ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

jbsmith · 10 March 2016, 02:28 PM

I would. Love my 233, as it's my favorite pam. Good luck and look fwd to the incoming. :)

MoonExplorer · 10 March 2016, 04:41 PM

Don't have a 233 but if I were to buy a PAM, it's definitely the 233.

Don't care much for the BLNR but I wouldn't trade it for a 233 only because you have a 111 for that.

Save a little more, sell the 111, add the cash and buy the 233. Keep the Rolex.

Al1969 · 12 March 2016, 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MoonExplorer

Don't have a 233 but if I were to buy a PAM, it's definitely the 233.

Don't care much for the BLNR but I wouldn't trade it for a 233 only because you have a 111 for that.

Save a little more, sell the 111, add the cash and buy the 233. Keep the Rolex.

I think this is the direction I'm gonna go.

Mastergreenhand · 12 March 2016, 01:23 PM

You'll end up selling the 111 anyway if you get the 233, so might as well just send that one off and add cash.

A320 · 12 March 2016, 02:25 PM

keep the BLNR... IMO

gktii · 26 March 2016, 10:54 AM

I tend to agree with everyone here, that you should let the 111 go and add cash to get the 233...They are right, once you have the 233, you'll never wear the 111 again. And i have the 233 Dot, and it's an amazing watch. There's just something about that domes sapphire that just sings to me. You will love it....Good luck!

hbombkid · 27 March 2016, 02:55 AM

I would say do what your heart says. I just traded my BLNR for a 1940 512 and some cash coming to me. I already bought a oem brown strap to change up the look.

I had two Rolexes in 2 years both flipped and maybe I will flip the Pam one day but that's kinda the fun part especially for breaking even and not losing money.

zjd168 · 25 May 2016, 10:11 PM

I won't do it

RollyFan98012 · 26 May 2016, 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nick c

I would trade for the 233 it's awesome I'm not a big fan of the Blnr.

I would do the same as Nick

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

rouxeny · 29 May 2016, 05:23 PM

Depends on what other watches you have.

Personally, I would do it.

233 is a really nice looking watch.

Al1969 · 30 May 2016, 03:08 PM

Thanks everyone for your input. I did get the 233, but traded my 111 towards it plus $$. This way allowed me to hold on to my BLNR.

Watcheroo · 31 May 2016, 06:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al1969

Thanks everyone for your input. I did get the 233, but traded my 111 towards it plus $$. This way allowed me to hold on to my BLNR.

Sounds like the right move. Congrats and enjoy!!

red1108nyc · 31 May 2016, 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Watcheroo

Sounds like the right move. Congrats and enjoy!!

Smart portfolio management.

Al1969 · 3 June 2016, 07:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by red1108nyc

Smart portfolio management.

Thanks guys.

chazha · 5 June 2016, 09:32 AM

For me a Pam has to stay simple. I would not want more than a date a second hand on my dial.. any other additional technical functions would be too "unpam" for me. But that's just me.

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk

10 March 2016, 04:41 PM	#32
MoonExplorer "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2014 Location: Manila Posts: 79	Blnr for 233 ? Don't have a 233 but if I were to buy a PAM, it's definitely the 233. Don't care much for the BLNR but I wouldn't trade it for a 233 only because you have a 111 for that. Save a little more, sell the 111, add the cash and buy the 233. Keep the Rolex.

12 March 2016, 01:23 PM	#34
Mastergreenhand "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Real Name: Tony Location: Chi-town Watch: Starbucks, Panerai Posts: 1,188	You'll end up selling the 111 anyway if you get the 233, so might as well just send that one off and add cash. __________________ Starbucks, Speedmaster Professional, PAM 212

30 May 2016, 03:08 PM	#41
Al1969 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: New Jersey Posts: 6,640	Thanks everyone for your input. I did get the 233, but traded my 111 towards it plus $$. This way allowed me to hold on to my BLNR. __________________ WG SUB-116719 GMT MASTER II 126719

5 June 2016, 09:32 AM	#45
chazha "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: ChairmanMao Location: NY, US Watch: mickey watch Posts: 837	For me a Pam has to stay simple. I would not want more than a date a second hand on my dial.. any other additional technical functions would be too "unpam" for me. But that's just me. Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk __________________ I am always single, even when I am married.

10 March 2016, 02:28 PM	#31
jbsmith "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Blake Location: US Watch: Daytonas Posts: 1,869	I would. Love my 233, as it's my favorite pam. Good luck and look fwd to the incoming. :)

12 March 2016, 02:25 PM	#35
A320 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: in the sky Posts: 208	keep the BLNR... IMO

26 March 2016, 10:54 AM	#36
gktii "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2015 Real Name: Gerry Location: Virginia Watch: Rolex DSSD D-Blue Posts: 71	I tend to agree with everyone here, that you should let the 111 go and add cash to get the 233...They are right, once you have the 233, you'll never wear the 111 again. And i have the 233 Dot, and it's an amazing watch. There's just something about that domes sapphire that just sings to me. You will love it....Good luck!

27 March 2016, 02:55 AM	#37
hbombkid "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2014 Location: VA Watch: Sub 116610 Posts: 1,082	I would say do what your heart says. I just traded my BLNR for a 1940 512 and some cash coming to me. I already bought a oem brown strap to change up the look. I had two Rolexes in 2 years both flipped and maybe I will flip the Pam one day but that's kinda the fun part especially for breaking even and not losing money.

25 May 2016, 10:11 PM	#38
zjd168 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: US Posts: 2,698	I won't do it

29 May 2016, 05:23 PM	#40
rouxeny "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Real Name: Andrew Location: Maui Posts: 686	Depends on what other watches you have. Personally, I would do it. 233 is a really nice looking watch.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)