The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Classifieds > WatchOut!!!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 July 2016, 07:26 PM   #1
Ac2100
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Denmark
Posts: 21
Authenticate this Rolex datejust cal.3035, Ref. 16013, year 2001

.
Its me again..

So, I found this datejust I like as well, and I need your help again to authenticate this.

Rolex datejust cal.3035, Ref. 16013, year 2001.

IF this is authentic, which whats is the best deal? the 16013 or 16233 from 1991 (I have added a picture last in this thread)
It is my first Rolex watch, and I am a newbie in this field so I really appreciate your help.

The 16013 has the box with.
Attached Images
         
Ac2100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2016, 07:36 PM   #2
Ac2100
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Denmark
Posts: 21
The first pic is 16013, the last 16233.
Attached Images
   
Ac2100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2016, 09:21 PM   #3
GLADIATOR
"TRF" Member
 
GLADIATOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Costa Blanca,
Watch: YMII,GMTII,DAYTONA
Posts: 5,288
Movement genuine.
I would like others comments on the bracelet, that has some concerns if all original and/or correct end links and clasp
A
GLADIATOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2016, 09:25 PM   #4
crowncollection
"TRF" Member
 
crowncollection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ac2100 View Post
.

Its me again..



So, I found this datejust I like as well, and I need your help again to authenticate this.



Rolex datejust cal.3035, Ref. 16013, year 2001.



IF this is authentic, which whats is the best deal? the 16013 or 16233 from 1991 (I have added a picture last in this thread)

It is my first Rolex watch, and I am a newbie in this field so I really appreciate your help.



The 16013 has the box with.


16013 ceased production 1987


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many
crowncollection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 July 2016, 02:44 AM   #5
Ac2100
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Denmark
Posts: 21
Thank you for your reply.

The seller just wrote me that the watch is from 1988, and not 2001- would that change anything or is there to many red flags?
Ac2100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 July 2016, 05:05 AM   #6
dera
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,372
Yes definitely not 2001. Looks good, box not original to the watch (and impossible to say if it is real based on those pics).
dera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 July 2016, 06:53 AM   #7
jvmartin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,349
original 16013... just make sure that's what actually arrives.
jvmartin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 July 2016, 03:20 PM   #8
freefly
"TRF" Member
 
freefly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Eric
Location: AZ
Watch: 4&5-digit Sub/GMTs
Posts: 1,974
The hands on the 16013 look a bit off.
Near the center stack you can see what looks like either Like oil smudges or possibly generic plated hands where the plating has come off.
freefly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 July 2016, 08:28 PM   #9
Ac2100
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Denmark
Posts: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ac2100 View Post
.
Its me again..

So, I found this datejust I like as well, and I need your help again to authenticate this.

Rolex datejust cal.3035, Ref. 16013, year 2001.

IF this is authentic, which whats is the best deal? the 16013 or 16233 from 1991 (I have added a picture last in this thread)
It is my first Rolex watch, and I am a newbie in this field so I really appreciate your help.

The 16013 has the box with.
Okay, so you would say that this is an authentic Rolex 16013 Dera & Jvmartin?
But freefly, you would say it is a fake?
Ac2100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 July 2016, 09:27 PM   #10
freefly
"TRF" Member
 
freefly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Eric
Location: AZ
Watch: 4&5-digit Sub/GMTs
Posts: 1,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ac2100 View Post
Okay, so you would say that this is an authentic Rolex 16013 Dera & Jvmartin?
But freefly, you would say it is a fake?
Not "fake", just that there is an issue with the hands on the white-dial 16013. Could be generic plated hands.
Also, the bezel appears to be aftermarket. Not 100% on the dial either (would need to see a straight-on high-res pic).
freefly is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.