ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 November 2016, 01:55 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Alberta
Posts: 62
|
Would you own both if you could?
I'm curious if you folks here would own both a DSSD and Sub C in black that is?
What do you think? |
29 November 2016, 01:55 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 3,392
|
Too similar for me.
|
29 November 2016, 01:56 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: CA
Watch: Bluesy
Posts: 382
|
I wouldnt
|
29 November 2016, 01:59 PM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: shannon
Location: usa
Posts: 9,211
|
Not for me.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
29 November 2016, 02:00 PM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
|
They're both dive watches, but they are very different watches, so from a collectors point of view, I can see owning the Sub, Sub Date, SD4000, and the DSSD.
Would I? Not on my budget and since I'm not a collector in the truest sense, I can live that. Do you appreciate the differences enough to drop that kind of cash on both?
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
29 November 2016, 02:00 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: Trace
Location: Vegas/Bay Area
Posts: 9,234
|
Only YOU can make that call
__________________
Official Host "The Penthouse Party" Las Vegas 2018 Instagram @tracenunes |
29 November 2016, 02:03 PM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Alberta
Posts: 62
|
Quote:
|
|
29 November 2016, 02:10 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
|
|
29 November 2016, 02:17 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Willie
Location: Parkland,Fl.
Posts: 4,829
|
I do, and also the SD4k
|
29 November 2016, 02:17 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: Ray
Location: Berkeley, CA
Watch: IG @watch.kakashi
Posts: 2,579
|
I had a dssd the same time as a 16610lv. I flipped the dssd for a 116613lb bluesy. Go figure!
ig - @watch.kakashi |
29 November 2016, 02:20 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Alberta
Posts: 62
|
|
29 November 2016, 02:55 PM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London/Asia
Watch: GMT LN/SD43/D Blue
Posts: 872
|
Quote:
The Deepsea. I play golf everyday so would have to keep taking it off as its too heavy for my arm rotation through impact... But, my GMT. Can leave that on always...on and off the course So apart from that...would like to have both |
|
29 November 2016, 03:10 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London/Asia
Watch: GMT LN/SD43/D Blue
Posts: 872
|
|
29 November 2016, 03:12 PM | #14 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
|
Yes, but that's only the beginning.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
29 November 2016, 03:16 PM | #15 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
|
No; both are too large for my wrist. I'm happy with my little 14060.
|
29 November 2016, 03:16 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 121
|
No.
My Sub C date does everything the DSSD does (that I care about) in a reasonably sized package. I have no use for the DSSD and if somebody gave me one I would sell it to buy something else. |
29 November 2016, 03:58 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Wales
Watch: 126603
Posts: 2,606
|
I would own both without a doubt. I currently have a 114060 and at sometime in the future will have a DSSD DBlue
|
29 November 2016, 04:08 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Eric
Location: California
Watch: 114060
Posts: 425
|
I wouldn't. Far too similar no matter what someone tries to say.
|
29 November 2016, 04:33 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Mitch
Location: CONUS
Watch: DSSD and others
Posts: 1,186
|
Why yes...yes I do.
No issues with owning both. I own for me not anyone else. Each piece I own brings me its own unique feeling when I wear it. Here are some of my 6 digit divers. Cheers!
__________________
Sua Sponte! |
29 November 2016, 04:38 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
|
I sure would if I wanted to. For us it's all about the myriad subtle differences that others would think are minuscule. I have a 14060 and a 116600. To me they are completely different watches, but my wife can't tell them apart.
|
29 November 2016, 04:49 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Carlos
Location: Eivissa
Watch: Rolex, Tudor....
Posts: 1,635
|
DSSD too big for my wrist. SD4k is very nice but not fan of 6 digit divers, I feel like wearing a brick on my small wrist. I own 16600, 16610, 16610LV and 5513.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana". Groucho Marx. |
29 November 2016, 05:06 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Me
Location: Australia
Watch: Daytona 116500LN
Posts: 677
|
Not me. It'd be almost like buying two identical suits.
|
29 November 2016, 05:17 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Earth
Watch: RolexPatek
Posts: 664
|
Too similar
|
29 November 2016, 05:24 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Doug
Location: Georgia USA
Watch: Rolex President
Posts: 1,348
|
Too much alike. I backed off (so far) from buying a SubC because it's too much like my BLNR GMT. But, if you have the money for both, buy them, and live with them for awhile.
|
29 November 2016, 06:49 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: LD
Location: USA
Watch: 114060
Posts: 381
|
Nope. Just the Sub C for me.
|
29 November 2016, 07:24 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 53
|
No. will get a 116619.
|
29 November 2016, 07:26 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Barrowford
Watch: Tudor Black Bay 54
Posts: 1,699
|
I recently had both but found they did a very similar job. DSSD now sold and AP Diver has replaced it. Nice to have a bit of variety!
__________________
Rolex Explorer 214270, Omega Speedmaster '1957 Relaunch' 3594.50.00, Panerai Luminor 1950 PAM00127-E, Panerai Radiomir 1936 PAM00249-I, Panerai Mare Nostrum PAM00716-T, Panerai PAM00785-Q Set, Panerai Luminor Black Seal PAM00594-Q, Panerai Luminor Daylight PAM00604-Q, Tudor Black Bay 54 79000N, Heuer Carrera Re-Edition CS3113, Hamilton Military W10 & TAG Heuer F1
|
29 November 2016, 07:40 PM | #28 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,850
|
I'm guessing that the people with big collections would and those with small collections wouldn't, UNLESS they are folks who are mainly interested in 'sports watches'.
I'd need more than a dozen Rolex before I would want to have two that were very similar in appearance.
__________________
Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch. Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..." |
29 November 2016, 08:30 PM | #29 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,307
|
D-blue and 114060? sure!
|
29 November 2016, 09:45 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Watch Dealer atm!
Watch: all
Posts: 2,800
|
__________________
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.