ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 June 2017, 03:10 PM | #1 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: DSSD, SD43, Pepsi,
Posts: 2,084
|
New Sea Dweller 43 redundant with DSSD?
How many CURRENT owners owners of the DSSD are planning on purchasing a new Sea Dweller 50th Anniversary?
I'm one, but am curious as to how many of you current DSSD owners will take the plunge? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
29 June 2017, 08:35 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
|
I would imagine quite a few as the bracelet width and reduced thickness would be a welcome.
|
29 June 2017, 08:41 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
|
To me its closer to a sub c than a dssd in terms of redundancy.
Would i have both? No. But i would have a new SD and a DSSD before i would have a sub c and a new SD |
29 June 2017, 08:49 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK / Spain
Watch: 39mm Explorer
Posts: 1,990
|
You could argue that any second watch is unnecessary but if you want it, just buy it.
Regards Mick |
29 June 2017, 08:58 PM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,136
|
I did. The SD43 wears much smaller than the DBlue and both can coexist
They are two very different watches and love them both. |
29 June 2017, 09:25 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sydney
Posts: 400
|
One is Rolex's alpha diving watch and the other is a larger Sub
Would keep DSSD or sell and get SD50, but not keep both |
29 June 2017, 09:40 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Scotland
Posts: 33
|
I swapped from a SubC Date to the DSSD just a few weeks ago. So far I am very happy with how it wears, in fact I am delighted, and once on the wrist (properly fitted) you don't notice the extra weight. I've not really had any issues with cuffs fitting on my shirts either. I haven't seen the SD43 yet but from the photographs I've seen I don't like the cyclops. I must admit it is harder to see the date on my DSSD than it was with my SubC Date but I love the cleaner lines of the DSSD.
|
29 June 2017, 09:58 PM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,801
|
In the Submariner/Sea-Dweller line up I would only have one Submariner. The ND, Date or the Hulk. In the DSSD it would either be the DSSD-Blue or the SD43. I like the dials but everything does not need to be black. I currently own the Hulk and am waiting on the SD43. I have owned two DSSD in the past and before the release of the SD43 I had been considering the DSSD-Blue, but no more. Going to see how the SD43 works with the Hulk.
|
29 June 2017, 10:29 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Vittorio
Location: Italy
Watch: SeaDweller Deepsea
Posts: 1,001
|
__________________
No HEV? No Party!!! If you LOVE the Sea Dweller... Join the "BDV" https://www.instagram.com/bandadellavalvola/ https://www.facebook.com/bandadellavalvola/ http://orologi.forumfree.it/?t=75294392 |
29 June 2017, 10:45 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Willem
Location: Pretoria RSA
Watch: ROLEXROLEXROLEX
Posts: 1,072
|
I would keep both my Subs (5 and 6 digit), my DSSD, my D-Blue and get a SD43. They are all unique in their own way.
__________________
Rolex Datejust II WG/SS Blue 116334 "8368xxxx" Rolex Sea-Dweller SD43 126600 "94A6xxxx" Rolex Deepsea Sea-Dweller 116660 "V84xxxx" Rolex Deepsea D-Blue Horizon 116660 "3170xxxx" Rolex Explorer II Polar 16570 "T20xxxx" Rolex Explorer II Black 216570 "G53xxxx" Rolex GMT-Master II 16710 "P32xxxx" Rolex GMT-Master II Ceramic 116710LN "V97xxxx" Rolex Submariner 16610 "Z61xxxx" Rolex Submariner Ceramic 116610LN "G79xxxx" |
30 June 2017, 12:14 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,067
|
Quote:
The SD43 is a very nice watch indeed and I always wanted a Red Sub but at the end of the day, it's very close to the DSSD in dimensions. The thickness issue is insignificant as we are really only talking about what? Less than couple of MM in total???? In contrast the DSSD will always sit flatter on the wrist regardless of wrist shape as the Case-back protrudes less and it's relationship to the drop of at the bottom of the lugs is maybe just a little better on the DSSD. I will always respect the fact that the DSSD is virtually a 100% technical exercise and form follows function. I recall reading somewhere that without the Ringlock system it would've been another 2 mm thicker. In contrast the SD43 is virtually a 100% styling exercise. I suppose if Rolex hadn't released the D-blue I would definitely have added the SD43 to my humble collection to spice it up a bit. But seeing as I am fortunate to have the D-blue which is much more stunning in the flesh than the SD43 I think I may as well pass on it as it won't add anything to my collection. It's really redundant to me. I also prefer the curved Crystal. I think I've just answered the question that's been churning through my own mind here |
|
30 June 2017, 12:58 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,055
|
I guess it depends on your overall collection and what's in it...
I don't know if I have room for two sea dwellers. Understand there's significant differences in the two and I appreciate each for its own merits, but...just don't know if I could make that work. |
30 June 2017, 01:32 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Thailand
Posts: 41
|
I will get it to complete my sd collections Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
30 June 2017, 01:43 AM | #14 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Thomas
Location: North Carolina
Watch: The Beach
Posts: 3,434
|
SD43 wears smaller than a DSSD... Correct that it can be construed to be an oversized Sub, but until Rolex "fixes" the band on the DSSD to be more proportional, it will always be top heavy...
__________________
If you wind it, it tells pretty good time (Paul Newman) |
30 June 2017, 03:49 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,143
|
I have a deep blue DSSD and a SD43. is there such a thing as having too many Rolex??
|
30 June 2017, 03:56 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,067
|
|
30 June 2017, 03:58 AM | #17 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,143
|
Quote:
I disagree. Complaining about having too many Rolex is like complaining about having too much money or beautiful women. Cry me a river. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
30 June 2017, 04:01 AM | #18 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,518
|
For me would be how many black divers do I have. It's a color issue with me. Mix up the colors and I am all in.
__________________
|
30 June 2017, 04:01 AM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,143
|
|
30 June 2017, 04:51 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Scotland
Posts: 33
|
|
30 June 2017, 05:14 AM | #21 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,518
|
Thats what I am talking about.....
__________________
|
30 June 2017, 07:05 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Alabama
Posts: 101
|
Cyclops kills it for me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'm out!!
|
30 June 2017, 07:10 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Blake
Location: US
Watch: Daytonas
Posts: 1,869
|
Me personally, I can't justify both. I prefer to keep my D Blue for the dial, no Cyclops, and king of depth rating.
|
30 June 2017, 07:11 AM | #24 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,143
|
|
30 June 2017, 07:39 AM | #25 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,143
|
|
30 June 2017, 09:58 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: PA/NYC
Posts: 94
|
Have DeepSea, and No Date. Waiting to see SD43 to decide if it will overtake either or both of those two.
|
30 June 2017, 11:38 AM | #27 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
D-Blue and SD43 are significantly different to mine eye, the DSSD and SD43 would be too similar to own both.
|
30 June 2017, 11:45 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Canada
Posts: 146
|
'If' I could only have a DSSD or a SD43? And not both, why limit yourself etc.
It would be the DSSD. While the SD43 has retained is depth rating. It is a mystery to me why a company as conservative as Rolex would change so much on an iconic watch. The SD43 seems lost. Does it want to be a Sub with its cyclops. Or does it want to be a DeepSea with its almost identical width. Aesthically, I think the SD43 is very attractive. For me, it is no longer a true SeaDweller. A similar situation is: Mercedes is changing up their G wagon after 40 years. To the overwhelming majority of G owners. The new G will not be a real G. |
30 June 2017, 12:02 PM | #29 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,460
|
Speaking as a dive watch nut, absolutely not. Very different watches, which can easily coexist in a collection.
|
30 June 2017, 02:37 PM | #30 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: EU
Watch: DSSD, BLNR, SM, GM
Posts: 933
|
Quite different in many aspects. So if pocket wise you are deep enough then go for both. I already did so.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.