The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18 March 2016, 07:57 AM   #91
joli160
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joli160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamiKssiaa View Post
That picture makes the steel bezel version look better, I can't lie
In my eyes as well
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.
joli160 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 08:01 AM   #92
jessiethe3rd
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 316
Here's my take. The ceramic is stunning. I'm now sitting on a DeepSea D-Blue. I have the SS Daytona and I will be honest... the DeepSea really has a hard time leaving my wrist. The presence is just very solid.

I am floored by the Daytona SS-C. It is a very nice watch but it'd need to PROBABLY be an addition and not a replacement. The SS is so much more classy but I will say that the white faced SS-C is a thing of beauty. The reason why I bring up that DeepSea D-Blue is the ceramic bezel is a look that is best served up on that beast. Scratched or not (which it cleans up well if you know what you are doing...) the SS Daytona is hard to resist for it's classic look.

May... have... to... splurge...though...

My girlfriend has been trying to steal my SS Daytona. She seems to really approve of the new look. Then again, it may be a ruse to get me off my Daytona. These women are so tricky now days. She'll force me to buy it at least that's how I put the spin... "she made me do it... I'm so weak..."
jessiethe3rd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 08:02 AM   #93
RUK
"TRF" Member
 
RUK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Ruk
Location: .ie
Watch: 5711,Sub,Daytona,P
Posts: 1,232
Both good looking watches. I had a chance to buy a Daytona many a time over the last 4 years by passed for three reasons. The bezel scratches, the size and the sub-dial colour/legibility.

The new one has fixed two of the issues and the ceramic bezel may make the size appear larger.

So the new one goes straight in my basket!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
'The best watch out there is the one you like the most'
RUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 09:50 AM   #94
GsurgBM
"TRF" Member
 
GsurgBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough
Posts: 3,759
Quote:
Originally Posted by bongtris View Post
Glad i have the black ss. Will def add the white daytonaC.

Sent from my SM-N9208 using Tapatalk

Exactly my plan.
__________________
Rolex • Tudor • Omega • Panerai
GsurgBM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 10:09 AM   #95
al503
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Oregon
Watch: DD40, SD43
Posts: 370
Both look great.

One of the main reasons I've not acquired a Daytona, even though it's 40mm was that it looked too small on my wrist (8"). The black bezel solves that issue for me.
al503 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 01:02 PM   #96
WristEnvy
"TRF" Member
 
WristEnvy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: Ray
Location: Berkeley, CA
Watch: IG @watch.kakashi
Posts: 2,579
Quote:
Originally Posted by bongtris View Post
Glad i have the black ss. Will def add the white daytonaC.

Sent from my SM-N9208 using Tapatalk
Glad I have the white SS. Will def add the black DaytonaC.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
WristEnvy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 02:33 PM   #97
Syfret
"TRF" Member
 
Syfret's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Syfret
Location: Cape Town, ZA
Watch: 116610, 116520
Posts: 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by joli160 View Post
In my eyes as well

Another vote for the SS. On Wednesday I got carried away in the initial hype and even mailed my AD to reserve a SSC but now I'm thinking hmmmmmm. The SS just looks like a far more polished (pun intended) watch in my eyes. Reckon I'll stick with my white dial SS and SubC combination 😉


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Syfret is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 03:12 PM   #98
Ckci
"TRF" Member
 
Ckci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Russell
Location: KC, MO
Watch: FedEx 4 next 1
Posts: 2,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by lmcgbaj View Post
Ceramic by far. Looks cleaner and sharper. I love it.

It's probably my new favorite SS Rolex by far. Blockbuster for Rolex.
I'm with you. I don't like the shiny bezel of the previous Daytonas is either SS nor WG or YG. The Ceramic bezel is a huge step forward by going back to the look of the past which I much prefer. I put my name on the list with my AD for SS white today at 6:32pm. By that time I was already number 6! Bummer. Hopefully the people ahead of me change their minds. I've been really busy and didn't even realize the new release had happened until Rick "Invstr" texted me. He's number #1 on the list in Houston. Russell.
Ckci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 03:47 PM   #99
Ed99
"TRF" Member
 
Ed99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Toronto MapleLeaf
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 235
Ceramic for the win. Looks a lot sharper and good contrast.
Ed99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 03:54 PM   #100
blcblc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 2,300
Both are nice but ceramic for me
blcblc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 03:59 PM   #101
Maxy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,231
Cermaic looks sharp in this video review (albeit still smaller size) http://timeandtidewatches.com/gone-i...-video-review/
Maxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 04:27 PM   #102
And1dre
"TRF" Member
 
And1dre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Silicon Valley
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 4,182
I'm really liking the ceramic. Seems a lot easier to read also, at least from all the pictures I've seen.
And1dre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 05:40 PM   #103
Kevan
"TRF" Member
 
Kevan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: England/Dubai
Watch: the one on my arm.
Posts: 923
Quote....

"I am so sorry and realise the reaction this may incur.

Does anyone else think it has lost a little of it's classical look?

I'll have the Platona - stunning - different. But the steel is now looking like the Platona, all be it in the brown...

Open the gates of hell...."
Kevan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 05:51 PM   #104
Qtip.416
"TRF" Member
 
Qtip.416's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Toronto, Canada
Watch: 1675/1016/5513
Posts: 105
Does anyone know the dimensions of the new SSC?
Qtip.416 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 05:53 PM   #105
Flat6
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 13
Much prefer the SS bezel. More elegant and classy. Ceramic is more sporty. Both are beautiful but 116520 all the way for me.
Flat6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 05:59 PM   #106
crowncollection
"TRF" Member
 
crowncollection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
Ceramic bezel is a winner


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many
crowncollection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 06:29 PM   #107
Sarko
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 478
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qtip.416 View Post
Does anyone know the dimensions of the new SSC?
They are identical
Sarko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 06:39 PM   #108
BlackBay1
"TRF" Member
 
BlackBay1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: UK
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 739
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevan View Post
Quote....

"I am so sorry and realise the reaction this may incur.

Does anyone else think it has lost a little of it's classical look?

I'll have the Platona - stunning - different. But the steel is now looking like the Platona, all be it in the brown...

Open the gates of hell...."
I was looking at the history of the Daytona and the four digit references in particular and there is a mixture of acrylic and steel bezels which give that different look. I think the new ceramic versions are just a modern take on that to be honest and could quite happily work side by side with the steel.

I think it's the evolution not revolution process which Rolex seems to do so well at work again.
__________________

Seiko RAF Gen 1 Chrono
Black Bay Red
Submariner 114060
Daytona 116520
BlackBay1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 06:51 PM   #109
zama
"TRF" Member
 
zama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Craig
Location: Sydney
Watch: 4 Broken glass
Posts: 5,808
Glad I sold my TT Daytona a month ago, I think the ceramic will certainly impact the old no matter how much we all loved it.
__________________
Day Date 118206, Daytona 116509 & 116505, AP 25859ST
Gone but not forgotten and genuinely missed.....
Root Beer GMT, Sub, TT Daytona, YG DD Bark, Datejust(2 his & hers), AP RO, PP Aquanaut, Lange 1, Heuer Monza, Piaget Altiplano, GP Chrono, Seamaster, Tudor Sub, Tudor Chrono, Tudor Black Bay Bronze
zama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 07:10 PM   #110
Singslinger
"TRF" Member
 
Singslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
Quote:
Originally Posted by Token74 View Post
Love them both. I've always wanted a Daytona but the scratched bezel always put me off actually buying one, so the Ceramic was a no-brainer the second it was announced. But that doesn't take anything away from the SS bezel model, it's a wonderful watch, just not for me.
Same here.
Singslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 10:02 PM   #111
paltak
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Bob
Location: IL
Posts: 825
I have the White 116520 and I plan to add the White 116500. Love them both!
paltak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 10:39 PM   #112
timackerman
"TRF" Member
 
timackerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Tim
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,117
I wonder if I will be able to get my hands on a new ceramic bezel and install it on my 116520?
__________________
Daytona 116520
timackerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 11:26 PM   #113
10Past10
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: James
Location: London
Watch: Patek 5712/1A
Posts: 151
The ceramic SS daytona definitely has a sportier look to it - personally i prefer the original Daytona as for me its more of an evening wear and classier - that said I've just put myself on the waiting list for the ceramic :)
10Past10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 11:33 PM   #114
Ckci
"TRF" Member
 
Ckci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Russell
Location: KC, MO
Watch: FedEx 4 next 1
Posts: 2,244
I think the SSC will go well with my 16520 Zenith Daytona which I got because I felt they would only become harder to find.
Name:  image.jpg
Views: 843
Size:  112.7 KB
I really prefer the subdials on the SSC also. The bezel is much more readable than the SS bezel. In re: to the SSC looking sportier or less classic. Dr. Tom maybe able to weigh in on this with more authority but as a lay person I am pretty sure Auto Racing qualifies as a Sport and therefore I'm pretty sure the Daytona is supposed to be first and foremost a Sport watch not first and foremost a dress watch. This is finally getting back to the Daytona's roots after having taken a "U-turn" and going down a different path for too many years.
Dr. Russell.
Ckci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 11:42 PM   #115
watch_the_time
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: U.S.
Posts: 79
The new black ceramic on the black face looks outstanding. More masculine and powerful in my opinion. At first the white face captivated me but now I think black is the winner. In the end, Rolex wins because demand will be huge yet the old version still has a following..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
watch_the_time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 11:58 PM   #116
Cinquecento
"TRF" Member
 
Cinquecento's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: At home
Posts: 523
I love the new white dial Daytona-C - i will keep my black dial and add the new white.
__________________
- 116718 GMT II Black Dial
- 116680 Yacht-Master II SS
- 16610 Submariner Y Serial
- 116520 Daytona Black Dial
Cinquecento is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2016, 12:06 AM   #117
droptopman
"TRF" Member
 
droptopman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Mark
Location: Washington State
Watch: SUBS and GMT's!
Posts: 9,664
Little torn. Like them both. I have planned on adding a chrono to my collection but have been more focused on a four digit reference. I need to see the 116500 in the flesh before I can decide. Guess I will be waiting awhile on this....
__________________
Judge Smails: Ty, what did you shoot today?
Ty: Oh, Judge, I don't keep score.
Judge Smails: Then how do you measure yourself with other golfers?
Ty: By height.
droptopman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2016, 12:24 AM   #118
Ckci
"TRF" Member
 
Ckci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Russell
Location: KC, MO
Watch: FedEx 4 next 1
Posts: 2,244
This is what a classic Daytona looks like.
Name:  image.jpg
Views: 814
Size:  105.9 KB
Pic is of HL65's (Ken's) INCREDIBLE 6263 which many of us LUST after! Posted with permission from Ken.
Ckci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2016, 12:26 AM   #119
Ckci
"TRF" Member
 
Ckci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Russell
Location: KC, MO
Watch: FedEx 4 next 1
Posts: 2,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by droptopman View Post
Little torn. Like them both. I have planned on adding a chrono to my collection but have been more focused on a four digit reference. I need to see the 116500 in the flesh before I can decide. Guess I will be waiting awhile on this....
I'd go with a great 4 digit if you can find it and swing it.
Ckci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2016, 12:28 AM   #120
tkerrmd
"TRF" Member
 
tkerrmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevan View Post
Quote....

"I am so sorry and realise the reaction this may incur.

Does anyone else think it has lost a little of it's classical look?

I'll have the Platona - stunning - different. But the steel is now looking like the Platona, all be it in the brown...

Open the gates of hell...."
I think it will be a nice watch addition to compliment the Platona, will show you when mine arrives!


tkerrmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.