The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13 May 2008, 03:43 AM   #1
seantk
"TRF" Member
 
seantk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Sean
Location: West Florida
Posts: 2,671
Deep Sea depth rating = 4482m/14710ft ??

The depth rating on the new Sea Dweller Deep Sea is 3900m/12800ft, however Rolex states that this watch can withstand a colossal 2.98 metric tonnes of water pressure.

2.98 metric tonnes = 6570 PSI, which is the equivalent of 4482m/14710ft


Could the listed depth rating of the Sea Dweller Deep Sea have anything to do with this:

"The average depth of the Atlantic Ocean is 3,900 meters (12,800 ft). The ocean bed is made up of hills, mountains, tablelands and valleys just as on dry land."

Source - Click Here

or

"Average depth of the Indian Ocean is 3,900 meters (12,800 feet)"

Source - Click Here

Sean
__________________
"Life is frittered away with detail... simplify, simplify!" Henry D. Thoreau
seantk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 03:46 AM   #2
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
If only they'd made it to 13,000 ft, I would have bought it!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 03:53 AM   #3
roadcarver
"TRF" Member
 
roadcarver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Vernon
Location: C-a-n-a-d-a
Watch: 16600
Posts: 5,641
What's the point of such depths? Will a diver be able to survive such depths?
__________________
I'm just a cook...
roadcarver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 03:55 AM   #4
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by roadcarver View Post
What's the point of such depths? Will a diver be able to survive such depths?
Nothing on earth can survive such depths.....except some very specialised deep sea creatures that have been adapted by Mother Nature!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 03:57 AM   #5
Markg
"TRF" Member
 
Markg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Mark
Location: California
Watch: R
Posts: 913
Quote:
Originally Posted by seantk View Post
2.98 metric tonnes = 6570 PSI, which is the equivalent of 4482m/14710ft
they dont say if it is rated in fresh water or salt water; perhaps that is the difference...
Markg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 04:00 AM   #6
roadcarver
"TRF" Member
 
roadcarver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Vernon
Location: C-a-n-a-d-a
Watch: 16600
Posts: 5,641
Thanks JJ. I guess its over engineered design is the explanation for the Deep Sea

Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
Nothing on earth can survive such depths.....except some very specialised deep sea creatures that have been adapted by Mother Nature!!
__________________
I'm just a cook...
roadcarver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 04:05 AM   #7
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by roadcarver View Post
Thanks JJ. I guess its over engineered design is the explanation for the Deep Sea
It's over-engineered for one purpose and one purpose only, Vernon - TO SELL!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 04:07 AM   #8
Jocke
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Jocke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jocke
Location: Sweden
Watch: A dozen of Rolex's
Posts: 22,541
Quote:
Originally Posted by seantk View Post
The depth rating on the new Sea Dweller Deep Sea is 3900m/12800ft, however Rolex states that this watch can withstand a colossal 2.98 metric tonnes of water pressure.

2.98 metric tonnes = 6570 PSI, which is the equivalent of 4482m/14710ft


Could the listed depth rating of the Sea Dweller Deep Sea have anything to do with this:

"The average depth of the Atlantic Ocean is 3,900 meters (12,800 ft). The ocean bed is made up of hills, mountains, tablelands and valleys just as on dry land."

Source - Click Here

or

"Average depth of the Indian Ocean is 3,900 meters (12,800 feet)"

Source - Click Here

Sean
Come on Sean, if you have one you haven´t swim with it anyway.



Jocke
__________________
This message is written in perfect swenglish.

What is best a custom Rolex or a Rolex that is stuck in custom?

Buy a professional camera and you´re a professional
photographer, buy a flute and you own a flute.
Jocke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 04:08 AM   #9
Tony-GB
"TRF" Member
 
Tony-GB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
If only they'd made it to 13,000 ft, I would have bought it!!
LMAO!!!
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?"

http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/

www.cheetah.org
Tony-GB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 04:08 AM   #10
seantk
"TRF" Member
 
seantk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Sean
Location: West Florida
Posts: 2,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Markg View Post
they dont say if it is rated in fresh water or salt water; perhaps that is the difference...
I was curious as why Rolex chose 3900m/12800ft since the Deep Sea had been tested deeper (more pressure). I know there were posts that suggested the 12800 had to do with Chinese numerology, however I would like to believe that it has more to do with actual depth of an Ocean.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jocke View Post
Come on Sean, if you have one you haven´t swim with it anyway.



Jocke
If I get one, I will be sure to post pictures of me swimming with it


Sean
__________________
"Life is frittered away with detail... simplify, simplify!" Henry D. Thoreau
seantk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 04:21 AM   #11
fear
"TRF" Member
 
fear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mililani, Oahu
Posts: 1,307
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
It's over-engineered for one purpose and one purpose only, Vernon - TO SELL!!
Ya got that right! Soon the masses will start swooning at the ADs.
fear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 04:51 AM   #12
DSJ
"TRF" Member
 
DSJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
If only they'd made it to 13,000 ft, I would have bought it!!
Remember they're actually able to stand 10% more than advertised. So, JJ, if your DS cracks on you when YOU PERSONALLY take it to 13K feet, I'll replace it for you!!!
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches.
16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II,
2552.80 SMP
DSJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 04:55 AM   #13
jgreene1672
"TRF" Member
 
jgreene1672's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Watch: TT Blue Submariner
Posts: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by roadcarver View Post
What's the point of such depths? Will a diver be able to survive such depths?
A diver could never survive at the maximum depth for a submariner, and if thats overkill imagine the deepsea.

I like it, but your paying alot for a completely useless feature, but then again who really needs a rolex...?
jgreene1672 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 04:59 AM   #14
DSJ
"TRF" Member
 
DSJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
Quote:
Originally Posted by jgreene1672 View Post
but your paying alot for a completely useless feature, but then again who really needs a rolex...?
You said it! Something that doesn't keep as good a time as your cell phone could be considered a useless feature, yet we pay thousands!!!

I love Rolex!
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches.
16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II,
2552.80 SMP
DSJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 05:01 AM   #15
seantk
"TRF" Member
 
seantk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Sean
Location: West Florida
Posts: 2,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by jgreene1672 View Post
A diver could never survive at the maximum depth for a submariner, and if thats overkill imagine the deepsea.

I like it, but your paying alot for a completely useless feature, but then again who really needs a rolex...?
There have been Scuba dives in excess of 1000ft (1027ft) and a Navy diver has been to 2000ft using an atmospheric dive suit (ADS). Both of these dives would exceed the depth rating of the Submariner

Scuba Deep Dive - Click Here

Navy Dive with ADS - Click Here

Sean
__________________
"Life is frittered away with detail... simplify, simplify!" Henry D. Thoreau
seantk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 05:04 AM   #16
DSJ
"TRF" Member
 
DSJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
Quote:
Originally Posted by seantk View Post
There have been Scuba dives in excess of 1000ft (1027ft) and a Navy diver has been to 2000ft using an atmospheric dive suit (ADS). Both of these dives would exceed the depth rating of the Submariner

Scuba Deep Dive - Click Here

Navy Dive with ADS - Click Here

Sean
So we can safely say that the Submariner (or SMP) can handle anything a SCUBA diver would encounter, whereas a SD would be able to withstand any free dive. The DS would be able to withstand being dropped to the bottom of many areas of the ocean.
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches.
16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II,
2552.80 SMP
DSJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 05:06 AM   #17
rescue7
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Rescueguy
Location: Here
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 1,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by DSJ View Post
Remember they're actually able to stand 10% more than advertised. So, JJ, if your DS cracks on you when YOU PERSONALLY take it to 13K feet, I'll replace it for you!!!
According to the watchmaker that works at the local AD I frequent, he stated that it was tested and made it to 5000m.
He was one of few invited to Baselworld grat and got a tour of the Rolex facility in Geneva.
He also saw stockpiles of S/S Daytona's sitting there, waiting to be sent to all the AD's. He could not believe his eyes, he also saw lots of Milgauss GV's.
rescue7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 05:46 AM   #18
Aqua fobic
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Mark
Location: UK now and again
Watch: Seadweller
Posts: 127
Believe it or not 3900m is not that deep. I know that sounds daft but the ROVs on some of the vessels I work on regulaly work at depths of 2500m especialy of the coast of west Africa.
They have a depth rating of 3000m and thats with a safety factor built in so I dare say, with a nudge in the right direction they could go deeper.
Oh and these are between 5 and 10 years old so technology has moved on since then.
Mixed gas divers on the other hand do work at depths of 250m sometimes 300+ but the practicalities of these depths make it uneconomical to do so. The main problem is you have to reduce the amount of Oxygen in the mix from the normal 21% we breath now down to around 1% @ 300m. The body can stand greater depths, after all we are 90% water anyway, its the reduction of Oxygen thats the limiting factor.

Having said all that at least the DSSD is safe in the shower
Aqua fobic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 07:31 AM   #19
topcat30093
"TRF" Member
 
topcat30093's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,460
Thanks for doing the maths
Nice info.
__________________
topcat30093 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 07:46 AM   #20
llamaofdoom
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 417
Quote:
Originally Posted by roadcarver View Post
What's the point of such depths? Will a diver be able to survive such depths?
No reason, other than because it's cool.

llamaofdoom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 07:50 AM   #21
eric23
"TRF" Member
 
eric23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
Thanks for the info, Now I really want one.

Does anyone know when they will be hitting the store self’s in Canada?

Eric
eric23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 09:07 AM   #22
jgreene1672
"TRF" Member
 
jgreene1672's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Watch: TT Blue Submariner
Posts: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by seantk View Post
There have been Scuba dives in excess of 1000ft (1027ft) and a Navy diver has been to 2000ft using an atmospheric dive suit (ADS). Both of these dives would exceed the depth rating of the Submariner

Scuba Deep Dive - Click Here

Navy Dive with ADS - Click Here

Sean
The first dive was only 313m and knowing rolex I doubt my sub would die at just 13 meters over, and as for the second good luck getting a watch to fit over your arm.
jgreene1672 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 11:24 AM   #23
BiG JeEzY
"TRF" Member
 
BiG JeEzY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jerome
Location: N. California
Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ
Posts: 3,351
Just imagine the Bell and Ross Hydormax which is water resistant to 11,000 meters or over 30,000 feet. Talk about marketing to the extreme! Is there even any ocean that goes down that deep?

That Hydromax watch can probably go all the way into the crust or mantle of the Earth and still function.
__________________
-Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001)
-Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978)
-Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991)
-Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique
-Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial
BiG JeEzY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 11:29 AM   #24
1MAC
"TRF" Member
 
1MAC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Leawood, Kansas
Watch: Submariner 16610
Posts: 854
Quote:
Originally Posted by Markg View Post
they dont say if it is rated in fresh water or salt water; perhaps that is the difference...
We have a winner! Salt water is more dense than fresh water. I bet that's why they rate them so. It's always nice to float in ocean water and enjoy the greater bouyancy.
1MAC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 11:35 AM   #25
BiG JeEzY
"TRF" Member
 
BiG JeEzY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jerome
Location: N. California
Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ
Posts: 3,351
Quote:
Originally Posted by BiG JeEzY View Post
Just imagine the Bell and Ross Hydormax which is water resistant to 11,000 meters or over 30,000 feet. Talk about marketing to the extreme! Is there even any ocean that goes down that deep?

That Hydromax watch can probably go all the way into the crust or mantle of the Earth and still function.

Heres a picture of the world's most water resistant watch, the Hydromax...To give it that depth, the case is filled with a subtance known as hydroil I believe so if you held the watch, it would look like there was literally water on the dial.
Attached Images
 
__________________
-Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001)
-Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978)
-Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991)
-Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique
-Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial
BiG JeEzY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 08:55 PM   #26
seantk
"TRF" Member
 
seantk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Sean
Location: West Florida
Posts: 2,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by BiG JeEzY View Post
Heres a picture of the world's most water resistant watch, the Hydromax...To give it that depth, the case is filled with a subtance known as hydroil I believe so if you held the watch, it would look like there was literally water on the dial.
The MTM Black Seal watch is depth rated to 12000M (39000FT)

Click here for the Black Seal

Quote:
Originally Posted by BiG JeEzY View Post
Just imagine the Bell and Ross Hydormax which is water resistant to 11,000 meters or over 30,000 feet. Talk about marketing to the extreme! Is there even any ocean that goes down that deep?

That Hydromax watch can probably go all the way into the crust or mantle of the Earth and still function.
Yes - The Marianas Trench

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgreene1672 View Post
The first dive was only 313m and knowing rolex I doubt my sub would die at just 13 meters over, and as for the second good luck getting a watch to fit over your arm.
A NATO strap might work

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1MAC View Post
We have a winner! Salt water is more dense than fresh water. I bet that's why they rate them so. It's always nice to float in ocean water and enjoy the greater bouyancy.
My calculation was using salt water. The fresh water depth rating would be approximately 15140ft/4612m

Sean
__________________
"Life is frittered away with detail... simplify, simplify!" Henry D. Thoreau
seantk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 10:12 PM   #27
rescue7
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Rescueguy
Location: Here
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 1,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by eric23 View Post
Thanks for the info, Now I really want one.

Does anyone know when they will be hitting the store self’s in Canada?

Eric
I'm hearing late summer, early fall. Kinda like Aug/Sept/Oct. Knowing Rolex Canada it will show up right around x-mas and i'm anticipating a long waiting list.
I'm on the list with my AD, i'm in no rush still enjoying my LV.
rescue7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 10:13 PM   #28
redshirt1957
"TRF" Member
 
redshirt1957's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Bubba
Location: Bitsyville!
Watch: Blue YM today!
Posts: 10,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
Nothing on earth can survive such depths.....except some very specialised deep sea creatures that have been adapted by Mother Nature!!

Maybe I will use my SD as bait and see what kind of sea creature I can catch.
redshirt1957 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 10:33 PM   #29
Trurolexer
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
Nice info, Sean.
Trurolexer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2008, 10:34 PM   #30
Trurolexer
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
Quote:
Originally Posted by BiG JeEzY View Post
Heres a picture of the world's most water resistant watch, the Hydromax...To give it that depth, the case is filled with a subtance known as hydroil I believe so if you held the watch, it would look like there was literally water on the dial.
WOW!!! What's that, Pal? Somekind of watch? lol!!!
Trurolexer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.