ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 July 2018, 02:59 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Here, everywhere
Posts: 1,244
|
Contrast between Rose Gold and Steel on 126711?
To all 126711 owners out there, may I ask how pronounced the contrast is between the RG center links and the steel on the bracelet, compared to let’s say, YG and steel? Is it closer in tone? One of the reasons why I don’t like the YG two tone models is because of the stark contrast between the metals and was wondering if this is somewhat more muted on the 126711. Any thoughts would be much appreciated.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
3 July 2018, 03:32 PM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: CA
Posts: 737
|
I can’t say whether it’s more pronounced or muted compared to tt yg but I can tell you that the everose rolesor tt has more contrast than say a full everose gold. Most common word I see people describing the rg tt is that it “pops.”
I do however think the rg tt is a beautiful watch if you want it to pop. I personally chose the full everose gold because it didn’t pop as much. |
3 July 2018, 06:29 PM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,763
|
RG/SS is a lot less "flashy" than YG/SS, but what's not to like ?
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
3 July 2018, 06:33 PM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Australia
Watch: @ kostastimepieces
Posts: 5,275
|
|
3 July 2018, 07:52 PM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
RG is much closer to SS in fact in certain light is looks like SS.
|
3 July 2018, 09:45 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Kyle
Location: Salt Lake City
Watch: 116500LN,116519LN
Posts: 792
|
|
3 July 2018, 09:53 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
|
3 July 2018, 10:16 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 649
|
I had the exact same concern as you, as I don't consider myself a TT guy because of the stark contrast.
The CHNR is different. The contrast is subtle; yet not so subtle that it doesn't simply blend in. This is a delicate balance, and IMHO, Rolex nailed it. The colors of this watch vary in different lighting which is really cool. Overall, it's very classy. |
3 July 2018, 10:41 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: T
Location: AZ, NV, CA
Posts: 6,490
|
I'd say the contrast is slightly subdued compared to SS/YG, however not much, there's no mistaking it for gold.
|
4 July 2018, 12:43 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: South Africa
Posts: 873
|
I find it more appealing than YG/SS. I also don't see myself as a TT guy, but the RG/SS has a very different look to it. The contrast is definitely not as strong as on YG/SS.
My opinion is based on handling it in store under store lighting, not natural light. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.