ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

V.lats97nsx · 24 October 2015, 07:34 AM

Hey guys I was hoping someone can help me authenticate this pam243. Since box and papers are not present I am a bit concerned. Please help in anyway. Thank you in advance

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Tha Baron · 24 October 2015, 12:43 PM

Red Flag 1: no box or papers. Hope the price reflects that.
Red Flag 2: likely you're not dealing w a trusted or reputable seller with references?

Buy the seller... Not sure why people choose to try authenticating a $5,000+ watch that is heavily counterfeited based on four pics to a forum of people you don't know.

Again, buy the seller and you need not worry. Lots of bad light and shadows in those pics that are taken from weird angles. Watch looks dirty too

Edit: lug holes don't look right. Shouldn't one side have slots for screw driver? Perhaps they changed to quick change at some point on the 243

Are there "." After the T.M. Or T M on the crown guard? I believe there should be

Etschell · 24 October 2015, 12:53 PM

It's a fake. Pearl is over filled and cg corner at case isn't right.

V.lats97nsx · 24 October 2015, 01:29 PM

I believe it has "L" dial which is newer the older "t" dials came with the screws for the lugs. It is t.m.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

hitman23 · 24 October 2015, 01:46 PM

had a 243. the bezel edge looks off. should be a beveled polished edge on the bezel. I would pass without any accompanying tags or papers. too many pam replicas out there these days.

armybuck041 · 24 October 2015, 02:08 PM

Cannon Pin on the second hand doesn't look right. Either way, IMO, buying a Pam without a display back or paperwork is scary.

24 October 2015, 07:34 AM	#1
V.lats97nsx 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Location: Syracuse Posts: 4,107	Help Authenticating a pam 243 Hey guys I was hoping someone can help me authenticate this pam243. Since box and papers are not present I am a bit concerned. Please help in anyway. Thank you in advance Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

24 October 2015, 02:08 PM	#6
armybuck041 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Fred'ton Canada Watch: Easy Come, Easy Go Posts: 304	Cannon Pin on the second hand doesn't look right. Either way, IMO, buying a Pam without a display back or paperwork is scary. __________________ Easy come, easy go....

24 October 2015, 12:43 PM	#2
Tha Baron "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: Middle West Posts: 1,077	Red Flag 1: no box or papers. Hope the price reflects that. Red Flag 2: likely you're not dealing w a trusted or reputable seller with references? Buy the seller... Not sure why people choose to try authenticating a $5,000+ watch that is heavily counterfeited based on four pics to a forum of people you don't know. Again, buy the seller and you need not worry. Lots of bad light and shadows in those pics that are taken from weird angles. Watch looks dirty too Edit: lug holes don't look right. Shouldn't one side have slots for screw driver? Perhaps they changed to quick change at some point on the 243 Are there "." After the T.M. Or T M on the crown guard? I believe there should be

24 October 2015, 12:53 PM	#3
Etschell "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: FL Watch: platinum sub Posts: 15,884	It's a fake. Pearl is over filled and cg corner at case isn't right.

24 October 2015, 01:29 PM	#4
V.lats97nsx 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Location: Syracuse Posts: 4,107	I believe it has "L" dial which is newer the older "t" dials came with the screws for the lugs. It is t.m. Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

24 October 2015, 01:46 PM	#5
hitman23 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: ny Posts: 765	had a 243. the bezel edge looks off. should be a beveled polished edge on the bezel. I would pass without any accompanying tags or papers. too many pam replicas out there these days.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)