ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 January 2018, 03:20 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,809
|
Oyster Bracelet "stretch" - 5 digit vs 6 digit
There have been several threads which reference whether bracelet "stretch" will be any less on solid link oysters than hollow link oysters.
Does anyone have a 2007 6 digit SS GMT (the first year they were made) and a 2007 5 digit SS Sub that were both worn a lot and which would provide a fair comparison on hollow vs solid. Or if someone can post pictures of a solid link 2007 SS GMT showing any bracelet stretch, I'm sure someone else can post pictures of a hollow link 2007ish SS Sub. |
20 January 2018, 01:54 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Chris
Location: Concord, Ma
Watch: your back
Posts: 422
|
This is simple physics.
Less stretch on a solid link vs hollow link My 16610LV stretched a noticeable amount from daily wear over the course of 2 years. My 116710N saw minimal stretch over the course of almost 7 years daily wear. |
20 January 2018, 02:17 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Sandy
Location: England.
Watch: 14060M 2 liner
Posts: 3,204
|
It was certainly the Achilles heel for Rolex, and it took them long enough to fix the issue of bracelet stretch.
|
20 January 2018, 02:55 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: S.C
Location: Dubai
Watch: DD 40
Posts: 156
|
I thought my sub c had stretched quite a lot when I took it off and shook the bracelet as it hung. However I compared it to a friends new one and it did the exact same. The newer watches don’t stretch any where near as much as the old ones from what I’ve seen.
__________________
Instagram: DubaiWatchGuy |
20 January 2018, 03:57 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 713
|
Two tone are the worst, especially the hollow link 5 digit. Only one winner when gold rubs against SS.
|
20 January 2018, 02:35 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,809
|
Quote:
??? |
|
20 January 2018, 02:45 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
|
Wouldn't more surface area contact around bracelet pins = More wear? To both pin and surrounding void? Obviously there is less material to wear out on a hollow link - I'm not a physician.. evidently but. All I know is my father's '97 Tag has solid links and is now quite wobbly, though comfy.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.