ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
18 November 2015, 02:18 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 273
|
I'm in the service it camp. The rate is a little fast for my taste--if it was my watch. Additionally, I would prefer to know it had been taken care of at my discression, rather than being at the mercy of waiting for the watch to malfunction.
Jeremy |
18 November 2015, 03:36 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,335
|
I think is better to service at this point (almost 15 years) get a Pepsi insert while you do it, and ask to return the black insert to you. For $72.0 is worth it, I just serviced my 16710 and no regrets.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
18 November 2015, 05:38 AM | #33 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,693
|
And I thought you just really had something against me for a reason I didn't understand. I was starting to wince every time I see you quote me. The winder alone wasn't enough, the fact that it had a lot of winding resistance had more to do with it than the winder. The winder did seriously draw my attention to it. The watch is terrific following servicing, fwiw. Considering it was a 16700 with no service history it wasn't a bad idea regardless of the reason.
|
18 November 2015, 05:39 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Brett
Location: Bahrain, Dubai
Watch: Rolex and AP
Posts: 5,538
|
I agree - if the running time is consistent then just gt a pressure check to ensure it's watertight and you'll be fine.
__________________
Photostream on Instagram brett_in_bahrain |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.