ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Breadstickz · 2 June 2016, 05:46 AM

Hi everyone, so I'm looking into getting my first ap and am just enamoured by the 15400 blue or the jumbo and was hoping for some advice. The watch would be my new daily wearer and I was wondering which would you choose and why? Which would be sturdier and less prone to issues? Thanks in advance for any and all help! It's greatly appreciated!

thomaspp · 2 June 2016, 05:55 AM

Jumbo because it's awesome

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

PJ S · 2 June 2016, 05:59 AM

The perennial debate on this exact quandary is contained within these hallowed pages – you just have to bother looking and using the search function.

HL65 · 2 June 2016, 06:02 AM

Huge fan of the Jumbo and most comfortable watch I own. There is just something truly special about it so easy choice for me. I would suggest trying both on and you will know rather quickly. Best of luck with your decision.

Breadstickz · 2 June 2016, 06:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PJ S

The perennial debate on this exact quandary is contained within these hallowed pages – you just have to bother looking and using the search function.

Thanks I have looked up a few of the other threads as well, have been doing quite a bit of research as it'll be my first ap so I figured no harm in bringing it up. Better safe then sorry as they say!

anothernewphone · 2 June 2016, 06:20 AM

The Jumbo is a fantastic watch, but I like having a seconds hand. Fitment is another question, do you want 39mm or 41?

Breadstickz · 2 June 2016, 06:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HL65

Huge fan of the Jumbo and most comfortable watch I own. There is just something truly special about it so easy choice for me. I would suggest trying both on and you will know rather quickly. Best of luck with your decision.

Thanks for the advice! Will definitely be trying both on before purchase, unfortunately they don't have a boutique in Toronto so I can't see the 15400 blue in person, but will definitely be trying on a black or white.

Peterandwatches · 2 June 2016, 06:26 AM

I went with the 15400 as it's a bit more sporty for daily wear, has some modern touches, and also exists in a lower price point.

I also argue that the 15400 is the version most true to the original Royal Oak. The Royal Oak is intended to wear large (hence, Jumbo), and the 15400 keeps those dynamics alive at 41 mm. Both fantastic choices, and there are no wrong decisions!

RHIII · 2 June 2016, 06:26 AM

Jumbo - without question or hesitation....

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

AK797 · 2 June 2016, 06:57 AM

There's quite a bit of difference between the two - size, hands, date-set, ancestry, plus the shade of blue on the dials, so it comes down to which suits you most.

WristEnvy · 2 June 2016, 07:07 AM

For me personally, I find having the seconds hand a bit more practical. I'm interested in getting my first AP as well. I'll try on the 15400 when I have a chance, but i'm not in a rush, because i'll just end up buying now if it fits well. What others are saying is also consider a 15300, if you feel the 15400 is too big on your wrist.

ndrenfro · 2 June 2016, 07:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RHIII

Jumbo - without question or hesitation....

Agree

Cabaiguan · 2 June 2016, 10:46 AM

Jumbo. I've owned both in blue and the Jumbo has stayed.

alexlt730512 · 2 June 2016, 11:03 AM

15202

s14roller · 2 June 2016, 11:33 AM

I think the 15202 is nice due to the history and the movement is gorgeous. Realistically, I prefer the size and feel of the 15400. The 15202 felt a bit lighter and more fragile to me.

agsstructures · 2 June 2016, 11:47 AM

Had the 15202 and now have the black 15400. Appreciate the 15202 for the history but I prefer the 15400 more for an everyday piece.

Either way good luck!

NoVaSubowner · 2 June 2016, 11:59 AM

Having owned the 15400 I would honestly say that if I could do it over again I would probably go Jumbo.........

cervantes · 2 June 2016, 12:46 PM

Prefer the Jumbo.

7sins · 2 June 2016, 01:39 PM

Much prefer the seconds hand, went with the 15300 and couldn't be happier.

el1125 · 2 June 2016, 01:40 PM

Jumbo!

GB-man · 2 June 2016, 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peterandwatches

I went with the 15400 as it's a bit more sporty for daily wear, has some modern touches, and also exists in a lower price point.

I also argue that the 15400 is the version most true to the original Royal Oak. The Royal Oak is intended to wear large (hence, Jumbo), and the 15400 keeps those dynamics alive at 41 mm. Both fantastic choices, and there are no wrong decisions!

Surely you joke

Had a 15400 and its a great piece. Traded it after picking up a 5711 as it felt a bit cumbersome. If I went back I think I would go 15202 but I can't say for sure as I really do like the seconds hand. Only one thing is certain, I need another Royal oak

Daycruiser · 2 June 2016, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Breadstickz

Hi everyone, so I'm looking into getting my first ap and am just enamoured by the 15400 blue or the jumbo and was hoping for some advice. The watch would be my new daily wearer and I was wondering which would you choose and why? Which would be sturdier and less prone to issues? Thanks in advance for any and all help! It's greatly appreciated!

Well both are not easy to find.

The Jumbo is a classic, Gérald Genta at his very best (comparable to Nautlius IMHO) it's sleek, thin and sits very comfortably on ones wrist.

The 15400 is one of my Grail watches, I prefer a "bigger" watch because I am a big guy with a big wrist. I went with the 26320 because of that, and also because of the great discount I managed to get vis a vis a MSRP 15400 from the boutique shop.

Both are masterpieces, but you have to consider whether you want a 39mm or a 41mm, and the 41mm pretty much sits on your wrist like a 42mm, so if you prefer more classical styling go with the 15202, if you want a more contemporary take on a classic go with a 15400.

dr.ns23 · 2 June 2016, 05:53 PM

15202 for sure

RichHitch · 2 June 2016, 06:19 PM

I own and love the 15400... But I prefer the dimensions and dial layout of the 15202 !

benlee · 2 June 2016, 06:48 PM

No contest. Jumbo win hands down.

rebel_1 · 2 June 2016, 07:35 PM

My understanding is the blue dial 15400 is a botique only piece, so it's probably hard to come by. I own the Jumbo. I actually prefer the no second hand dial. The only two things I dislike about the Jumbo are #1 it's not a Nautilus & #2 it's a pain to manually wind. If I had it to do all over, I'd probably have gone with a PP 5711 instead.

lapince · 2 June 2016, 07:43 PM

saw both, the 15400 did nothing to me, the Jumbo did, it's proportions are so much better IMO than the other...

Breadstickz · 3 June 2016, 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by s14roller

I think the 15202 is nice due to the history and the movement is gorgeous. Realistically, I prefer the size and feel of the 15400. The 15202 felt a bit lighter and more fragile to me.

Does it just feel more fragile due to the thinner dimension? Is it actually more fragile or just feels it?

NoVaSubowner · 3 June 2016, 02:04 AM

Its anything but fragile. As robust as the 15400. Just thinner. I had the 15400, loved it. Did not love the proportions and I have a 7 3/4 wrist. Its 41mm but wears like 43mm.

I would go Jumbo next time for the sizing reason alone...

Chute · 3 June 2016, 01:18 PM

You have to try them on, quite different on the wrist between a thin 15202 39mm watch and a thicker 15400 at 41mm. For me, neither fit right so I'm on the hunt for a 15300 or 5711 if I can ever find one of either to try on.

2 June 2016, 06:02 AM	#4
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 64,004	Huge fan of the Jumbo and most comfortable watch I own. There is just something truly special about it so easy choice for me. I would suggest trying both on and you will know rather quickly. Best of luck with your decision. __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

2 June 2016, 10:46 AM	#13
Cabaiguan "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Raf Location: NJ Watch: GMTII Posts: 2,155	Jumbo. I've owned both in blue and the Jumbo has stayed. __________________ "A ship of war is the best ambassador." - Oliver Cromwell

2 June 2016, 01:39 PM	#19
7sins "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: B. Location: Beverly Hills, CA Posts: 3,621	Much prefer the seconds hand, went with the 15300 and couldn't be happier. __________________ Richard Mille RG RM030 \|\| Richard Mille RM72ti \|\| AP 26240 50TH Green Royal Oak Chrono \|\| AP Royal Oak Off Shore Gulf Blue 26238 \|\| AP Royal Oak Blue JUMBO SS 15202ST \|\| AP ROO Diver Green 15720ST \|\| ♕ Rolex Platinum Daytona Diamond 116506 \|\| Cartier Santos

2 June 2016, 06:48 PM	#25
benlee "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Ben Location: SIN & JKT Watch: Rolex, AP, PP Posts: 9,874	No contest. Jumbo win hands down. __________________ Follow me on Instagram : benlee789

2 June 2016, 07:35 PM	#26
rebel_1 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: Florida Posts: 2,132	My understanding is the blue dial 15400 is a botique only piece, so it's probably hard to come by. I own the Jumbo. I actually prefer the no second hand dial. The only two things I dislike about the Jumbo are #1 it's not a Nautilus & #2 it's a pain to manually wind. If I had it to do all over, I'd probably have gone with a PP 5711 instead. __________________ Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017

2 June 2016, 05:46 AM	#1
Breadstickz "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2015 Location: Toronto Watch: 114060 Posts: 50	15400 blue vs 15202? Hi everyone, so I'm looking into getting my first ap and am just enamoured by the 15400 blue or the jumbo and was hoping for some advice. The watch would be my new daily wearer and I was wondering which would you choose and why? Which would be sturdier and less prone to issues? Thanks in advance for any and all help! It's greatly appreciated!

2 June 2016, 05:55 AM	#2
thomaspp "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: N/A Posts: 11,137	15400 blue vs 15202? Jumbo because it's awesome Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Instagram: @watches_anonymous

2 June 2016, 05:59 AM	#3
PJ S Banned Join Date: Mar 2014 Location: UK Posts: 3,990	The perennial debate on this exact quandary is contained within these hallowed pages – you just have to bother looking and using the search function.

2 June 2016, 06:20 AM	#6
anothernewphone Banned Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Bill Location: Plymouth Meeting Watch: 116520 Posts: 3,209	The Jumbo is a fantastic watch, but I like having a seconds hand. Fitment is another question, do you want 39mm or 41?

2 June 2016, 06:26 AM	#8
Peterandwatches "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: WA Watch: 5167/15400/Sub/JLC Posts: 1,023	I went with the 15400 as it's a bit more sporty for daily wear, has some modern touches, and also exists in a lower price point. I also argue that the 15400 is the version most true to the original Royal Oak. The Royal Oak is intended to wear large (hence, Jumbo), and the 15400 keeps those dynamics alive at 41 mm. Both fantastic choices, and there are no wrong decisions!

2 June 2016, 06:26 AM	#9
RHIII Member Join Date: Jul 2014 Real Name: Roger Location: ... Watch: AP/Rolex/PP Posts: 6,309	Jumbo - without question or hesitation.... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

2 June 2016, 06:57 AM	#10
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,369	There's quite a bit of difference between the two - size, hands, date-set, ancestry, plus the shade of blue on the dials, so it comes down to which suits you most.

2 June 2016, 07:07 AM	#11
WristEnvy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Real Name: Ray Location: Berkeley, CA Watch: IG @watch.kakashi Posts: 2,579	For me personally, I find having the seconds hand a bit more practical. I'm interested in getting my first AP as well. I'll try on the 15400 when I have a chance, but i'm not in a rush, because i'll just end up buying now if it fits well. What others are saying is also consider a 15300, if you feel the 15400 is too big on your wrist.

2 June 2016, 11:03 AM	#14
alexlt730512 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 1,248	15202

2 June 2016, 11:33 AM	#15
s14roller "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: US Posts: 3,257	I think the 15202 is nice due to the history and the movement is gorgeous. Realistically, I prefer the size and feel of the 15400. The 15202 felt a bit lighter and more fragile to me.

2 June 2016, 11:47 AM	#16
agsstructures 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Brooklyn, NY Posts: 2,401	Had the 15202 and now have the black 15400. Appreciate the 15202 for the history but I prefer the 15400 more for an everyday piece. Either way good luck!

2 June 2016, 11:59 AM	#17
NoVaSubowner "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Alexandria, VA Watch: Love them. Posts: 1,095	Having owned the 15400 I would honestly say that if I could do it over again I would probably go Jumbo.........

2 June 2016, 12:46 PM	#18
cervantes "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2014 Real Name: Jay Location: East and West Posts: 1,894	Prefer the Jumbo.

2 June 2016, 01:40 PM	#20
el1125 Banned Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: USA Posts: 3,578	Jumbo!

2 June 2016, 05:53 PM	#23
dr.ns23 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Somewhere Watch: 15202 Posts: 436	15202 for sure

2 June 2016, 06:19 PM	#24
RichHitch "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Barth Location: London Watch: Rolex Patek AP Posts: 108	I own and love the 15400... But I prefer the dimensions and dial layout of the 15202 !

2 June 2016, 07:43 PM	#27
lapince "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Mars Watch: 5712 Posts: 11,509	saw both, the 15400 did nothing to me, the Jumbo did, it's proportions are so much better IMO than the other...

3 June 2016, 02:04 AM	#29
NoVaSubowner "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Alexandria, VA Watch: Love them. Posts: 1,095	Its anything but fragile. As robust as the 15400. Just thinner. I had the 15400, loved it. Did not love the proportions and I have a 7 3/4 wrist. Its 41mm but wears like 43mm. I would go Jumbo next time for the sizing reason alone...

3 June 2016, 01:18 PM	#30
Chute "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Real Name: Chris Location: Austin Watch: 6 digit Rolex+APRO Posts: 1,560	You have to try them on, quite different on the wrist between a thin 15202 39mm watch and a thicker 15400 at 41mm. For me, neither fit right so I'm on the hunt for a 15300 or 5711 if I can ever find one of either to try on.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)