, they changed the 24hr hands." whew,,, that turned out well.

Personally, that is why I choose the E2 Polar 216570 - it was the most beautiful design. I love the maxi hands and the orange 24 hour hand. From a design perspective I think it is Rolex's best and most balanced design. I still look at it and just think "wow". (Just my opinion...)
Wingman244 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 11:26 AM   #27
acarriles
"TRF" Member
 
acarriles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Houston
Watch: Blue SS SkyDweller
Posts: 411
I think that you also forgot that good design follows form and function. In the case of the DSSD it is a TOOL watch. As a tool, it is appropriate to indicate its capabilities and functionalities. Like the depth at which it can operate, and the unique features it has compared to other similar tools, hence the Ring Lock System which is what allows it to withstand such pressure, and the Gas Escape Valve to provide automatic decompression.

You mentioned that the ring looks like a piece of pipe. It should. It is a mechanical piece that provides structural support. It is not there for decoration. The fact that we choose to use the DSSD as a luxury item instead of as its intended function (diver's tool) does not make the design flawed.

And when on the wrist, given the thickness of the sapphire crystal, it provides just enough light distortion that the writing is barely noticeable and at a secondary plane to the main visual focus of the dial.

Just my opinion too ;)
acarriles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 07:17 PM   #28
regnant
"TRF" Member
 
regnant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Close to Rolex AD
Posts: 3,474
DSDD is a tool watch not fancy dress watch , meant to be able to handle deepths beyond fathomable given these facts if Rolex put down something it is there because of a good reason
__________________
http://s30.postimg.org/eykg4i271/A_Lange_Sohne_Movement.jpg
regnant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2015, 01:34 AM   #29
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
I have no problem with the 24 hour hands on the GMTs. I also think that the 16550 and the 16570 represent the pinnacle of Explorer II design.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2015, 01:51 AM   #30
powerfunk
"TRF" Member
 
powerfunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Rob
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: 1530
Posts: 3,799
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchnutty View Post
as far as any DeepSea, you couldn't pay me to wear one with that writing on it.
Well without that writing, how would you know whether or not they were replicating a pre-existing Gas Escape Valve?
powerfunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.