The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Classifieds > WatchOut!!!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11 August 2016, 07:39 PM   #1
HectorM
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: London
Posts: 31
GMT 16750 help

Hi all,

Looking to buy a vintage GMT. This has caught my eye:

http://www.watchfinder.co.uk/Rolex/G...269/item/71102

What are people's thoughts? As a hunch, the dial seems to be the appropriate MK.1 but looks a tad suspect to me (almost TOO mint). Possible relume?

Any help much appreciated.
HectorM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2016, 09:08 PM   #2
freefly
"TRF" Member
 
freefly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Eric
Location: AZ
Watch: 4&5-digit Sub/GMTs
Posts: 1,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by HectorM View Post
Hi all,

Looking to buy a vintage GMT. This has caught my eye:

http://www.watchfinder.co.uk/Rolex/G...269/item/71102

What are people's thoughts? As a hunch, the dial seems to be the appropriate MK.1 but looks a tad suspect to me (almost TOO mint). Possible relume?

Any help much appreciated.
Looks like it's been in for a service and everything was replaced. Also, the lugs look very thin (especially the 5 o'clock side).

For me personally, service parts + thin/over-polished case = deal breaker. YMMV.
freefly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2016, 09:09 PM   #3
GLADIATOR
"TRF" Member
 
GLADIATOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Costa Blanca,
Watch: YMII,GMTII,DAYTONA
Posts: 5,288
Watch looks nice, but it "seems" to have the sandwiched GMT hand as correct for GMTII.

I really wonder if that is truly a photo of the actual watch.

I recently contacted this company to buy a Daytona. They change Rolex crystals out with NON service parts (no LEC)

A
__________________
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. Winston Churchill
"We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done."
GLADIATOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2016, 09:27 PM   #4
HectorM
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: London
Posts: 31
Thanks, both. I'll pass on it.

As a further point of interest, I gave the company in question a ring this morning and they won't guarantee originality or authenticity. In fact, they seem highly reticent to even discuss it.

Caveat emptor, I suppose...
HectorM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 August 2016, 08:22 AM   #5
freefly
"TRF" Member
 
freefly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Eric
Location: AZ
Watch: 4&5-digit Sub/GMTs
Posts: 1,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by GLADIATOR View Post
Watch looks nice, but it "seems" to have the sandwiched GMT hand as correct for GMTII.

I really wonder if that is truly a photo of the actual watch.
Hand stack is correct. The 16750 was a "transitional" reference.
freefly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 August 2016, 03:58 PM   #6
GLADIATOR
"TRF" Member
 
GLADIATOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Costa Blanca,
Watch: YMII,GMTII,DAYTONA
Posts: 5,288
Quote:
Originally Posted by freefly View Post
Hand stack is correct. The 16750 was a "transitional" reference.
Thanks.
I presume this will then pass the crown clockwise test?
__________________
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. Winston Churchill
"We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done."
GLADIATOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2016, 11:25 AM   #7
freefly
"TRF" Member
 
freefly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Eric
Location: AZ
Watch: 4&5-digit Sub/GMTs
Posts: 1,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by GLADIATOR View Post
Thanks.
I presume this will then pass the crown clockwise test?
No, still CCW hands when turning crown CW, just like the 1675.
However, the new movement (3075) was fast-beat w/ quick-set date.
freefly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2016, 12:38 PM   #8
Knappo 1307
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Knappo 1307's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 8,561
Quote:
Originally Posted by freefly View Post
No, still CCW hands when turning crown CW, just like the 1675.
However, the new movement (3075) was fast-beat w/ quick-set date.
Nice info, Eric...
Knappo 1307 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2016, 12:45 PM   #9
GLADIATOR
"TRF" Member
 
GLADIATOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Costa Blanca,
Watch: YMII,GMTII,DAYTONA
Posts: 5,288
Quote:
Originally Posted by freefly View Post
No, still CCW hands when turning crown CW, just like the 1675.
However, the new movement (3075) was fast-beat w/ quick-set date.
Many thanks your excellent knowledge. Appreciated
Adam
__________________
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. Winston Churchill
"We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done."
GLADIATOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2016, 11:25 PM   #10
HectorM
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: London
Posts: 31
Thanks all for your help on this. Unreal expertise!
HectorM is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
gmt , vintage , vintage gmt , vintage rolex


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.