ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

ryansoulsit · 8 February 2016, 08:35 PM

Which one should I get between an Ex1 36mm or Sub C No date?

Thank you.

travisb · 8 February 2016, 08:44 PM

Both are great historical classics. The decision is yours but I give the slight edge to the Sub.

oak3x · 8 February 2016, 08:47 PM

I vote for the Explorer, as it looks great with either business or casual attire.

doozyj · 8 February 2016, 08:56 PM

Sub no date.

itsmekevin · 8 February 2016, 08:56 PM

They're both great. I'm starting to prefer the Explorers now.. Even thinking about selling my Sub C date for one. Can't go wrong with either.

1William · 8 February 2016, 09:05 PM

I prefer the Sub but both are great watches.

fskywalker · 8 February 2016, 09:08 PM

Comparisson is odd as size is quite different; why not comparing the Explorer 1 39 mm instead versus the Sub C ND?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

TeeBee97 · 8 February 2016, 09:09 PM

Definitely the Sub!

ryansoulsit · 8 February 2016, 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fskywalker

Comparisson is odd as size is quite different; why not comparing the Explorer 1 39 mm instead versus the Sub C ND?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think I like 36mm more than 39mm.

Justinmg · 8 February 2016, 09:46 PM

I've had both explorers and the subc. I ended up flipping them all, But if I had to decide I'd pick the Subc. I'd also consider the SDc or 14060

Dubarzy · 8 February 2016, 09:47 PM

Exp is my pick.

brandrea · 8 February 2016, 09:48 PM

Tough call. I'd give a slight edge to the Sub, but honestly the Explorer is a beauty too.
No wrong answer here

bigwatchman · 8 February 2016, 09:52 PM

Both great. Exp if you want to be different from everyone else out there. Sub if you want larger watch and an instant classic. Good luck.

cop414 · 8 February 2016, 09:56 PM

If it's going to be your one and only I'd go with the Explorer. Have you tried both on? As said above there's quite a size difference between the two. It'd be much more comparable comparison between the Explorer and a 14060 Submariner.

Mick P · 8 February 2016, 10:00 PM

I would opt for the Explorer purely because it is truly understated.

The Sub looks a bit casual whilst the Explorer can be worn with anything ranging from jeans and T shirt to an evening jacket.

Regards

Mick

joe100 · 8 February 2016, 10:13 PM

Explorer of course

ragingcao · 8 February 2016, 10:16 PM

My vote would be Sub LV C. Go big or go home if you're going to get a SS sub.
But if subtlety is the name of the game then Exp 36mm.

No wrong choice really.

paltak · 8 February 2016, 10:36 PM

Both are nice but the 36mm Exp is a classic. Plus it's about a third of the price.

AK1984 · 8 February 2016, 10:41 PM

Have you considered 14060M?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Rolthai32 · 8 February 2016, 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by travisb

both are great historical classics. The decision is yours but i give the slight edge to the sub.

+1

zjd168 · 8 February 2016, 10:55 PM

sub

subtona · 8 February 2016, 11:17 PM

The exp 1 looks better w your attire.

Lightforce1911 · 8 February 2016, 11:25 PM

Sub

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

UncleSwiss · 8 February 2016, 11:28 PM

Sub C no question about it...Exp I is to small for my taste.

polk1 · 8 February 2016, 11:31 PM

sub

cburgs56 · 9 February 2016, 12:34 AM

Sub

sickened1 · 9 February 2016, 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ryansoulsit

Which one should I get between an Ex1 36mm or Sub C No date?

Both.

RollyFan98012 · 9 February 2016, 12:58 AM

Sub C ND

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Ancestral Star · 9 February 2016, 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joe100

Explorer of course

I second this thought.

Acero · 9 February 2016, 01:37 AM

If you find an explorer I 36mm in minty condition, buy it. You always have time to buy de sub C.

8 February 2016, 08:35 PM	#1
ryansoulsit 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2015 Location: USA Posts: 3,011	Ex1 36mm vs Sub C No date Which one should I get between an Ex1 36mm or Sub C No date? Thank you.

8 February 2016, 09:08 PM	#7
fskywalker 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Real Name: Francisco Location: San Juan, PR Watch: Is Ticking ! Posts: 25,183	Ex1 36mm vs Sub C No date Comparisson is odd as size is quite different; why not comparing the Explorer 1 39 mm instead versus the Sub C ND? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled

8 February 2016, 09:52 PM	#13
bigwatchman "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: Scott Location: North Carolina Posts: 1,307	Both great. Exp if you want to be different from everyone else out there. Sub if you want larger watch and an instant classic. Good luck. __________________ Waiting for Arrival... Omega Seamaster 120 Automatic Luminox 3950 Orange Luminox Field Watch Day-Date Casio G-Shock Analog/Chrono

8 February 2016, 09:56 PM	#14
cop414 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Tim Location: Pennsylvania Watch: 14060M Posts: 72,258	If it's going to be your one and only I'd go with the Explorer. Have you tried both on? As said above there's quite a size difference between the two. It'd be much more comparable comparison between the Explorer and a 14060 Submariner. __________________ Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED

8 February 2016, 10:13 PM	#16
joe100 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Joe Location: New Mexico Watch: Explorer Posts: 12,840	Explorer of course __________________ It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982-

8 February 2016, 08:44 PM	#2
travisb 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 33,493	Both are great historical classics. The decision is yours but I give the slight edge to the Sub.

8 February 2016, 08:47 PM	#3
oak3x 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Real Name: Dave Location: New Jersey Posts: 68	I vote for the Explorer, as it looks great with either business or casual attire.

8 February 2016, 08:56 PM	#4
doozyj "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Los Angeles Watch: DSSD Posts: 205	Sub no date.

8 February 2016, 08:56 PM	#5
itsmekevin "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2015 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 125	They're both great. I'm starting to prefer the Explorers now.. Even thinking about selling my Sub C date for one. Can't go wrong with either.

8 February 2016, 09:05 PM	#6
1William 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: North Carolina Watch: Rolex/Others Posts: 47,787	I prefer the Sub but both are great watches.

8 February 2016, 09:09 PM	#8
TeeBee97 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Real Name: Teodor Location: Stockholm, Sweden Watch: SubC 114060 Posts: 83	Definitely the Sub!

8 February 2016, 09:46 PM	#10
Justinmg "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Real Name: Justin Location: FL Watch: PO/EXPL Posts: 3,371	I've had both explorers and the subc. I ended up flipping them all, But if I had to decide I'd pick the Subc. I'd also consider the SDc or 14060

8 February 2016, 09:47 PM	#11
Dubarzy "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2015 Real Name: Wesley Location: Austin Watch: 214270 Posts: 630	Exp is my pick.

8 February 2016, 09:48 PM	#12
brandrea 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Brian (TBone) Location: canada Watch: es make me smile Posts: 78,129	Tough call. I'd give a slight edge to the Sub, but honestly the Explorer is a beauty too. No wrong answer here

8 February 2016, 10:00 PM	#15
Mick P Banned Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: UK / Spain Watch: 39mm Explorer Posts: 1,990	I would opt for the Explorer purely because it is truly understated. The Sub looks a bit casual whilst the Explorer can be worn with anything ranging from jeans and T shirt to an evening jacket. Regards Mick

8 February 2016, 10:16 PM	#17
ragingcao "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: Tokyo Watch: cha talking about? Posts: 2,919	My vote would be Sub LV C. Go big or go home if you're going to get a SS sub. But if subtlety is the name of the game then Exp 36mm. No wrong choice really.

8 February 2016, 10:36 PM	#18
paltak "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Real Name: Bob Location: IL Posts: 825	Both are nice but the 36mm Exp is a classic. Plus it's about a third of the price.

8 February 2016, 10:41 PM	#19
AK1984 Banned Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: Hickory Posts: 243	Have you considered 14060M? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

8 February 2016, 10:55 PM	#21
zjd168 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: US Posts: 2,698	sub

8 February 2016, 11:17 PM	#22
subtona "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: gus Location: East Coast Watch: APK & sometimes Y Posts: 26,601	The exp 1 looks better w your attire. __________________

8 February 2016, 11:25 PM	#23
Lightforce1911 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Location: evanston Posts: 260	Sub Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

8 February 2016, 11:28 PM	#24
UncleSwiss "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Real Name: Dylan Location: U.K Watch: Rolex/AP Posts: 133	Sub C no question about it...Exp I is to small for my taste.

8 February 2016, 11:31 PM	#25
polk1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Location: Toronto Watch: Rolex, Tudor, Tag Posts: 83	sub

9 February 2016, 12:34 AM	#26
cburgs56 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2014 Location: TEXAS Watch: 116610 LV Posts: 417	Sub

9 February 2016, 12:58 AM	#28
RollyFan98012 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: US Watch: DSSD,PAM Posts: 573	Sub C ND Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

9 February 2016, 01:37 AM	#30
Acero "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: Spain Posts: 14	If you find an explorer I 36mm in minty condition, buy it. You always have time to buy de sub C.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)