|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
11 December 2017, 01:25 AM
|
#31 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,653
|
I would keep the 16710
|
|
|
|
11 December 2017, 01:28 AM
|
#32 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,097
|
750, no contest IMO
|
|
|
|
|
11 December 2017, 01:36 AM
|
#33 |
|
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,693
|
Frankly the 16750 seems much better; not a fan of the three time zone GMT IIs. Not fond of the date setting.
|
|
|
|
|
11 December 2017, 01:44 AM
|
#34 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 2,940
|
I currently wear my D-serial 16710 daily.
__________________
Two Factor Authentication Enabled On My Account. |
|
|
|
|
11 December 2017, 02:06 AM
|
#35 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,002
|
Listen to the mattedialdoc on this one: keep the 16750 and wear it like you stole it. I’ve worked my way from moderns to now I have all 4 digit models plus the 16750. Love it. It’s all the magic of the 1675 with a quickset date. I disagree that it is any less robust than a 16710. An acrylic crystal is more durable than a sapphire. Just buff out any scratches. And acrylic has a warmth that sapphire can never match. Do you really like staring at those greasy smudges on a sapphire crystal
 . Get that 16750 serviced and pressure tested and it’s as good as the day it was born!Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
