ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Wcdhtwn · 4 March 2016, 01:41 PM

Both are great but for a GMT tool I think one with a rotating bezel is more functional.

CRM114 · 4 March 2016, 02:02 PM

BLNR...
1) It's good-looking no matter what.
2) A pilot's watch will do nicely in your collection.
3) It's great for timing critical things like how long it actually takes when the guy/girl at the drive-through window says "Could you please pull forward, your double Quarter Pounder with cheese will be right out".

Rolexing24_7 · 4 March 2016, 02:15 PM

blnr all day

superstarmar · 4 March 2016, 02:19 PM

BLNR !!!
A timeless pilots watch !!!
Versatile and functional at the same time ...
You already have an explorer 1...why would u need
a number 2....

Esthetically, just a go to watch all around ...
Perfection !!!

PS... I recently used mine for timing critical data...

Fed · 4 March 2016, 03:22 PM

I agree with those who suggest to get both, if money is not a concern. I recently got a BLNR for much more. And both watches are beautiful in their own ways.

sea-dweller · 4 March 2016, 03:36 PM

Explorer II (I'm in the minority).

Timesurfer · 4 March 2016, 04:02 PM

BLNR but i'm biased

DocHorton · 4 March 2016, 04:24 PM

I have both and if only choosing one I would go with the BLNR. In fact, if I could only have one SS Rolex that would be it.

scombs263 · 4 March 2016, 04:41 PM

Go get the BLNR......

amg55 · 4 March 2016, 08:43 PM

BLNR will get more attention than Exp II. Which do you prefer? Stealth or bling?

RRGHOST1 · 4 March 2016, 09:51 PM

Explorer2 Polar for me.

hornchurch · 4 March 2016, 09:56 PM

I must admit i like a white dial for a change.

thefatboy · 4 March 2016, 10:17 PM

I was in the same position, ended up with the BLNR. I would say though, if you haven't already, try them on first!

A lot of people feel that the EXP II wears very big, this wasn't an issue for me as my wrists are 7.5+ (I'm wearing a huge 46mm 16mm thick cheap German dive watch atm!

) but for many this is a big issue with the new Explorer II.

In the end, for me, I just preferred the BLNR, it's my first Rolex and was a grail for me, I was only looking at the Explorer as I didn't think I could source the BLNR.

You can't really go wrong whichever you choose, they're both special pieces. I know I've been absolutely no help, sorry, and in that vein can I also just play the TRF Enabler for a moment and say.....get both!!

Good luck in choosing and wear the winner in good health.

m1911a1 · 4 March 2016, 11:13 PM

I think the Explorers 1 & 2 are the coolest watches Rolex produces....
You already have a very nice collection, and with a smaller wrist I'm sure they ALL look great on you.
(If the Explorer-1 was 42mm, it would be the only watch I'd own, but I personally bought a pair of 42mm Explorer-2's for my 8-inch wrist)

I wore a Submariner from the early 80's for a long time, but everyone seems to own a Sub-GMT-Rotating-Bezel Rolex.

In 35 years I've never ONCE rotated my bezel....and I used to Scuba Dive.

On my Explorer-II's I always keep the 24 hour hand set at the relative 24 hour position.

beshannon · 4 March 2016, 11:42 PM

I chose the BLNR when faced with that choice.

I have no idea what you will do.

ncboiler · 5 March 2016, 12:16 AM

I chose the BLNR as well. I had originally planned on the Explorer II but once I saw the BLNR I couldn't pass it up.

Rocco21 · 5 March 2016, 01:12 AM

Blnr

BNA/LION · 5 March 2016, 01:25 AM

Gmt blnr

Robb · 5 March 2016, 03:15 AM

I have both and love both. But if only one..... BLNR

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

japenney · 5 March 2016, 03:17 AM

You guys might have convinced me to get both....i would be able to purchase either immediately. However, the second one the AD has offered to hold for me and "lock in" the price and i could pay it off slowly over several months with no interest or anything. Sound ok to you guys?

Sportwatchmania · 5 March 2016, 04:29 AM

With your wrist size the EXP might be a bit to big. But that's a lame excuse for me to say BLNR

tbh i love the EXP but only with the white dial. On a serious note the 40mm probably fits you better

Good luck and enjoy your new watch

brace786 · 5 March 2016, 05:04 AM

the sub c and the BLNR have similar design .... would go for the explorer2 for that reason

MattyL147 · 5 March 2016, 05:19 AM

BLNR hands down.

GhostWriter · 5 March 2016, 05:23 AM

My wrist is 6.75 as well and I own both. The BLNR by far wears better and is my favorite of the two.

Spartacus · 6 March 2016, 03:07 AM

Pcls important to you?

Brucie D · 6 March 2016, 03:40 AM

I have the BLNR and was so thrilled about it I wrote an article that may help you:

http://timeandtidewatches.com/rolex-...i-blnr-review/

But my next watch might be an ExpII.

Happy shopping!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

KrismanX · 6 March 2016, 03:57 AM

Based on what you have, the BLNR is the comfortable choice for you... That being said, with what you have I would go Explorer II!! It will be a great contrast in your collection, and it is a DAMNED fine piece of candy.

And if I may add, the white face on the ExpII is just...

WatchinMD · 6 March 2016, 05:20 AM

BLNR for me

japenney · 6 March 2016, 06:16 AM

Thanks for the replies. I think i will go blnr first and add exp 2. They are both beautiful in their own way.

Eric Chan · 6 March 2016, 10:55 AM

Blnr.

4 March 2016, 03:36 PM	#36
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	Explorer II (I'm in the minority). __________________ TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)

4 March 2016, 09:51 PM	#41
RRGHOST1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: luke standing Location: england Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue Posts: 3,997	Explorer2 Polar for me. __________________ RRGHOST1

4 March 2016, 10:17 PM	#43
thefatboy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Location: UK Watch: BLNR Posts: 101	I was in the same position, ended up with the BLNR. I would say though, if you haven't already, try them on first! A lot of people feel that the EXP II wears very big, this wasn't an issue for me as my wrists are 7.5+ (I'm wearing a huge 46mm 16mm thick cheap German dive watch atm!) but for many this is a big issue with the new Explorer II. In the end, for me, I just preferred the BLNR, it's my first Rolex and was a grail for me, I was only looking at the Explorer as I didn't think I could source the BLNR. You can't really go wrong whichever you choose, they're both special pieces. I know I've been absolutely no help, sorry, and in that vein can I also just play the TRF Enabler for a moment and say.....get both!! Good luck in choosing and wear the winner in good health.

4 March 2016, 11:42 PM	#45
beshannon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: Northern Virginia Watch: One of Not Many Posts: 17,892	I chose the BLNR when faced with that choice. I have no idea what you will do. __________________ IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock

5 March 2016, 01:25 AM	#48
BNA/LION 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Larry Location: San Diego, CA Watch: ROLEX Posts: 25,663	Gmt blnr __________________ ✦ 28238 President DD 18K/YG ✦ 16610LN SS Sub ✦ 16613 18K/SS Serti ✦ 16550 Exp II Non-Rail Cream Dial ✦ Daytona C 116500 ✦ 126710 BLRO GMT-Master II ✦ NEXT-->? ⛳ Hole In One! 10/3/19 DMCC 5th hole, par 3, 168 yards w/ 4-Iron.

4 March 2016, 01:41 PM	#31
Wcdhtwn "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2015 Location: Houston Watch: SkyD, SD43, GMT2 Posts: 5,061	Both are great but for a GMT tool I think one with a rotating bezel is more functional.

4 March 2016, 02:02 PM	#32
CRM114 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: HK & USA Watch: GMTs,1803, 16610LV Posts: 2,001	BLNR... 1) It's good-looking no matter what. 2) A pilot's watch will do nicely in your collection. 3) It's great for timing critical things like how long it actually takes when the guy/girl at the drive-through window says "Could you please pull forward, your double Quarter Pounder with cheese will be right out".

4 March 2016, 02:15 PM	#33
Rolexing24_7 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2015 Real Name: @rolexing24_7 Location: Miami Watch: DAYTONAS Posts: 492	blnr all day

4 March 2016, 02:19 PM	#34
superstarmar Banned Join Date: Jun 2015 Location: In Motion Watch: my wrist presence Posts: 7,436	BLNR !!! A timeless pilots watch !!! Versatile and functional at the same time ... You already have an explorer 1...why would u need a number 2.... Esthetically, just a go to watch all around ... Perfection !!! PS... I recently used mine for timing critical data...

4 March 2016, 03:22 PM	#35
Fed "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Hong Kong Posts: 49	I agree with those who suggest to get both, if money is not a concern. I recently got a BLNR for much more. And both watches are beautiful in their own ways.

4 March 2016, 04:02 PM	#37
Timesurfer "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: 12,000+ Lakes! Watch: 16710 Daytona BLNR Posts: 840	BLNR but i'm biased

4 March 2016, 04:24 PM	#38
DocHorton "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: God Bless Texas Watch: Smurf, DD40, SkyD. Posts: 1,517	I have both and if only choosing one I would go with the BLNR. In fact, if I could only have one SS Rolex that would be it.

4 March 2016, 04:41 PM	#39
scombs263 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2014 Real Name: COMBS#263 Location: Los Angeles, Ca. Watch: Rolex SD43 Posts: 2,193	Go get the BLNR......

4 March 2016, 08:43 PM	#40
amg55 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: Me Location: Australia Watch: Daytona 116500LN Posts: 677	BLNR will get more attention than Exp II. Which do you prefer? Stealth or bling?

4 March 2016, 09:56 PM	#42
hornchurch "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2015 Real Name: Tony Location: london Watch: Datejust 11 Posts: 356	I must admit i like a white dial for a change.

4 March 2016, 11:13 PM	#44
m1911a1 Banned Join Date: Jun 2010 Real Name: Mark Location: Maine, USA Watch: 42mm Explorer-II's Posts: 489	I think the Explorers 1 & 2 are the coolest watches Rolex produces.... You already have a very nice collection, and with a smaller wrist I'm sure they ALL look great on you. (If the Explorer-1 was 42mm, it would be the only watch I'd own, but I personally bought a pair of 42mm Explorer-2's for my 8-inch wrist) I wore a Submariner from the early 80's for a long time, but everyone seems to own a Sub-GMT-Rotating-Bezel Rolex. In 35 years I've never ONCE rotated my bezel....and I used to Scuba Dive. On my Explorer-II's I always keep the 24 hour hand set at the relative 24 hour position.

5 March 2016, 12:16 AM	#46
ncboiler "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2015 Location: Indiana Watch: BLNR Posts: 114	I chose the BLNR as well. I had originally planned on the Explorer II but once I saw the BLNR I couldn't pass it up.

5 March 2016, 01:12 AM	#47
Rocco21 Banned Join Date: Jan 2016 Real Name: Rob Location: Cape Cod Watch: 126660,126600 Posts: 1,324	Blnr

5 March 2016, 03:15 AM	#49
Robb 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Real Name: Robb Location: USA Watch: BLNR Posts: 4,939	I have both and love both. But if only one..... BLNR Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ 126610LN l 166610LV l 126619LB l 116710BLNR l 126710BLRO l 126720VTNR l 126718GRNR l 116500 white l 116500 black l 116508 john mayer l 116519LN l 116503 white l 126655 l 226627 Ti Master l 116518LN

5 March 2016, 03:17 AM	#50
japenney "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Real Name: Josh Location: Canada Watch: undecided Posts: 4,777	You guys might have convinced me to get both....i would be able to purchase either immediately. However, the second one the AD has offered to hold for me and "lock in" the price and i could pay it off slowly over several months with no interest or anything. Sound ok to you guys?

5 March 2016, 04:29 AM	#51
Sportwatchmania "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: Dennis Location: Netherlands Watch: ♛ Posts: 552	With your wrist size the EXP might be a bit to big. But that's a lame excuse for me to say BLNR tbh i love the EXP but only with the white dial. On a serious note the 40mm probably fits you better Good luck and enjoy your new watch __________________ ♛ 116610LN - 116710BLNR - 116500LN White - 116500LN Black Instagram: @sportwatchmania https://instagram.com/sportwatchmania/

5 March 2016, 05:04 AM	#52
brace786 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2015 Location: US Posts: 71	the sub c and the BLNR have similar design .... would go for the explorer2 for that reason

5 March 2016, 05:19 AM	#53
MattyL147 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: USA Posts: 1,207	BLNR hands down.

5 March 2016, 05:23 AM	#54
GhostWriter "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Darrin Location: All Along The Watch: tower Posts: 197	My wrist is 6.75 as well and I own both. The BLNR by far wears better and is my favorite of the two.

6 March 2016, 03:07 AM	#55
Spartacus "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: DC Watch: Daytona Posts: 2,745	Pcls important to you?

6 March 2016, 03:40 AM	#56
Brucie D "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Real Name: Bruce Location: Saskatoon SK CAN Watch: DJ / BLNR / SUBCLV Posts: 1,381	I have the BLNR and was so thrilled about it I wrote an article that may help you: http://timeandtidewatches.com/rolex-...i-blnr-review/ But my next watch might be an ExpII. Happy shopping! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

6 March 2016, 03:57 AM	#57
KrismanX "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2014 Real Name: Kristofer Location: Los Angeles, CA Watch: my feet. Posts: 2,364	Based on what you have, the BLNR is the comfortable choice for you... That being said, with what you have I would go Explorer II!! It will be a great contrast in your collection, and it is a DAMNED fine piece of candy. And if I may add, the white face on the ExpII is just...

6 March 2016, 05:20 AM	#58
WatchinMD "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2014 Real Name: Larry Location: Maryland Watch: Saxonia Moonphase Posts: 3,428	BLNR for me

6 March 2016, 06:16 AM	#59
japenney "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Real Name: Josh Location: Canada Watch: undecided Posts: 4,777	Thanks for the replies. I think i will go blnr first and add exp 2. They are both beautiful in their own way.

6 March 2016, 10:55 AM	#60
Eric Chan "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Eric Chan Location: Vancouver, BC CAN Watch: Day-Date 118238 Posts: 8,798	Blnr.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)