The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion
Reload this Page 1953 Sub -- present day. You would choose?
Register FAQ Calendar

Reply
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29 November 2016, 10:51 AM   #1
WEST HAM ROLEX
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London/Asia
Watch: GMT LN/SD43/D Blue
Posts: 872
1953 Sub -- present day. You would choose?
Found this image of a 1953 Sub (no date) and the latest model the 114060

Putting the value aside, which would you like to wear??

I know a lot of you guys on this Forum probably own both, but it will be interesting to see which one would get more wear on a daily basis...?

My choice - I think I would enjoy wearing the old one....

Name: image.jpg Views: 777 Size: 70.4 KB
WEST HAM ROLEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 10:57 AM   #2
Meme-Dweller
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: TX
Watch: Meme-Dweller
Posts: 498
For wearing, the new one. For collecting, the old one.

Most of the concern is water resistance, which can by chance happen to fail even if the seals are checked regularly. Stuff happens, you know? If water gets in the case on the new one, send it to RSC, pay a little if not covered by warranty, and you're good. If the water got into the old one, it's pretty much never going to be the same and will need a service dial.
Meme-Dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 11:01 AM   #3
Watchgeek5000
"TRF" Member
 
Watchgeek5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brooklyn USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 1,622
Love no crown guards, acrylic crystal and riveted bracelet! So 1953 would be my choice!
Watchgeek5000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 11:19 AM   #4
Dr.Smellody
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 5,417
6205....
Dr.Smellody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 11:42 AM   #5
douglasf13
"TRF" Member
 
douglasf13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
I would like to wear any Sub ever made, except the 114060/116610, so it's a pretty easy decision for me.
douglasf13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 11:43 AM   #6
Afghanvet
"TRF" Member
 
Afghanvet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Virginia
Watch: Subs, SD4K
Posts: 2,272
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meme-Dweller View Post
For wearing, the new one. For collecting, the old one.

Most of the concern is water resistance, which can by chance happen even if the seals are checked regularly. Stuff happens, you know? If water gets in the case on the new one, send it to RSC, pay a little if not covered by warranty, and you're good. If the water got into the old one, it's pretty much never going to be the same and will need a service dial.
Me, too...
__________________
Subaholics Anonymous
Afghanvet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 12:06 PM   #7
Dusko.Popov
"TRF" Member
 
Dusko.Popov's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: DC
Posts: 829
114060 without a doubt. The lack of a crown guard makes the facade look incomplete and sorta dainty. Just not very attractive.
Dusko.Popov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 12:08 PM   #8
Goin2drt
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,307
Since you said value aside, easy, modern one.
Goin2drt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 12:29 PM   #9
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by douglasf13 View Post
I would like to wear any Sub ever made, except the 114060/116610, so it's a pretty easy decision for me.
x2.
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 12:33 PM   #10
Timesurfer
"TRF" Member
 
Timesurfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: 12,000+ Lakes!
Watch: 16710 Daytona BLNR
Posts: 840
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meme-Dweller View Post
For wearing, the new one. For collecting, the old one.
Pretty much sum's it up for me....
Timesurfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 12:35 PM   #11
cop414
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
cop414's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,258
Old school.
__________________

Rolex Submariner 14060M
Omega Seamaster 2254.50
DOXA Professional 1200T

Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron
P Club Member #17
2 FA ENABLED
cop414 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 12:40 PM   #12
Lordofrolex
"TRF" Member
 
Lordofrolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: Yes Please!
Posts: 6,691
Modern but as a collector, old.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN
Panerai PAM 359
Audemars Piguet RO 15300OR

Follow me on Instagram: @b_jakobovich
Lordofrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 12:41 PM   #13
insomniac2
"TRF" Member
 
insomniac2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Adam
Location: Chicago
Posts: 135
i'd love to own the oldie but definitely wear the 114060, such a substantial watch.
__________________
|Rolex 14060m|Superocean Héritage I Navitimer 43|
insomniac2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 12:42 PM   #14
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
The watch on the left is probably worth about $500,000.

I don't think I could wear that, much less pay for it.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 12:48 PM   #15
AzHadEnuf
"TRF" Member
 
AzHadEnuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Ralph
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Watch: 6263,DJ,SUB,BB,THR
Posts: 2,043
Hummmm..........the one on the left.
__________________
"The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." -A. Einstein
AzHadEnuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 12:51 PM   #16
flv112
"TRF" Member
 
flv112's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: flv
Location: asia
Posts: 241
Value aside? Of course the newest ones (for me)
flv112 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 12:58 PM   #17
jonathan17
"TRF" Member
 
jonathan17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: jon
Location: Singapore
Watch: ??? Yes please!
Posts: 622
i wish a mash up of 1953-dial & hands with the 114060 case that would be awesome.
jonathan17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 12:59 PM   #18
Aceldama
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Central Cal
Watch: Dads Omega Cal 601
Posts: 707
Vintage. The newest sub is just to boxy for my tastes...
Aceldama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 01:06 PM   #19
Allanmodel
"TRF" Member
 
Allanmodel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Allan
Location: Little Red Dot
Watch: Still Looking....!
Posts: 3,899
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meme-Dweller View Post
For wearing, the new one. For collecting, the old one.
X2~~
Allanmodel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 01:09 PM   #20
southcarolina1801
"TRF" Member
 
southcarolina1801's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Peach State
Posts: 735
Definitely the 114060 as a daily wearer
southcarolina1801 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 01:47 PM   #21
nick c
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
Quote:
Originally Posted by dr.smellody View Post
6205....
x2
nick c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 02:00 PM   #22
weeone
"TRF" Member
 
weeone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: NJ/PA
Watch: Omega PO 37.5
Posts: 278
Modern. Love the maxi dial (that's what the larger markers are called?). Not a huge fan of vintage. Just my taste of course.
weeone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 02:48 PM   #23
WEST HAM ROLEX
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London/Asia
Watch: GMT LN/SD43/D Blue
Posts: 872
Quote:
Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott View Post
The watch on the left is probably worth about $500,000.

I don't think I could wear that, much less pay for it.
Interesting opinions from all of you...thanks

$500 000. Really ?
WEST HAM ROLEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 02:53 PM   #24
htbilgic
"TRF" Member
 
htbilgic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Chicago
Watch: Doxa Pro 300 NoT
Posts: 535
6205.
htbilgic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 03:03 PM   #25
VIG
"TRF" Member
 
VIG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: USA
Watch: this!
Posts: 409
I'm not gentle enough for old things.
__________________
Follow me on Instagram: @workshardplayshard
VIG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 03:22 PM   #26
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by WEST HAM ROLEX View Post
Interesting opinions from all of you...thanks

$500 000. Really ?
I did some research and that figure was mentioned.

Probably, the ones in circulation are not worth that much, but this one with the small crown is supposed to be rather rare and the one in the picture looks mint.

Whatever its true cost, it's out of my league and I wouldn't wear it, if somehow I came into possession of one, and I'm a guy who wears his watches.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 11:13 PM   #27
WEST HAM ROLEX
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London/Asia
Watch: GMT LN/SD43/D Blue
Posts: 872
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dusko.Popov View Post
114060 without a doubt. The lack of a crown guard makes the facade look incomplete and sorta dainty. Just not very attractive.
Yes agree, it's the crown guard that makes the watch look so different
WEST HAM ROLEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 11:40 PM   #28
SearChart
TechXpert
 
SearChart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,639
Vintage for sure!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
Rolex uses rare elves to polish the platinum. They have a union deal and make like $90 per hour and get time and half on weekends.
SearChart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 11:42 PM   #29
dysondiver
"TRF" Member
 
dysondiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
put a saphire crystal in the old one , and ill wear one every day.
dysondiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2016, 11:48 PM   #30
OmegaJJH
"TRF" Member
 
OmegaJJH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: Rolex & Omega
Posts: 6,668
For an everyday watch, modern every time.

As part of a collection to be worn on special occasions etc, vintage.
OmegaJJH is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
 This space is provided to horological resources.



Contact Us - The Rolex Forums - Archive - Top


Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.