ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Zelly · 18 February 2018, 04:18 PM

I need a new (used dial) for my 1967 precision. I have come up with this and want your opinion please. Is it an original and what year/decade would it be from. Thanks in advance.

uncleluck · 18 February 2018, 07:34 PM

I’m certainly no guru but looking at the position of the crown (see how wonky it is in relation to the minute markers) it doesn’t look very original Rolex to me. In fact there’s something odd about the whole look, almost like it’s a Timex dial or something.

Printing is also wonky

Zelly · 19 February 2018, 02:08 AM

It comes from a trusted seller on crono 24 who guarantees its authenticity ie not a repainted. But I’d love more imput. Thank you uncleluck for your assessment

uncleluck · 19 February 2018, 02:32 AM

Ok, well I wouldn’t be so sure as to me it looks off. Just googling 1967 precision shows much nicer printing (finer on the precision & a difference on the Rolex Oyster text too)

Just looks like generic printing to me and the fact the crown isn’t in the right place too...

MonBK · 19 February 2018, 02:37 AM

Looks ok to me.

Richard Carver · 19 February 2018, 04:30 AM

It's original. Got some corrosion on the markers though.

uncleluck · 19 February 2018, 06:04 AM

There you go, I’d have lost that one! Just to add this is why I didn’t like the printing (so you can at least see the method in my madness)

I know there’s always variants on printing it just looked too chunky and ‘times new roman’ to me as everything I found was finer on the ‘precision’

The crown being off centre just had me on the offensive I guess! Not exactly a tiny amount (although the crown itself looks perfect) Although after I saw that I noticed a few the same as that.

This is the sort of thing I was comparing.

Anyway, apologies but at least you have two solid answers. Good luck!

Zelly · 19 February 2018, 06:26 AM

Your opinion is much appreciated thank you for your efforts as well now to determine what date”ish” it’s from. ? 60’s would be perfect.

Tom1675 · 19 February 2018, 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zelly

Your opinion is much appreciated thank you for your efforts as well now to determine what date”ish” it’s from. ? 60’s would be perfect.

If you let us know the serial number between the lugs at 6 o'clock we can get you a kinda specific range.

Zelly · 19 February 2018, 09:15 AM

Here is the back

Zelly · 20 February 2018, 08:03 AM

Any comments about the back?

MonBK · 20 February 2018, 08:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zelly

Any comments about the back?

No

18 February 2018, 04:18 PM	#1
Zelly "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2017 Location: BC,Canada Posts: 14	Need help from dial guru's! I need a new (used dial) for my 1967 precision. I have come up with this and want your opinion please. Is it an original and what year/decade would it be from. Thanks in advance. Attached Images

19 February 2018, 09:15 AM	#10
Zelly "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2017 Location: BC,Canada Posts: 14	Here is the back Attached Images

18 February 2018, 07:34 PM	#2
uncleluck "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: England Posts: 518	I’m certainly no guru but looking at the position of the crown (see how wonky it is in relation to the minute markers) it doesn’t look very original Rolex to me. In fact there’s something odd about the whole look, almost like it’s a Timex dial or something. Printing is also wonky

19 February 2018, 02:08 AM	#3
Zelly "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2017 Location: BC,Canada Posts: 14	It comes from a trusted seller on crono 24 who guarantees its authenticity ie not a repainted. But I’d love more imput. Thank you uncleluck for your assessment

19 February 2018, 02:32 AM	#4
uncleluck "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: England Posts: 518	Ok, well I wouldn’t be so sure as to me it looks off. Just googling 1967 precision shows much nicer printing (finer on the precision & a difference on the Rolex Oyster text too) Just looks like generic printing to me and the fact the crown isn’t in the right place too...

19 February 2018, 02:37 AM	#5
MonBK Banned Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Kingstown Posts: 58,279	Looks ok to me.

19 February 2018, 04:30 AM	#6
Richard Carver "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: US Posts: 2,237	It's original. Got some corrosion on the markers though.

19 February 2018, 06:04 AM	#7
uncleluck "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: England Posts: 518	There you go, I’d have lost that one! Just to add this is why I didn’t like the printing (so you can at least see the method in my madness) I know there’s always variants on printing it just looked too chunky and ‘times new roman’ to me as everything I found was finer on the ‘precision’ The crown being off centre just had me on the offensive I guess! Not exactly a tiny amount (although the crown itself looks perfect) Although after I saw that I noticed a few the same as that. This is the sort of thing I was comparing. Anyway, apologies but at least you have two solid answers. Good luck!

19 February 2018, 06:26 AM	#8
Zelly "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2017 Location: BC,Canada Posts: 14	Your opinion is much appreciated thank you for your efforts as well now to determine what date”ish” it’s from. ? 60’s would be perfect.

20 February 2018, 08:03 AM	#11
Zelly "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2017 Location: BC,Canada Posts: 14	Any comments about the back?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)