The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

View Poll Results: What is the best modern Sea Dweller?
Sea Dweller 4000 171 43.96%
Deep Sea Sea Dweller 23 5.91%
Deep Sea Sea Dweller - Deep Blue 65 16.71%
Sea Dweller 43 130 33.42%
Voters: 389. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 July 2017, 10:19 AM   #1
TimeToWatch
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: TRF
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 1,757
POLL: Best modern Sea Dweller?

With the popularity of the Sea Dweller lately, I figured I'd create a poll to settle this debate once and for all.

What is the best modern Sea Dweller?
TimeToWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 11:27 AM   #2
p_surabhi
"TRF" Member
 
p_surabhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: 40° 45' 21"
Watch: Sea-Dweller
Posts: 473
Quote:
Originally Posted by aschneid View Post
With the popularity of the Sea Dweller lately, I figured I'd create a poll to settle this debate once and for all.

What is the best modern Sea Dweller?
SD 4K

Sent from my XT1097 using Tapatalk
p_surabhi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 12:07 PM   #3
TimeToWatch
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: TRF
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 1,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by p_surabhi View Post
SD 4K

Sent from my XT1097 using Tapatalk
Agreed. A future classic
TimeToWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 12:11 PM   #4
aes7.5x55
"TRF" Member
 
aes7.5x55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: Adam
Location: Ohio
Watch: ing the river flow
Posts: 359
I find the "Ring Lock System" etc text to be distracting, so I prefer the SD4k or 43, with the edge going to the SD4k for lack of cyclops.
__________________
Why is it always 10:10:31?
aes7.5x55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 12:14 PM   #5
TimeToWatch
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: TRF
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 1,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by aes7.5x55 View Post
I find the "Ring Lock System" etc text to be distracting, so I prefer the SD4k or 43, with the edge going to the SD4k for lack of cyclops.
Do you think the cyclops is here to stay? Can you imagine a DSSD with a cyclops?
TimeToWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 12:26 PM   #6
Canook
"TRF" Member
 
Canook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Jason
Location: Aussie/Malaysia
Watch: too many to list
Posts: 1,470
SD4K.. i got one 2 weeks ago and cannot seem to take it off....... love it
__________________
Current lineup
-116610LV Sub
-16233 Tapestry Datejust
-16610LV KERMIT
-116600 SD4000....16612 Yachtmaster- 16710 PEPSI
-216570(polar)
-
-Yachtmaster II 116688 126300 Datejust 41 jubilee

* Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons *
Canook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 01:05 PM   #7
teo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: amk
Posts: 792
SD4000 no cyclop, 40mm. The shortest ceramic bezel production.
teo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 01:08 PM   #8
L.J.
"TRF" Member
 
L.J.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: L.J.
Location: Caribbean
Posts: 111
116600

contained more versatile format

does not look like a bigger submariner (SD 50th)

last of its kind to benefit from all traditional original sea-dweller reference 1665 and subsequent ones with full DNA pedigree...in its original size.

Name:  Webp.net-resizeimage (6).jpg
Views: 944
Size:  269.2 KB
__________________
All the Best,
L.J.
_______________________________________________
"Eternity is a long time...Especially towards the end"
Woody Allen.
L.J. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 01:24 PM   #9
fishingbear
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
fishingbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: George
Location: Alabama
Watch: GMTsSubLVEx2SDDayt
Posts: 4,549
The 116600 is a WIS dream watch, a modern ceramic reference that was instantly turned into a classic!
Attached Images
 
fishingbear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 01:33 PM   #10
904VT
"TRF" Member
 
904VT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
D-Blue for me. 116600 is right there too.
904VT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 02:31 PM   #11
TimeToWatch
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: TRF
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 1,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishingbear View Post
The 116600 is a WIS dream watch, a modern ceramic reference that was instantly turned into a classic!
Totally agreed
TimeToWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 03:06 PM   #12
harvey
"TRF" Member
 
harvey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: rolexforums.com
Posts: 5,437
I wonder if those picking up the SD4K as the best have tried on the SD43 or for that matter even seen one...
harvey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 03:09 PM   #13
Jay-Yoo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: KR
Posts: 23
DSSD for me b/c I like bigger watches ;)

나의 SM-N910K 의 Tapatalk에서 보냄
Jay-Yoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 03:24 PM   #14
Smarties
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Asia
Posts: 714
I think they all are good.
Smarties is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 03:26 PM   #15
armen34
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: OC
Posts: 1,466
D-blue because of size and the beauty of the dial
armen34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 04:08 PM   #16
dave023
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: David
Location: Home
Watch: Classics
Posts: 773
116600
dave023 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 04:11 PM   #17
Canook
"TRF" Member
 
Canook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Jason
Location: Aussie/Malaysia
Watch: too many to list
Posts: 1,470
Unfortunately in my part of the world getting to touch a SD43 is a mission so until then I can only make my judgement based on experience


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Current lineup
-116610LV Sub
-16233 Tapestry Datejust
-16610LV KERMIT
-116600 SD4000....16612 Yachtmaster- 16710 PEPSI
-216570(polar)
-
-Yachtmaster II 116688 126300 Datejust 41 jubilee

* Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons *
Canook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 06:32 PM   #18
Time taker
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: London
Posts: 58
116600 for me too. Love it!!
Time taker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 07:03 PM   #19
Toivonen
"TRF" Member
 
Toivonen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Vittorio
Location: Italy
Watch: SeaDweller Deepsea
Posts: 1,001
This.
__________________
No HEV? No Party!!!
If you LOVE the Sea Dweller... Join the "BDV"
https://www.instagram.com/bandadellavalvola/
https://www.facebook.com/bandadellavalvola/
http://orologi.forumfree.it/?t=75294392
Toivonen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 07:20 PM   #20
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,534
The 16600 is a modern SD and my choice.

I am sure it would have won your poll.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 07:48 PM   #21
fergusmcarthur
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Fergus
Location: uk
Posts: 26
SD43, find it strange that the SD4K only popular now it's discontinued.
fergusmcarthur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 07:48 PM   #22
osamu
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,322
Hmm I really like the new SD43, but the size and cyclops were unnecessary.

The SD4k is great, but my only criticism is it's not THAT different from a sub, and the added price was not attractive, but that likely caused slow sales and a short lifespan which makes the potential future collectability of it really appealing.

I voted SD4k, but the 16600 if was an option might've been my vote.
osamu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 08:36 PM   #23
maton12
"TRF" Member
 
maton12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sydney
Posts: 400
Quote:
Originally Posted by aschneid View Post
Do you think the cyclops is here to stay? Can you imagine a DSSD with a cyclops?
Not sure how it would work with domed crystal plus being 5.5mm thick


Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
maton12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 08:48 PM   #24
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
Toss up between the D-Blue and SD43.
I prefer the dial and domed sapphire crystal of the D-Blue but the overall proportions of the SD43.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 09:19 PM   #25
meganfox17
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Kuala Lumpur , Ma
Posts: 2,011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canook View Post
my part of the world getting to touch a SD43 is a mission so
Ingenious!Did you take the shot of SD43 and the Petronas Twin Towers while lying on your back on the pavement ? You didnt ?
meganfox17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 09:30 PM   #26
Jay-Yoo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: KR
Posts: 23
DSSD is just perfect for me :)

나의 SM-N910K 의 Tapatalk에서 보냄
Jay-Yoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 09:32 PM   #27
TimeToWatch
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: TRF
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 1,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by harvey View Post
I wonder if those picking up the SD4K as the best have tried on the SD43 or for that matter even seen one...
Full disclosure, I have not. Its 43mm case size is pretty much a non-starter for me with my wrist size though. Also, a cyclops doesn't belong on a SD IMHO
TimeToWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 09:43 PM   #28
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by travisb View Post
Toss up between the D-Blue and SD43.
I prefer the dial and domed sapphire crystal of the D-Blue but the overall proportions of the SD43.
Same here, I'd probably pick the SD43 as a one or two only, and the D-B in a collection.

If they put the DB dial on the SD43 and had a red SD40, I think this would make the most people happy, but Rolex are not in the utilitarianism business, not even close.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 09:51 PM   #29
1William
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,787
I prefer the SD43 to all of the watches in the SD line-up. I have owned a couple of DSSD's and they are great watches but did not stick in the collection. I like the SD 4000 but not more than a Submariner at the same case size. The SD43 has it all for me. The 43 mm case, 22mm bracelet, Glide Lock bracelet and the red script on the dial. If the whole collection had to go the SD43 would be the last.
Attached Images
 
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2017, 09:57 PM   #30
Igerswis
"TRF" Member
 
Igerswis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Liverpool, UK
Posts: 185
My first Rolex was the DSSD and the second was the SD4000. I love them over the Submariners as there's no cyclopse and one is for casual wear whereas the other looks great under a shirt.

The SD43 is a lovely watch but straight away the cyclopse spoils it for me. At that price point you have to like pretty much everything about the watch to consider the outlay and for me it's an instant 'no'.
__________________
Omega PO9300 / Speedie / DSOM
Breitling Airwolf / Navitimer
Rolex SD4000 / DSSD
Raymond Weil Parsifal / Zenith El Primero Stratos
Casio GWF-1000 / GW-1000 / MTG-S1030
Igerswis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.