ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Brianlap55 · 13 November 2015, 11:48 AM

Ahem...however I'm thinking of my next move...I have access to a 1680 in the same condition...or should I go GMT?

Scoobs · 13 November 2015, 11:55 AM

Pepsi GMT would be my vote. The splash of colour is awesome

SLS · 13 November 2015, 12:06 PM

Red or white 1680? However, it would seem that you get more bang for you buck on a 1675. Or white 1680 and 1675 for the price of some Red 1680's!

Brianlap55 · 13 November 2015, 12:13 PM

Sorry I should have clarified white 1680

harry in montreal · 13 November 2015, 01:25 PM

Get both. They seem to hold their values if the dials are correct

Nobody.Move · 13 November 2015, 05:14 PM

Stickin' with the four digits, huh?

bizznatchers · 16 November 2015, 02:26 AM

id stick with what you got!

Brianlap55 · 16 November 2015, 08:00 AM

That's what I meant

In addition to the 5512 not to replace it

Lordofrolex · 16 November 2015, 08:17 AM

Coke gmt

strafer_kid · 16 November 2015, 08:22 AM

1675 Pepsi especially with a hint of fade really looks well and makes for a nice change from a Sub. That said, 1680 Sub is also very nice indeed - can't go wrong with either!

subtona · 16 November 2015, 08:58 AM

That's a beauty.

Hi-roller · 16 November 2015, 09:12 AM

You're asking the question so I guess you'll have to get both.

datejust24 · 16 November 2015, 09:16 AM

I'd go with the 1680 but have I believe a tropic 19 crystal installed (no cyclops)...I love that look

Dr DRW · 16 November 2015, 11:54 AM

go for a 1675 first

sishac · 20 November 2015, 04:45 AM

I've got a 1675 and a 1680...I think that the size of the GMT (mine is a 1.7M) seems a bit smaller than the 1680. That is probably because of the top hat crystal. Both are great watches with lots of history....I think that the GMT is more versatile (pepsi or black bezel), but the Sub (in my opinion) looks better on a nato than the GMT does. As many have said, you won't go wrong with either!!!

13 November 2015, 11:48 AM	#1
Brianlap55 Banned Join Date: Oct 2015 Location: Syracuse Posts: 42	I can't get enough of this watch Ahem...however I'm thinking of my next move...I have access to a 1680 in the same condition...or should I go GMT? Attached Images

13 November 2015, 12:06 PM	#3
SLS "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Scott Location: GMT -7 Watch: GMT's & Sub's Posts: 10,401	Red or white 1680? However, it would seem that you get more bang for you buck on a 1675. Or white 1680 and 1675 for the price of some Red 1680's! __________________ "The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922

16 November 2015, 08:17 AM	#9
Lordofrolex "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Real Name: Brandon Location: Los Angeles, CA Watch: Yes Please! Posts: 6,691	Coke gmt __________________ Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN Panerai PAM 359 Audemars Piguet RO 15300OR Follow me on Instagram: @b_jakobovich

16 November 2015, 08:58 AM	#11
subtona "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: gus Location: East Coast Watch: APK & sometimes Y Posts: 26,601	That's a beauty. __________________

16 November 2015, 11:54 AM	#14
Dr DRW "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: David Location: Dallas, Tx Watch: Divers Posts: 323	go for a 1675 first __________________ Rolex 1665, 1675, 1680, 5513, 16600, 16610, 14060

13 November 2015, 11:55 AM	#2
Scoobs "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2014 Real Name: David Location: Sydney Watch: Daytona & Sub C Posts: 206	Pepsi GMT would be my vote. The splash of colour is awesome

13 November 2015, 12:13 PM	#4
Brianlap55 Banned Join Date: Oct 2015 Location: Syracuse Posts: 42	Sorry I should have clarified white 1680

13 November 2015, 01:25 PM	#5
harry in montreal "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Montreal Watch: The Habs pick 1st! Posts: 3,589	Get both. They seem to hold their values if the dials are correct

13 November 2015, 05:14 PM	#6
Nobody.Move "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2014 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 266	Stickin' with the four digits, huh?

16 November 2015, 02:26 AM	#7
bizznatchers "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: san francisco Posts: 27	id stick with what you got!

16 November 2015, 08:00 AM	#8
Brianlap55 Banned Join Date: Oct 2015 Location: Syracuse Posts: 42	That's what I meant In addition to the 5512 not to replace it

16 November 2015, 08:22 AM	#10
strafer_kid "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Kenny Location: northern ireland Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs Posts: 5,136	1675 Pepsi especially with a hint of fade really looks well and makes for a nice change from a Sub. That said, 1680 Sub is also very nice indeed - can't go wrong with either!

16 November 2015, 09:12 AM	#12
Hi-roller "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: London UK Watch: Daytona,GMT's,1680 Posts: 283	You're asking the question so I guess you'll have to get both.

16 November 2015, 09:16 AM	#13
datejust24 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Chris Location: Cincinnati,Ohio Watch: Rolexssss Posts: 3,504	I'd go with the 1680 but have I believe a tropic 19 crystal installed (no cyclops)...I love that look

20 November 2015, 04:45 AM	#15
sishac "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Wayne Watch: Rolex 5512 Posts: 142	I've got a 1675 and a 1680...I think that the size of the GMT (mine is a 1.7M) seems a bit smaller than the 1680. That is probably because of the top hat crystal. Both are great watches with lots of history....I think that the GMT is more versatile (pepsi or black bezel), but the Sub (in my opinion) looks better on a nato than the GMT does. As many have said, you won't go wrong with either!!!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)