The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 January 2018, 03:20 PM   #1
No SUBctitute
"TRF" Member
 
No SUBctitute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,809
Oyster Bracelet "stretch" - 5 digit vs 6 digit

There have been several threads which reference whether bracelet "stretch" will be any less on solid link oysters than hollow link oysters.

Does anyone have a 2007 6 digit SS GMT (the first year they were made) and a 2007 5 digit SS Sub that were both worn a lot and which would provide a fair comparison on hollow vs solid.

Or if someone can post pictures of a solid link 2007 SS GMT showing any bracelet stretch, I'm sure someone else can post pictures of a hollow link 2007ish SS Sub.
No SUBctitute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2018, 01:54 AM   #2
brandxbrand
"TRF" Member
 
brandxbrand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Chris
Location: Concord, Ma
Watch: your back
Posts: 422
This is simple physics.

Less stretch on a solid link vs hollow link

My 16610LV stretched a noticeable amount from daily wear over the course of 2 years.
My 116710N saw minimal stretch over the course of almost 7 years daily wear.
brandxbrand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2018, 02:17 AM   #3
SeaDweller50
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Sandy
Location: England.
Watch: 14060M 2 liner
Posts: 3,204
It was certainly the Achilles heel for Rolex, and it took them long enough to fix the issue of bracelet stretch.
SeaDweller50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2018, 02:55 AM   #4
S.C
"TRF" Member
 
S.C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: S.C
Location: Dubai
Watch: DD 40
Posts: 156
I thought my sub c had stretched quite a lot when I took it off and shook the bracelet as it hung. However I compared it to a friends new one and it did the exact same. The newer watches don’t stretch any where near as much as the old ones from what I’ve seen.
__________________
Instagram: DubaiWatchGuy
S.C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2018, 03:57 AM   #5
kzm40
"TRF" Member
 
kzm40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 713
Two tone are the worst, especially the hollow link 5 digit. Only one winner when gold rubs against SS.
kzm40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2018, 02:35 PM   #6
No SUBctitute
"TRF" Member
 
No SUBctitute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,809
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ra_88 View Post
It was certainly the Achilles heel for Rolex, and it took them long enough to fix the issue of bracelet stretch.
Some on here have contended that solid link bracelets will "stretch" as much as the hollow link bracelets because both of them have pins and holes....and that's what "stretches."

???
No SUBctitute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2018, 02:45 PM   #7
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandxbrand View Post
This is simple physics.

Less stretch on a solid link vs hollow link

My 16610LV stretched a noticeable amount from daily wear over the course of 2 years.
My 116710N saw minimal stretch over the course of almost 7 years daily wear.
Wouldn't more surface area contact around bracelet pins = More wear? To both pin and surrounding void? Obviously there is less material to wear out on a hollow link - I'm not a physician.. evidently but. All I know is my father's '97 Tag has solid links and is now quite wobbly, though comfy.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.