ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 May 2017, 07:17 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 164
|
Any wide shot of 42mm Explorer II?
I've been a long time reader and have always appreciated Rolex, but haven't wanted to add one to my collection until recently. I'm pretty set on either a new 42mm Explorer II or nothing. The only other Rolex I'd consider would be a sub, but I already have a SMPc which I love and don't really want another dive watch in the collection. Also, I like that the Explorer II is pretty unique while I see the black subs out and about frequently.
My only concern is that it's a bit too big. I've paid my AD a visit, and I'm kind of on the fence. At times I think it's fine, at other times I think it's just too large. I've got a fairly thin wrist at 6.75 inches, but it's flat so I can usually pull off 40-42mm watches no problem. The Explorer II has fairly wide lugs though, so it makes the watch wear much larger than other watches that are similarly sized. Most of the pictures I've come across on the forums have been up close which as I'm sure everyone knows makes the watch look much bigger. Does anyone have any wider shots of the Explorer II taken from further away? Every little bit helps as I decide if I'm going to make the plunge - thanks! |
29 May 2017, 07:36 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: RI
Watch: blusylvx2blnrsmpbb
Posts: 723
|
I love mine and it is more comfortable on then my 2 subs and BLNR and I have a 6.75 wrist as well
|
29 May 2017, 07:55 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,443
|
|
29 May 2017, 07:57 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
|
I have owned so many watches over the years and my black dialed Explorer II is probably my favorite of them all. It is such a great watch that does not scream Rolex like many others do.
As far as size, it will fit your wrist perfectly. I don't have any shots of it from a distance, but your wrist size will work well with it. People always worry because Rolex states it is 42mm. Funny thing is that next time you go to your AD, lay a sub c on top of it and you will see that they are pretty much exactly the same size. If Rolex put it at 40 or 41mm nobody would think twice. The Explorer II wears amazing. I hate gloss dials and the matte dial is stunning. The smaller clasp is more comfortable than my ceramic subs was. Honestly, it is my favorite Rolex on the market. The last of the true tool watches.
__________________
My grails: |
29 May 2017, 08:02 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 164
|
Thanks for the replies. That's really good to know. I've tried a sub on a few times before, and have absolutely no problem with that size. i really love the look of the Exp II. I'll definitely compare that to the sub next time I stop by my AD.
|
29 May 2017, 08:08 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NYC / Milan
Watch: 6263
Posts: 3,938
|
|
29 May 2017, 10:39 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: WA
Posts: 28
|
I absolutely love mine. I think the best overall value in the collection.
|
29 May 2017, 10:49 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Orange County CA
Posts: 16
|
Ugh....here I was contemplating on a polar. Above photo is making me think otherwise. I too have 6.5 inch wrist. I have a 43mm Tag that wears well, but the lugs on the Exp ii are way too long for me I think.
|
29 May 2017, 12:00 PM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: WA
Posts: 28
|
I think the polar wears smaller than my Tag Formula 1 which is a 43mm
|
29 May 2017, 12:03 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,044
|
I think you'll be fine, it's a great watch that wears very comfortably for it's size, IMO.
P.S. Those are great photos above, guys! P.P.S. Check out the EXP...at 39mm it's a great watch for us smaller waisted guys. |
29 May 2017, 12:06 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 164
|
Agreed - great pictures. Cycleman, love the explorer ii with the bow tie. Also with you on how it doesn't scream rolex. Very underrated beautiful piece.
|
29 May 2017, 12:08 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Orange County CA
Posts: 16
|
|
29 May 2017, 12:20 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 164
|
Not sure about the case height. Any problems fitting under a cuff? I want a versatile watch that I can wear with shorts and a tshirt (my uniform of choice) as well as a suit (not my uniform of choice which I have to wear far too often)
|
29 May 2017, 12:30 PM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: WA
Posts: 28
|
The reason I choose the Explorer II was for its versatility with dress code. I can wear it with my swim trunks and t shirt and not look like a tool trying to flash a Rolex or pair it with a bow tie for the Derby. There isn't an outfit that it doesn't with with.
|
29 May 2017, 12:31 PM | #15 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: WA
Posts: 28
|
Quote:
No problems at all fitting under cuffs |
|
29 May 2017, 12:41 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Chris
Location: NCR
Watch: Today's watch
Posts: 736
|
|
29 May 2017, 02:44 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 164
|
For those who's own or have owned both the Explorer II and the sub, how mich bigger does the Explorer II look in real life? The wrist shots make the difference seem pretty substantial, but of course that's up close.
|
29 May 2017, 02:58 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: On the rocks ..
Posts: 400
|
I have both , wrist similar to yours , flat , the explorer 2 does look bigger but is so well balanced on my wrist , more comfortable than the sub and blnr for me.
|
29 May 2017, 03:51 PM | #19 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,443
|
|
29 May 2017, 04:30 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Steve
Location: U.K.
Watch: 321, Snoopy 3
Posts: 4,483
|
|
29 May 2017, 07:14 PM | #21 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: London
Posts: 3,318
|
This is the widest shot I have of mine. Also have a fair few other Rolex, lots of GMT's, ceramic and 16710's alike, DJ2's and a yachtmaster, but this 42mm Explorer 2 just has something about it that is so pleasing.
The super maxi dial is unique in the Rolex line up. Why the more usual Rolex Divers aren't this size I now find quite perplexing as to my eye it would make the perfect dial for any Divers watch. Very legible, uncluttered and easy to read. It also doesn't shout 'I'm a Rolex' as obviously as subs, GMT's etc do which makes it appealing to me at least. Only had this about a month and so far it hasn't been off my wrist. It wears beautifully on my 7" wrist and imagine would do the same on your 6.5". It's as tough as old boots, dresses up and down extremely well and like everyone else who's bought one, I'm pleasantly surprised just how much I really do appreciate it more than my other Rolex in so many ways. It's a keeper for sure. I love it. Pull the trigger, you won't be disappointed I assure you. |
29 May 2017, 09:54 PM | #22 |
TRF Moderator & SubLV41 2024 Patron
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 35,510
|
Great pics I weighed heavily on giving this one a second chance a few weeks ago. There isn't anything it can't do or be worn with. It's as comfortable as a 5 digit model. Plus I like the fact that it pays tribute to the version
__________________
JJ |
29 May 2017, 10:11 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: new york
Watch: Pepsi GMT
Posts: 2,383
|
Here it is and it's for sale
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
29 May 2017, 10:24 PM | #24 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 6,253
|
My advice would be to try it on a few times and if you are still on the fence, buy a nice pre-owned 16570 which is 40mm and wears a lot smaller ... that's what I did and very happy w my decision. Over the years I've realized if I try something on and I think "is this too big on my wrist", it usually is and I've made some mistakes not listening to that voice
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
30 May 2017, 01:46 AM | #25 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,443
|
agreed, that orange hand is perfect as the nod to the 1655.
|
30 May 2017, 02:06 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: DC Metro
Posts: 327
|
|
30 May 2017, 02:51 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Norway
Watch: Sea-D, Sky-D
Posts: 134
|
__________________
AP・Panerai・Rolex |
30 May 2017, 05:43 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Fred
Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,697
|
Sure is in the running to be my alltime favorite... can't go wrong with a polar.
__________________
Greetings from Switzerland Remember, the dignity you surrender at your AD‘s doorstep will never be recovered by wearing the watch he may get you. |
30 May 2017, 06:30 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Fred
Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,697
|
Sorry, wanted to post another one, but there was a bug with that apparently due to the file extension, please disregard this post
__________________
Greetings from Switzerland Remember, the dignity you surrender at your AD‘s doorstep will never be recovered by wearing the watch he may get you. |
30 May 2017, 06:51 PM | #30 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Alan
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,204
|
216570 Polar is incredibly comfortable to wear.
Sits lower than Sub c and the crown hardly protrudes past the crown guards. Highly recommended. It suits me better than even a white dial Daytona would simply on the grounds of legibility. Hands are huge and lume is strong! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.