The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5 July 2015, 05:09 AM   #1
a0asse01
"TRF" Member
 
a0asse01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Watch: SS Sub 16610
Posts: 12
RSC Needs?

So I've just recently bought my Rolex (16610) and it had just returned from the RSC so it could be sold in as new condition as possible. So for the time being I'm good. But I know in due time I will need to send my watch off and I know its always been 5-7 years and now I'm hearing 10. Assuming you watch is being used just for normal wear and you don't see any issues with anything, is there a need to send it sooner than later? Is using the moto "If it ain't broke don't fix it" good, or should I have a "timer" so that I should send my watch out when the time comes?

My father has had his for 20 some odd years and to my knowledge he's never sent it back. Certainly not within the past 15 years. I've never seen that watch off his wrist for longer than a couple hours.

Thanks
Andrew
a0asse01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 July 2015, 05:17 AM   #2
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
It's always been little more than a recommendation, not a mandatory time period. If you wear your watch in harsh conditions and it gets pretty beat up, I would think that sooner would be a good choice.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 July 2015, 05:25 AM   #3
dph473
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Norcal
Watch: 116710BLNR
Posts: 82
I know it's against all the recommendations but I just recently had my 16610 serviced and it had been over 15 years since it's last service. It was a daily watch for me and kept great time until just before the service.
As far as I know it didn't cost me any more to service the watch.
dph473 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 July 2015, 05:51 AM   #4
liuk3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,354
Quote:
Originally Posted by dph473 View Post
I know it's against all the recommendations but I just recently had my 16610 serviced and it had been over 15 years since it's last service. It was a daily watch for me and kept great time until just before the service.
As far as I know it didn't cost me any more to service the watch.
I think it's like waiting longer to get your car serviced or oil changed. You're probably ok, but the longer you put it off, the higher the probability that there could be more costly repairs potentially needed. Each person has to access their own risk profile.
__________________
"Appreciate your life!"
liuk3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 July 2015, 05:54 AM   #5
cop414
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
cop414's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,258
Quote:
Originally Posted by liuk3 View Post
I think it's like waiting longer to get your car serviced or oil changed. You're probably ok, but the longer you put it off, the higher the probability that there could be more costly repairs potentially needed. Each person has to access their own risk profile.
Agree with this. Also don't forget that rubber seals deteriorate over time which will compromise water resistance.
__________________

Rolex Submariner 14060M
Omega Seamaster 2254.50
DOXA Professional 1200T

Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron
P Club Member #17
2 FA ENABLED
cop414 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 July 2015, 06:21 AM   #6
Blnrwearer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: California, USA
Posts: 65
I think service is good to the watch but my interval would be 10-12 years.
Blnrwearer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 July 2015, 06:41 AM   #7
Mr. K
"TRF" Member
 
Mr. K's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Mark
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blnrwearer View Post
I think service is good to the watch but my interval would be 10-12 years.
Agreed, some of mine are overdue but they mostly sit in the bank these days.
Mr. K is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.