ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 July 2016, 07:26 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Denmark
Posts: 21
|
Authenticate this Rolex datejust cal.3035, Ref. 16013, year 2001
.
Its me again.. So, I found this datejust I like as well, and I need your help again to authenticate this. Rolex datejust cal.3035, Ref. 16013, year 2001. IF this is authentic, which whats is the best deal? the 16013 or 16233 from 1991 (I have added a picture last in this thread) It is my first Rolex watch, and I am a newbie in this field so I really appreciate your help. The 16013 has the box with. |
25 July 2016, 07:36 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Denmark
Posts: 21
|
The first pic is 16013, the last 16233.
|
25 July 2016, 09:21 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Costa Blanca,
Watch: YMII,GMTII,DAYTONA
Posts: 5,288
|
Movement genuine.
I would like others comments on the bracelet, that has some concerns if all original and/or correct end links and clasp A |
25 July 2016, 09:25 PM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
Quote:
16013 ceased production 1987 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many |
|
26 July 2016, 02:44 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Denmark
Posts: 21
|
Thank you for your reply.
The seller just wrote me that the watch is from 1988, and not 2001- would that change anything or is there to many red flags? |
26 July 2016, 05:05 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,372
|
Yes definitely not 2001. Looks good, box not original to the watch (and impossible to say if it is real based on those pics).
|
26 July 2016, 06:53 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,349
|
original 16013... just make sure that's what actually arrives.
|
26 July 2016, 03:20 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Eric
Location: AZ
Watch: 4&5-digit Sub/GMTs
Posts: 1,974
|
The hands on the 16013 look a bit off.
Near the center stack you can see what looks like either Like oil smudges or possibly generic plated hands where the plating has come off. |
26 July 2016, 08:28 PM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Denmark
Posts: 21
|
Quote:
But freefly, you would say it is a fake? |
|
26 July 2016, 09:27 PM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Eric
Location: AZ
Watch: 4&5-digit Sub/GMTs
Posts: 1,974
|
Quote:
Also, the bezel appears to be aftermarket. Not 100% on the dial either (would need to see a straight-on high-res pic). |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.