The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 June 2017, 01:51 AM   #1
thechad1215
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 3
Replace dial/hands on Sub 16803?

Hi all,

Been lurking for a while. I have a Sub 16803 that my dad bestowed on me several years ago. I don't think this model qualifies as vintage, but it's an "heirloom", so it's not going anywhere, and it may be vintage at some point down the road.

In the meantime, it's my daily driver, but the faded tritium lume bothers me. I've looked into Rolex service replacing the dial and hands, but I am concerned that it would kill whatever "vintageness" the watch might have.

My questions:

Anyone else faced with balancing vintage and usability?

Thoughts on having a non-rolex watchmaker replace with genuine superluminova dial/hands, so I can keep the originals?

Has anyone had trouble with Rolex service after replacing with genuine parts?

Is its potential value as a vintage already gone because I had to have Rolex replace the bezel (which popped off and was lost ) a few years ago?
thechad1215 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2017, 03:29 AM   #2
madonofrio
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Mike
Location: Philadelphia
Watch: 1016
Posts: 88
Let me give this a try...

First, I'd say it's great that you have your father's watch, so my suggestions are based on preserving something for your family down the line.

Personally I would never replace the hands and/or dial if it meant losing them. The DJ isn't that luminous anyway, is this really such a concern?

That said, it's not a particularly rare or valuable watch, so I would suggest sourcing superluminova hands/dial via the forum or a trusted seller and have an independent watch maker install them. This way you can keep the original parts- I can personally recommend LAWW or Rik Dietel.

I do not believe replacing the bezel (esp with a genuine Rolex part) impacts value at all, so not all is lost...
__________________
14060 | 15000
madonofrio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2017, 03:46 AM   #3
breitlings
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
Much of the value of the watch down the line is in the dial and hands. If you do replace them i would get it done at an independent where you can keep the originals in a safe, rsc will part exchange for the replacement per my understanding.
breitlings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2017, 04:41 AM   #4
U5512
"TRF" Member
 
U5512's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 1,125
Quote:
Originally Posted by madonofrio View Post
That said, it's not a particularly rare or valuable watch
Rolex Submariner reference 16803 is valued at >$4500 so it is a valuable watch.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mickey® View Post
It is a known issue that all of the SubC and GMTIIC's movement have reliability issues. Something to do with a spring that was introduced. I expect this to further increase the value of older Submariners and GMTIIs.
Heck why can't I start my own internet rumor and raise the prices of MY WATCHES!!!!
U5512 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2017, 04:54 AM   #5
R.W.T.
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,004
Quote:
Originally Posted by madonofrio View Post
Let me give this a try...

First, I'd say it's great that you have your father's watch, so my suggestions are based on preserving something for your family down the line.

Personally I would never replace the hands and/or dial if it meant losing them. The DJ isn't that luminous anyway, is this really such a concern?

That said, it's not a particularly rare or valuable watch, so I would suggest sourcing superluminova hands/dial via the forum or a trusted seller and have an independent watch maker install them. This way you can keep the original parts- I can personally recommend LAWW or Rik Dietel.

I do not believe replacing the bezel (esp with a genuine Rolex part) impacts value at all, so not all is lost...
I think you have the watch confused. It's not a DJ it's a 2 tone sub.
R.W.T. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2017, 05:30 AM   #6
madonofrio
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Mike
Location: Philadelphia
Watch: 1016
Posts: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by R.W.T. View Post
I think you have the watch confused. It's not a DJ it's a 2 tone sub.


Oops... you are correct, I misread on the mobile site. Need new glasses apparently.

Advice still stands though, but ignore the DJ reference (which is a 160##).
__________________
14060 | 15000
madonofrio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2017, 07:31 AM   #7
thechad1215
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 3
Thanks for the feedback. You've convinced me that losing the original dial/hands would be a mistake.

So my only concern about replacing independently (aside from paying several hundred for some glowy dots) would be if Rolex would refuse service or replace the part down the road? Any horror stories from that regard?
thechad1215 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2017, 08:01 AM   #8
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by thechad1215 View Post
Thanks for the feedback. You've convinced me that losing the original dial/hands would be a mistake.

So my only concern about replacing independently (aside from paying several hundred for some glowy dots) would be if Rolex would refuse service or replace the part down the road? Any horror stories from that regard?
You need to differentiate between a "collector" watch and a functional overhaul and either is a valid point of view. While most here fall into step with the "value is in the hands and dial"; this really only applies to those rare and otherwise hard to find examples. Does it really make sense to have degraded function, or inability to enjoyably wear a good watch, because decades after you are gone the watch may be "worth" more? And more to who?

However, lume, alone, is seldom a strong enough driver to toss perfectly good parts. Even the best Luminova service dials and hands will not be brightly readable in less than ideal situations.

Rolex will service any authentic Rolex if they have the parts to do so. They do not care where you got the authentic parts from
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2017, 12:24 PM   #9
ATX
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Austin, Texas
Watch: '79 9411
Posts: 34
I was in a very similar position recently, Austin, TX based.

I took ownership of my Opa's 9411 Sub from my father, all original and in need of some help. I had no interest in repairing the luminescence aspect of the hands/dial, however the sweep hand had dropped it's tritium and the watch needed a extensive mechanical overhaul.

I ended up sending the watch to Phillip Ridley at Watchmakers International and could not be happier with the results. They are based in Arlington, TX and he did an absolutely fabulous job on my Tudor.

Being Texas based I would highly recommend his services. I'd send it in/drop it off and have them provide an estimate and share it with the forum. I did this and was very happy I took the advice to leave the case as is. The fact that every nick, scuff and scratch was my family history really resonated.

I would not replace anything WI or other shops can save, there is just something about saving it for the next generation. They also stabilized the tritium on my other hands as well, as you can see it all looks quite seamless.

Here is the completed restoration.
Attached Images
 
ATX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2017, 12:37 PM   #10
Rolex_Rookie
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 106
How do they stabilize the tritium? Looks good!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Rolex_Rookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2017, 12:41 PM   #11
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
Five digit sub SL lume isn't great. Unless you absolutely have to have mildly glowing hands/dial I'd leave it as is. Ignoring collector value, I think watching old tritium slowly yellow is rather enjoyable.
JP Chestnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2017, 12:42 PM   #12
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolex_Rookie View Post
How do they stabilize the tritium? Looks good!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Essentially paint it with something clear. Fingernail polish and super glue are popular choices.
JP Chestnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2017, 12:57 PM   #13
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP Chestnut View Post
Essentially paint it with something clear. Fingernail polish and super glue are popular choices.
The two worst ways to stabilize.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2017, 12:14 AM   #14
phillip ridley
2024 Pledge Member
 
phillip ridley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Watch: 1971 Rolex Red Sub
Posts: 555
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP Chestnut View Post
Essentially paint it with something clear. Fingernail polish and super glue are popular choices.
Using either one of the two mentioned above could be devastating to the hands and the value of the watch. When using those chemicals, they can seep through the Tritium, darkening the hands.

I mix paint to where it closely matches the hands, (slightly lighter is better) then lightly apply. This application works very well for me and completely stabilizes the hands, not changing the color.
phillip ridley is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.