The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29 October 2017, 05:56 PM   #1
lexrj
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: SoCal
Posts: 20
Confused and disappointed - RO 15400ST

Decided to get a real watch recently and felt in love with the 15400ST in black but never actually tried one until today, I think...
When I tried at the AD today, it looked so much smaller than the pictures and videos on peoples wrists I've seen all over the internet, it was very disappointing...
The price tag on it was $17800 which matches the model and the sales person said it was the 41mm.
Is it possible that I was shown a 37mm or 39mm instead of 41mm with that price tag?
Btw my wrist is 6.75", nothing abnormal.
lexrj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2017, 09:23 PM   #2
Tomas Eriksson
"TRF" Member
 
Tomas Eriksson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Stockholm
Watch: 15707CE
Posts: 2,027
With a picture we could identify if it was a 15450 instead of 15400. What is your benchmark for size of preference? Most people tend to think the 15400 is large in size.
__________________
State of the union: 5066A,15400ST,15707CE,116610LN,26470OR and a few other…
Tomas Eriksson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2017, 09:58 PM   #3
HK Islandboy
"TRF" Member
 
HK Islandboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
I have not tried the 15400, but have tried the 26331 (41mm ROC, in case I’ve transposed some numbers).

I generally wear larger watches - ROO 42s and a 44 feature prominently in my rotation - and I did not find the ROC too small at all for my 7” wrist. Surprisingly, I liked it a lot, so much so that it’s moving near to the top of my “next to acquire” list.

As other posters have said, it would be good to see some photos.
HK Islandboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2017, 10:02 PM   #4
socalwatchcollector
"TRF" Member
 
socalwatchcollector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: John
Location: newport beach
Watch: Pateks Plural
Posts: 1,620
We always need photos here... Helps us to enable each other!
socalwatchcollector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2017, 10:04 PM   #5
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,091
Quote:
Originally Posted by socalwatchcollector View Post
We always need photos here... Helps us to enable each other!
Ain't it the truth
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2017, 10:05 PM   #6
HK Islandboy
"TRF" Member
 
HK Islandboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825


Size looked good to me, though I expect the ROC wears a bit larger than the 15400
HK Islandboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2017, 10:32 PM   #7
Hank
"TRF" Member
 
Hank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 1,674
My wrist is 6.5" and the 15400 wears quite big - more like a 43mm. I'm guessing that you tried the 15450.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2017, 12:18 AM   #8
smg8
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: England
Posts: 391
Quote:
Originally Posted by HK Islandboy View Post


Size looked good to me, though I expect the ROC wears a bit larger than the 15400
Love that dial! looks great on you
smg8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2017, 12:24 AM   #9
tng11
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,634
Quote:
Originally Posted by HK Islandboy View Post


Size looked good to me, though I expect the ROC wears a bit larger than the 15400
Looks to be a great fit on you!

The 15400 is by no means small - I think only really suitable for 7"+ wrists. I wore a 41MM ROC for a year and it was overwhelmingly big.
tng11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2017, 12:25 AM   #10
texasmade
"TRF" Member
 
texasmade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Lone Star State
Watch: AP RO 15400, FOIS
Posts: 2,384
You wouldn’t have been shown a 39mm since those have been discontinued for a few years and no one is ever going to mistake a 15202 for a 15400.
texasmade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2017, 12:33 AM   #11
G'ed
"TRF" Member
 
G'ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: RolexHQ boardroom
Posts: 1,232


15400ST silver/white dial on 6.5”-6.75” wrist. Probably borderline big for me.
G'ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2017, 12:41 AM   #12
SMD
"TRF" Member
 
SMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: SMD
Location: LGA/EWR/ORD
Watch: AP/PP
Posts: 3,701
One hit wonder
SMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2017, 12:55 AM   #13
GB-man
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,355
It wears similar to a Rolex sub but significantly thinner.
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2017, 01:13 AM   #14
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
I would guess A 41mm AP on your wrist would make you ask us if we think it's too big?


definitely Not too small
__________________
subtona is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2017, 02:25 AM   #15
HK Islandboy
"TRF" Member
 
HK Islandboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank View Post
My wrist is 6.5" and the 15400 wears quite big - more like a 43mm. I'm guessing that you tried the 15450.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That looks good on you. Very nice watch
HK Islandboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2017, 02:41 AM   #16
HK Islandboy
"TRF" Member
 
HK Islandboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by smg8 View Post
Love that dial! looks great on you
Thanks!

It’s a great piece. I think I need to pick one up
HK Islandboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2017, 02:42 AM   #17
HK Islandboy
"TRF" Member
 
HK Islandboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by tng11 View Post
Looks to be a great fit on you!

The 15400 is by no means small - I think only really suitable for 7"+ wrists. I wore a 41MM ROC for a year and it was overwhelmingly big.
HK Islandboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2017, 02:43 AM   #18
HK Islandboy
"TRF" Member
 
HK Islandboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by G'ed View Post


15400ST silver/white dial on 6.5”-6.75” wrist. Probably borderline big for me.
The size looks really good on you - to my eyes at least
HK Islandboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2017, 03:34 AM   #19
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
As the guys say I reckon you tried on the 15450 at 37mm, hardly ever hear the 15400 wears small unless maybe you have 8 inch wrists. The RO Chronos are also 41mm so you can check against them for the size.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2017, 03:53 AM   #20
AshAP
"TRF" Member
 
AshAP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ash
Location: UK
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 4,544


ROC on my wrist.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
AshAP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2017, 04:53 AM   #21
2nastie
"TRF" Member
 
2nastie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: YVR
Watch: Time Only
Posts: 2,332
Wrist presence depends on your own actual wrist. The look of the watch varies not only by your wrist size but also the “nature” of your wrist I.e round, flat, etc. I’ve seen individuals with larger wrist (6.75-7.0) than me (6.3-6.5) which looks way too big simply because their wrist is round versus mine which is flat and bonier allowing the watch and lug to lug length to sit well.
2nastie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2017, 01:34 PM   #22
lexrj
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: SoCal
Posts: 20
Thanks for all the replies and pictures guys!
Going back to the AD to try it again and make sure I have the right one.
lexrj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2017, 02:45 PM   #23
Peterandwatches
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: WA
Watch: 5167/15400/Sub/JLC
Posts: 1,023
No worries. The original Jumbo was supposed to be big. The 41 captures that essence in modern times.

Just make sure the dash by the 3 marker is about twice as long as the date. That's a quick and dirty way to verify the 15400.
Peterandwatches is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2017, 05:12 PM   #24
vermyapre
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Singapore
Watch: 1665 Great White
Posts: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by G'ed View Post


15400ST silver/white dial on 6.5”-6.75” wrist. Probably borderline big for me.
It looks perfect on you.
vermyapre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2017, 09:53 PM   #25
Patton250
2024 Pledge Member
 
Patton250's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Real Name: Brett
Location: Florida
Watch: 5205R
Posts: 5,160
You must have tried on a 37mm. I have 6.5” wrists. Here are pictures of the 41mm I had and flipped because it was too big on me. The 2nd picture is a 37mm I tried on in an AP boutique. It’s too small for me. So I have settled on 39mm being the perfect size for me.

41mm 15400ST


37mm




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Morality does not derive from consensus. It only comes from one place.

Pride goes before destruction, and haughtiness before a fall.

Often times unbelief is disguised as wisdom

Instagram - patton250
Patton250 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2017, 10:24 PM   #26
Busyboy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Uk
Posts: 1,069
This too happened to me years ago

Go back and ask to see both. Then you'll know
Busyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2017, 10:27 PM   #27
Patton250
2024 Pledge Member
 
Patton250's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Real Name: Brett
Location: Florida
Watch: 5205R
Posts: 5,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyboy View Post
This too happened to me years ago

Go back and ask to see both. Then you'll know
I have been to the AP boutiques in New York City once and the one in Miami many times. It seems to me people here know 100 times more about the brand then the employees at those boutiques do.
__________________
Morality does not derive from consensus. It only comes from one place.

Pride goes before destruction, and haughtiness before a fall.

Often times unbelief is disguised as wisdom

Instagram - patton250
Patton250 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2017, 10:41 PM   #28
tifosi
"TRF" Member
 
tifosi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Russ
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 5,760
Quote:
Originally Posted by lexrj View Post
Thanks for all the replies and pictures guys!
Going back to the AD to try it again and make sure I have the right one.
Look at the index next to the date...if it's reeeaaaly short (not even half as long as the other indicies), it is a 37mm 15450.
__________________
Russ
tifosi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2017, 11:12 PM   #29
improviz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tejas
Watch: your step
Posts: 2,806
Do they not simply have a tag hanging on the watch with reference number or something? I would think that they would probably have both references in stock, should be pretty easy to determine which is which, the 15400 being substantially larger and all...as tifosi noted, the hour marker at 3:00 next to the date is much shorter on the 450, I would just point out that if you compare pics in the link below, the one on the 15400 is actually less than half the length of the full hour markers, while on the 450 it's so short that it is about the same width of one of the bezel screws.

This article has some comparison shots:
https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/ex...mm-and-15450-3
__________________
116520 white; 16613 black; 116710; 16570 polar; 16600. AP 15400; 15703. Blancpain Fifty Fathoms. Glashutte Sport Evo GMT. Omega Planet Ocean 2907.50.91; Planet Ocean Liquidmetal LE 222.30.42.20.01.001; Seamaster 2255.80.00. Breitling Crosswind, white. Panerai PAM 005. VC Overseas Chrono, black.
improviz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.