ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 August 2016, 03:17 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2013
Location: uk
Posts: 487
|
5 & 6 digit brothers
I've just allowed myself the experience of having both the 114060 and the 14060m. Who else has the 5 & 6 digit version of their favourite reference?
I've read a lot of reports on which is better and why... but never truly appreciated the differences for myself Both watches practically represent my initial attractions to the brand. The submariner 14060 was the watch I drooled after and tried on for size numerous times even though I had no money to own one.... but that Did not dissuade me. Eventually I got into a position where a purchase was looming. Amidst the relentless price increases in the uk at the time I managed to get on to the "rolex ladder". But, that first watch was a 116610ln. Simply the newest submariner to the market - with all the so called improvements... ultimately I'd have preferred the 114060 but it hadn't been invented at that time. Soon enough the 114060 hit the market tho and so I did make the change. Recently however I've rediscovered my rolex roots and acquired the initial object of my desire the 14060m I can certainly see the difference between them. But I also really appreciate those differences. It's taken a while to see through the fog of "what's the best" in order to allow an appreciation for the previous generation. I'm not going to list all the differences that we all know about, just wanted to share the experience with you like minded folk My only concern now.... is where will the appreciation for the previous generations take me |
25 August 2016, 04:08 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Bill
Location: Baltimore, MD
Watch: 116600 SD4K
Posts: 3,284
|
I love both my SD 16600 and SD4K 116600. Great watches.
|
25 August 2016, 04:51 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NC
Watch: RG Olive DD40
Posts: 1,795
|
I've had both LVs although not at the same time. A family member still has the five digit version so I've compared the two together. I prefer the six digit types due to the bezel and clasp.
At any rate, great post and picture. |
25 August 2016, 04:53 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Rollee
Location: Boston
Watch: it watching me
Posts: 1,945
|
5 digits any day, more sexy on me
__________________
Time you enjoy wasting was not wasted |
25 August 2016, 05:38 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Steve
Location: Shasta
Watch: es..More Watches!
Posts: 2,415
|
i have a 16710 and a 116710LN. Both great to have and get plenty of wrist time
|
25 August 2016, 06:19 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: OT
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: Daytona 116500LN
Posts: 489
|
It's a very slippery slope. I have a 114060 and a 16710, and my love for the latter which is vintage is having me considering the 14060 now...
__________________
______________________________ OT |
25 August 2016, 06:34 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: Chris
Location: New York
Watch: 16710,116300
Posts: 501
|
I think it's cool that you focused your collection to the references that you personally appreciate.
|
25 August 2016, 06:52 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Justin
Location: FL
Watch: PO/EXPL
Posts: 3,371
|
Great choices, I have had the 116600 and recently traded it for a 16600. Both watches are amazing and there isn't anything I could say bad about the 116600 but for me it doesn't get much better then the 16600. The five digits just have the last of the Rolex spirit to me.
|
25 August 2016, 07:34 AM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: 35000ft
Posts: 3,771
|
6 digits for me.
|
25 August 2016, 12:08 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Will
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Watch: SubC, Pam, Speede
Posts: 3,146
|
Modern to me.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.