ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

SPACE-DWELLER · 18 June 2008, 11:30 PM

Nigel Tufnel · 18 June 2008, 11:40 PM

Could it be that the sweep timing hand was not in synch with the lower sub-dial? I have never owned a Daytona, but I did notice the upper right sub-dial advanced one minute as the sweep hand crossed 12, but the lower sub-dial, which I believe records 60 seconds, did not match the large sweeping hand, which also recorded some 60 plus seconds. Maybe the stopwatch hand was started and stopped and restarted. I am not very familiar with the watch, but that is what I noticed.

mfer · 18 June 2008, 11:51 PM

I see "Movie Not Loaded", must be blocked at work or something.....

Mrdi · 18 June 2008, 11:52 PM

The second hand does not maintain concentricity.

Hamilton Carvalho · 18 June 2008, 11:53 PM

He's probably bored or he has a thing for the second hand.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER

Trurolexer · 19 June 2008, 12:33 AM

Why I'm the only one here cannot see that pic?

toph · 19 June 2008, 12:59 AM

weird

zak98 · 19 June 2008, 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mrdi

The second hand does not maintain concentricity.

i think i see this as well.

JJ Irani · 19 June 2008, 04:09 AM

I see the video, but what the hell seems to be the problem?

All I see is a second hand going round and round!!

f16570 · 19 June 2008, 05:30 AM

I'm with youonthis one JJ, looks ok to me. Should there be something obvious?

RW16610 · 19 June 2008, 05:35 AM

I also missed whatever it was somehow.

Leighton · 19 June 2008, 06:14 AM

For some reason it made me think of an old children's song:

The wheels on the truck go round and round
Round and round
Round and round
The wheels on the truck go...................

infoe · 19 June 2008, 06:23 AM

I don't think theres anything wrong, I think if there was something wrong BO would most probably know what it is. He's asking if YOU get this...like theres some more meaning to the fact that his second hand is running...maybe it means he got his daytona back from service...who knows? :)

roadcarver · 19 June 2008, 06:32 AM

I'm no Daytona expert, but its just a chrono running.

scottschoe · 19 June 2008, 06:37 AM

I don't know about you guys, but that chrono hand looks really jerky to me. Could just be the camera..who knows.

DSJ · 19 June 2008, 07:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nigel Tufnel

Could it be that the sweep timing hand was not in synch with the lower sub-dial? I have never owned a Daytona, but I did notice the upper right sub-dial advanced one minute as the sweep hand crossed 12, but the lower sub-dial, which I believe records 60 seconds, did not match the large sweeping hand, which also recorded some 60 plus seconds. Maybe the stopwatch hand was started and stopped and restarted. I am not very familiar with the watch, but that is what I noticed.

That's what I was thinking...

mopsey · 19 June 2008, 07:16 AM

Eer.........................i don't know.

donutdanny · 19 June 2008, 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottschoe

I don't know about you guys, but that chrono hand looks really jerky to me. Could just be the camera..who knows.

What he said.

RW16610 · 19 June 2008, 07:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by donutdanny

What he said.

After watching it a few times I did pick up on that a little but still not sure exactly.

TheDude · 19 June 2008, 07:48 AM

If you look, the minute hand also seems to lag. It doesn't line up with the minute marker exactly until the seconds hand is around 14.

Baptistman · 19 June 2008, 07:50 AM

Andad · 19 June 2008, 07:20 PM

All looks OK to me.

What did you see Bo?

swatty · 19 June 2008, 07:49 PM

the second hand seems to skip a beat ?

SPACE-DWELLER · 20 June 2008, 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

I see the video, but what the hell seems to be the problem?

All I see is a second hand going round and round!!

Same thing here! At some point, I did some to spot the chrono hand "jumping" around the "31" marker, but when I watched the video again, I could not see anything wrong!

jdc · 20 June 2008, 12:41 AM

I think it is a Andy Warhol inspired post modernist take on the dissection of time

18 June 2008, 11:30 PM	#1
SPACE-DWELLER "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Bo Location: Denmark Watch: Rolex, of course! Posts: 22,436	Do YOU Get This?? __________________ With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...

18 June 2008, 11:51 PM	#3
mfer "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Real Name: Mik Location: USA Posts: 13,724	I see "Movie Not Loaded", must be blocked at work or something..... __________________ member#3242

19 June 2008, 12:59 AM	#7
toph "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: ChrisTOPHer Location: Sydney Watch: Rolex, Brellum, Posts: 12,601	weird __________________ "Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety." Member No.# 11795

19 June 2008, 04:09 AM	#9
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	I see the video, but what the hell seems to be the problem? All I see is a second hand going round and round!! __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

19 June 2008, 05:30 AM	#10
f16570 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: F Location: Scotland Watch: Exp II White Face Posts: 4,272	I'm with youonthis one JJ, looks ok to me. Should there be something obvious? __________________ Why have what's new when you have what's best. f

18 June 2008, 11:40 PM	#2
Nigel Tufnel Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Grosse Pointe, MI Posts: 420	Could it be that the sweep timing hand was not in synch with the lower sub-dial? I have never owned a Daytona, but I did notice the upper right sub-dial advanced one minute as the sweep hand crossed 12, but the lower sub-dial, which I believe records 60 seconds, did not match the large sweeping hand, which also recorded some 60 plus seconds. Maybe the stopwatch hand was started and stopped and restarted. I am not very familiar with the watch, but that is what I noticed.

18 June 2008, 11:52 PM	#4
Mrdi Banned Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Posts: 3,478	The second hand does not maintain concentricity.

19 June 2008, 12:33 AM	#6
Trurolexer Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: USA Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex Posts: 18,421	Why I'm the only one here cannot see that pic?

19 June 2008, 05:35 AM	#11
RW16610 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Rommel Location: Toronto Canada Watch: 116710LN Posts: 9,203	I also missed whatever it was somehow.

19 June 2008, 06:14 AM	#12
Leighton "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Leighton Location: So. California Watch: SS GMT IIc Posts: 1,366	For some reason it made me think of an old children's song: The wheels on the truck go round and round Round and round Round and round The wheels on the truck go................... __________________ GMT MASTER II 116710N

19 June 2008, 06:23 AM	#13
infoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Real Name: Jose Location: Miami, FL Watch: '06 SS DJ OYSTER Posts: 260	I don't think theres anything wrong, I think if there was something wrong BO would most probably know what it is. He's asking if YOU get this...like theres some more meaning to the fact that his second hand is running...maybe it means he got his daytona back from service...who knows? :)

19 June 2008, 06:32 AM	#14
roadcarver "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Vernon Location: C-a-n-a-d-a Watch: 16600 Posts: 5,641	I'm no Daytona expert, but its just a chrono running. __________________ I'm just a cook...

19 June 2008, 06:37 AM	#15
scottschoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: CA Posts: 3,295	I don't know about you guys, but that chrono hand looks really jerky to me. Could just be the camera..who knows. __________________ __________________

19 June 2008, 07:16 AM	#17
mopsey "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Martin Location: London Watch: Sub,Exp2,BlkBy,SD Posts: 1,258	Eer.........................i don't know. __________________ Lest we forget.

19 June 2008, 07:48 AM	#20
TheDude "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: DC Area, USA Watch: IIc,1680 Red,16660 Posts: 4,492	If you look, the minute hand also seems to lag. It doesn't line up with the minute marker exactly until the seconds hand is around 14.

19 June 2008, 07:50 AM	#21
Baptistman "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Real Name: Jon Location: UK Posts: 2,405	__________________ Whatever the watch, it's your wrist, it speaks to you, enjoy it

19 June 2008, 07:20 PM	#22
Andad 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Eddie Location: Australia Watch: A few. Posts: 37,533	All looks OK to me. What did you see Bo? __________________ E

19 June 2008, 07:49 PM	#23
swatty 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Peter Location: Sydney Watch: The Game Posts: 17,415	the second hand seems to skip a beat ?

20 June 2008, 12:41 AM	#25
jdc "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Martin Location: UK Posts: 7,023	I think it is a Andy Warhol inspired post modernist take on the dissection of time

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)