ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: What's the toughest for real world outdoor use | |||
114060 | 74 | 49.33% | |
14060M | 15 | 10.00% | |
216570 | 30 | 20.00% | |
16600 | 31 | 20.67% | |
Voters: 150. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
3 June 2018, 09:48 PM | #31 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: HK & USA
Watch: GMTs,1803, 16610LV
Posts: 2,001
|
Quote:
It seems more dubious that Rolex would claim an engineering improvement if there isn't one, pulling it out of thin air if there were no numbers/tests to back it up. To answer the OP, increased WR capability (due mainly to caseback thickness) past what all Oyster cases can withstand doesn't translate to an increase in real-world robustness or durability in terms of surviving knocks and bumps etc. The only real difference in the choices would probably come down to the fewer things that could go wrong = more durable. The Explorer II doesn't have a moving bezel that can be knocked off, broken (if ceramic), or lost. All your dive watch choices do, so the 216570 gets my vote. |
|
3 June 2018, 11:16 PM | #32 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
Quote:
Up to 50% of what? 50% vs. KIF? 50% vs. other brands? 50%. vs. no shock system at all? Paraflex is first and foremost just another step towards vertical integration. |
|
4 June 2018, 09:41 PM | #33 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: HK & USA
Watch: GMTs,1803, 16610LV
Posts: 2,001
|
Quote:
Are you suggesting that no improvement to KIF is possible, or that such performance can't be measured? |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.