ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 December 2016, 07:26 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Lincoln Park, NJ
Posts: 1
|
5513 Maxi MK3 Authenticity
Was hoping i could get some help here in regards to the 5513 purchased. Someone mention to me that the lume looked funky and that this period does not have domed lume. Any thoughts?
Rolex Submariner Serial-6,01X,XXX Mark III Maxi dial There are some drag marks around the 12, 3, 6 & 9. See macro lens images taken. |
2 December 2016, 09:09 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: usa
Posts: 542
|
disclamer: please take what I tell you as an opinion, there are monsters of knowledge floating around these parts !
looks like you have a Mark III maxi dial variant ( which is desirable), however yes the lume should not be puffy like that, most likely has been re applied, and there are also marks of 'cleaning up 'reshaping' on the surface of the dial, around said markers. not ideal :( the case is over polished as well, which is a negative by today's standards of 'lust'. a cool 5513 nonetheless. |
2 December 2016, 09:10 AM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
I believe you were given some correct advice.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
2 December 2016, 02:06 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: Mike
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: TT DJ 16233
Posts: 1,002
|
Bad relume job, case looks like it's been polished a little too much, lugs look on the thin side. Just my 0.02
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.