The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 3 April 2018, 09:38 AM   #31
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,129
Personally I would not. Much prefer the 114060.
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 09:45 AM   #32
THC
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
THC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Tom
Location: Mandeville La
Watch: 126333
Posts: 10,666
Quote:
Originally Posted by stwalker View Post
Don’t know. The AD won’t give me a trade in value on the 114060 until he sources the GMT. I’m hoping under 2k extra.
To me, you are better off selling yours prior, then buying a BLNR
THC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 09:47 AM   #33
watchmework
"TRF" Member
 
watchmework's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: DC
Watch: 126710BLRO, 116600
Posts: 7,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by THC View Post
To me, you are better off selling yours prior, then buying a BLNR


+1 either way though, I wouldn’t do it. The Sub is a more versatile piece and a classic.
watchmework is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 10:27 AM   #34
nikesupremedunk
"TRF" Member
 
nikesupremedunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Andrew
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,227
I have both and I would recommend keeping both. I would always choose the BLNR over my ND but the whole reason why I bought the sub was because I wanted a better daily than the BLNR. There's enough room to keep both IMO.
__________________
| 116234 DJ36 | 116610LN SubC | 116520 Daytona | BlackBay 58 Blue |
nikesupremedunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 10:31 AM   #35
101031-28
"TRF" Member
 
101031-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 1665
Posts: 4,764
In. A. Heartbeat.
__________________
He could not just wear a watch. It had to be a Rolex.

Ian Fleming
101031-28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 10:34 AM   #36
viper
"TRF" Member
 
viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northeast
Posts: 943
No way, keep the Sub.
__________________
16610LV
16200
116600
116500
viper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 10:42 AM   #37
c41006
"TRF" Member
 
c41006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Joshua
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Pelagos
Posts: 7,933
Depends... will he let you drive the batmobile?
c41006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 10:48 AM   #38
Maiden
"TRF" Member
 
Maiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,652
I wouldn’t but I’m not a fan of the blnr. If you like it though, then why not.
__________________
Rolex 116613LN
Rolex 16610LN
Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 41mm
Omega Geneve
Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAY2112
Orient Ray 2
Maiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 10:55 AM   #39
c0deman99
"TRF" Member
 
c0deman99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: rCa
Location: US
Watch: Subs
Posts: 387
Quote:
Originally Posted by stwalker View Post
Should I do it?
OP, I actually just did this two weeks ago.

I have mixed feelings about it. The Sub fit the bill on what I wanted out of a watch. Low key, great watch, last forever, and a clean dial.

Honestly, I bought the BLNR bc of the hype and the opportunity. It is a very nice watch and the dial/bezel combo is great.

It doesn’t blow me away but neither did the sub. I guess I knew I can always get the ND sub back and the BLNR may be harder to obtain at a decent price in the future. I don’t know that for sure, but it did weigh on my decision

They are both well rounded and fine watches. Good luck.
__________________
116610LV—V-Serial
116610LN—10x different than the green one!
116710BLNR

Daytona
c0deman99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 10:59 AM   #40
meganfox17
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Kuala Lumpur , Ma
Posts: 2,011
You'ld rather hide behind a woman's skirt like a coward than flip a Rolex like a real man.....or is it the other way round?
meganfox17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 11:00 AM   #41
CDNWatchNut
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Sherwood Park, Ab
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,509
I definitely wouldn't. The sub is a great daily wearer, and while I like the BLNR, to me its an occasional wearer in a collection.
CDNWatchNut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 11:13 AM   #42
JRT
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Taiwan
Watch: Rolex BLNR
Posts: 2,308
Go ahead in a heartbeat.
JRT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 12:52 PM   #43
MARGARITATIME
"TRF" Member
 
MARGARITATIME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Ft. Lauderdale
Watch: 116610lv, 116710BL
Posts: 279
I started with a Subc (3 weeks). Traded for a LV (2 weeks). Then picked up a BLNR (1 week). I love my duo now. I do miss my Subc though since it was my first Rolex. My thought was it was easier to replace if I really need to buy it again. The Subc has a beautiful dial. I actually didn't miss the date. Now that both my watches have a date I like looking at it. I will say the Sub is heavier and I like the non PCL's. I do love the BLNR bezel and GMT function. If I had to choose one I would keep the LV.
MARGARITATIME is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 12:53 PM   #44
Khans14
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 338
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zestywesley View Post
Same here, I bought mine at an AD and it didn’t excite me as much as a Sub. BLNR is possibly the most overhyped group think watch in the Rolex lineup.
Totally agree.
Khans14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 12:58 PM   #45
904VT
"TRF" Member
 
904VT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
I would add rather than trade. Plus the Glidelock is unbeatable
904VT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 01:07 PM   #46
Seaswirl
"TRF" Member
 
Seaswirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,761
I prefer Subs, so no.
Seaswirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 01:08 PM   #47
ferrissteve11
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 1,116
I'd trade a no date, but a sub date I'd have to really think and ponder over.
ferrissteve11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 01:10 PM   #48
Hard_Six
"TRF" Member
 
Hard_Six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Trey
Location: Texas
Watch: those three’s roll
Posts: 3,036
Do it!
Hard_Six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 02:50 PM   #49
GSBC
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 329
Absolutely.
The GMT complication is awesome and infinitely more useful (to me) than a time only watch. The wrist presence and look of the BLNR are miles ahead in comparison as well.
GSBC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 03:17 PM   #50
Fleetlord
2024 Pledge Member
 
Fleetlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 6,024
Not enough information
Fleetlord is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 03:24 PM   #51
SeaDweller50
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Sandy
Location: England.
Watch: 14060M 2 liner
Posts: 3,204
Never buy a watch based on what other people think. Buy and wear the watch that YOU like most, not what I like.
SeaDweller50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 03:52 PM   #52
MHB
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: VTNR, 214270, FXD
Posts: 442
The 114060 is pure Rolex minimalism at it's best. I say add.
MHB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 05:29 PM   #53
116710er
"TRF" Member
 
116710er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: 'murica
Watch: yer six.
Posts: 576
I'm in the "add" camp too but if I had to pick one or the other, I'd pick BNLR every time. I love the blue in the bezel and it's not so bright that it stands out like crazy. It's just a nice little touch of color. Plus the GMT function is something I actually use. The Sub-C's bezel is very bland in comparison and not as useful as I don't dive with a Rolex...I use a dive computer and wear a Seiko cuz if I loose it, bang it up, break it, etc...so what.

I really don't understand the "overhyped" comments. The BLNR is a beautiful watch. It's not overhyped, it's desirable because it's gorgeous. Plus it's the first time Rolex has used a Black and Blue bezel, it's a two color single block of ceramic and it lumes blue. My only complaint is the PCL but I wish none of the stainless Rolex watches had PCL, not even the Daytona.
116710er is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 05:34 PM   #54
efti
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Muscat
Watch: Batman,SubC & LMPO
Posts: 164
BLNR but this is just me, if you like the design of the No Date stick to it and be happy


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
efti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 05:34 PM   #55
sdh1980
"TRF" Member
 
sdh1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: London
Watch: 116500 LN
Posts: 361
Quote:
Originally Posted by stwalker View Post
Don’t know. The AD won’t give me a trade in value on the 114060 until he sources the GMT. I’m hoping under 2k extra.
Not worth it IMO
sdh1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 01:03 AM   #56
Zestywesley
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: San Jose
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by 116710er View Post
I'm in the "add" camp too but if I had to pick one or the other, I'd pick BNLR every time. I love the blue in the bezel and it's not so bright that it stands out like crazy. It's just a nice little touch of color. Plus the GMT function is something I actually use. The Sub-C's bezel is very bland in comparison and not as useful as I don't dive with a Rolex...I use a dive computer and wear a Seiko cuz if I loose it, bang it up, break it, etc...so what.

I really don't understand the "overhyped" comments. The BLNR is a beautiful watch. It's not overhyped, it's desirable because it's gorgeous. Plus it's the first time Rolex has used a Black and Blue bezel, it's a two color single block of ceramic and it lumes blue. My only complaint is the PCL but I wish none of the stainless Rolex watches had PCL, not even the Daytona.
The BLNR is way too flashy/blingy. The bezel’s numbers are large and obvious making the whole watch loud. It’s something one would understand only if they own it, not just by drooling and spreading more group think on the forums.
Zestywesley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 01:10 AM   #57
Jidonsu
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 258
I have the 114060, and I'm have the BLNR arriving today. I'm not 100% sure if it's a keeper though, so I'll have to see how I feel once I have it on my wrist a few times. I will most likely never sell the 114060. I suspect you'll know better once you can see the BLNR in person.
__________________
Current Collection

Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15400 | Rolex 114060 | Rolex 116710BLNR | Tudor Black Bay GMT | Tudor Pelagos Blue | IWC Mark XVIII Le Petit Prince |
Jidonsu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 04:54 AM   #58
ikincooper
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Niki
Location: UK
Watch: Too many
Posts: 837
I went through the same thought processes when I was looking to buy my BLNR but in the end decided to add to my Sub (ND) and am glad I did. Both get equal wear and I appreciate both individually. Yes I may now trade my Sub in for a SD4K but a diver will definitely stay to complement the BLNR. Similar but different enough to have both!
ikincooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 05:34 AM   #59
Seibei
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: New Zealand
Watch: 114060
Posts: 2,630
I am a less is more kind of guy. 114060 for me.
Seibei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 05:23 PM   #60
116710er
"TRF" Member
 
116710er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: 'murica
Watch: yer six.
Posts: 576
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zestywesley View Post
The BLNR is way too flashy/blingy. The bezel’s numbers are large and obvious making the whole watch loud. It’s something one would understand only if they own it, not just by drooling and spreading more group think on the forums.
Well we'll just have to disagree. I don't think it's "loud" but then again, I only own two BLNR's so what would I know...
116710er is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.