'Definitive' Answer re Cyclops Magnification from RSC Singapore

[busytimmy]

Holy thread-bump!

PS: "Sub C" and "Hulk" are both Sub Cs...

[Joemck]

A bit off topic but I noticed a significant change in the magnification of the old plexi models: 1680; 1675. Obviously the font is different. Still, they appear larger and much easier to read. I was wondering if crystal or ar coating might be a factor.
I apologize for high jacking thread. Thanks

[HogwldFLTR]

My Sub C had no mag error as it was dateless. I never had a Sub C Date.

[Andad]

Originally Posted by busytimmy

Holy thread-bump!

PS: "Sub C" and "Hulk" are both Sub Cs...

PS: You mean SubDate C?

The 'Hulk" is not a Submariner.

[cht]

Originally Posted by Joemck

I was wondering if crystal or ar coating might be a factor.
I apologize for high jacking thread. Thanks

It is not an AR issue, as you can clearly see many crystals with the AR on the cyclops have 2.5x.
What would AR have to do with magnification anyways?

It is clearly an issue with a crappy shape of the cyclops.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPTHNg8gvTA

[busytimmy]

Originally Posted by directioneng

PS: You mean SubDate C?

The 'Hulk" is not a Submariner.

While we're being anal about it:

Submariner Date Ceramic.

You're welcome