The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 November 2015, 05:40 AM   #1
chand8
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 86
Tritium V Luminova

As the patina is so sought after and discussed, would yany of you think that the tritium dial would be better bet for future appreciation and resale of, say a 14060. After 2001= superluminova or before 2001= tritium.
chand8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 November 2015, 05:46 AM   #2
Frogman4me
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
For me personally I always prefer tritium. I love patina and that is something that modern dials will never give me.
Frogman4me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 November 2015, 05:57 AM   #3
Loevhagen
"TRF" Member
 
Loevhagen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The aperture
Posts: 4,941
For a 14060, I would choose the Luminova (1998-1999) or the Super Luminova (after 2000). Tritium and WG surrounds are a mismatch. IMHO.
Loevhagen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 November 2015, 08:20 AM   #4
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by chand8 View Post
As the patina is so sought after and discussed, would yany of you think that the tritium dial would be better bet for future appreciation and resale of, say a 14060. After 2001= superluminova or before 2001= tritium.
There aren't any 14060s after 2001, they were discontinued for the 14060M in about '99.

Since the changeover to Luminova occurred in ~98/99 (Luinova and Super Luminova are the same compound) There may be a few 14060s that have it, and there may be a few 14060Ms that have tritium. Either is rare.

As to sought after, or future appreciation and resale, it likely doesn't make a lot of difference as long as the dial is original. If a Luminova dial is a replacement on a 14060 then the circle of potential owners may be reduced if you believe that there is a huge number who want originality. I think that, overall, any 14060 or 14060M in top shape will sell for about the same with or without a replacement dial - condition is paramount.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 November 2015, 08:54 AM   #5
chand8
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 86
many thanks again and very useful information.
chand8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 November 2015, 09:12 AM   #6
MitchSteel
"TRF" Member
 
MitchSteel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: MDangerSteel
Location: Canada
Watch: Vintage Rolex
Posts: 2,301
It would probably come down to personal preference.I like both, but that definitely ends on what you use the watch for I guess.
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

Probability of survival is inversely proportional to the angle of arrival---Capt. Rage

Don't believe anything in aviation, 'till V1---Mitch Danger Steel
MitchSteel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 November 2015, 11:59 AM   #7
ADINVA
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 733
Quote:
Originally Posted by loevhagen View Post
tritium and wg surrounds are a mismatch. Imho.
+1
ADINVA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 November 2015, 12:17 PM   #8
EdipisReks
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frogman4me View Post
For me personally I always prefer tritium. I love patina and that is something that modern dials will never give me.
You might be surprised: the luminova on my late 90s Seamaster Pro has turned quite brown. Also doesn't glow well anymore, so it's pretty similar to the Tritium experience. ;)
EdipisReks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2015, 02:32 AM   #9
Loevhagen
"TRF" Member
 
Loevhagen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The aperture
Posts: 4,941
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdipisReks View Post
You might be surprised: the luminova on my late 90s Seamaster Pro has turned quite brown. Also doesn't glow well anymore, so it's pretty similar to the Tritium experience. ;)
Water damaged?
Loevhagen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2015, 05:02 AM   #10
EdipisReks
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 178
No, it's actually pretty common with SMPs of the era, for whatever reason.
EdipisReks is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.