Why men wear watches that don’t tell time

[Romeojk]

I guess those people (in the article) don’t keep them working and don’t frequent TRF
https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-men...ime-1531155881

ON TREND
Why Men Are Wearing Watches That Don’t Tell Time
What’s the point of wearing a watch when you’ve got a phone glued to your palm? For some, it’s all in the looks
THOUGH HE FREQUENTLY WORE a Cartier Tank watch, Andy Warhol didn’t use it to keep the time. “I wear a Tank because it’s the watch to wear,” Mr. Warhol once said, according to a September 2017 article in the New York Times. He would never even wind his wristwatch—it was for looks, not to look at.
Today, it seems, style-conscious men are adopting the Pop artist’s perspective, treating their increasingly redundant wristwatches more like jewelry than a tool—a move that traditionalists might instinctively want to ridicule. Judson Lee, 38, a director at an advertising agency in Fayetteville, Ark., owns three watches but almost never sets them. All of his timepieces are mechanical and therefore require winding for an accurate read, unlike quartz watches which can dependably rely on a battery. He thinks of each watch as “an object of style,” an accessory that rounds out an outfit as a bracelet would. He wasn’t always indifferent to conventional timekeeping: “Pre-iPhone I certainly set them, kept them at the correct time and date, all that jazz,” he said. These days, when he wants to check the hour of day, he simply takes out his iPhone.

We are as much about leisure
as we are about business.

With smartphones practically glued to our palms at all times and smartwatches muscling in, traditional timepieces are just no longer as vital as they once were in any practical sense. Fears among watch execs that the Apple Watch, introduced in 2015, would snatch up wrist real estate were confirmed in the fourth quarter of 2017 when industry researcher Canalys and IDC reported that Apple sold more watches than the entire Swiss watch industry combined. Ramsey Hidmi, 28, who works in asset management in Boston, said that few people he knows wear a watch at all, “and if they do, it’s an Apple Watch.” An outlier among them, Mr. Hidmi straps on a 12-year-old Rolex that he inherited from his father. Not that he ever bothers to set the time. “It’s an heirloom piece,” said Mr. Hidmi.
It’s not just casual wearers who rationalize strapping on comatose tickers, though. “I rely on my phone to tell me the time and I’m a mechanical watch collector,” said James Lamdin, the founder of Analog/Shift, a vintage watch retailer in New York City. With an extensive collection at his disposal, Mr. Lamdin sometimes switches watches multiple times a day, and he doesn’t pause to set each one. It’s more accurate just to check his phone. “Any digital time-keeping device, be it a phone or a G-Shock is going to keep much better time than any mechanical watch, no matter how high-grade,” he said, alluding to the fact that mechanical watches tend to speed up or slow down as the day goes on. “One does not wear a vintage watch to tell the time. You wear a vintage watch to experience the passage of time,” declared Mr. Lamdin, obliquely referring to an older watch’s potential to accrue value over the years.
Mr. Lamdin said he’s seen more “fashion forward” types gravitating towards that aged look of a vintage mechanical watch, with little interest in the ticking cogs beneath the glass. “It tends to be some of the super-fashiony maven people who are all about style,” he said of men who go that route, adding that he’s also seen collectors who will buy a nonfunctioning watch and wear it without having it properly serviced simply because they like it as a “statement piece.”
To most sane humans, this might seem an absurd way to think about a watch, especially when mechanical timepieces can cost as much as a mid-tier BMW sedan. Like wearing glasses to appear bookish when you’re perfectly sighted, there is something pretentious about strapping on an idle timepiece you don’t need. It’s pure flash, telegraphing status but just a pose.
Yet in all fairness, most men’s accessories don’t serve a purpose beyond looks. Ties and pocket squares are worn because they look pretty and add polish and, yes, status. If an iPhone or a computer clock can do a better job than a watch, then perhaps it’s entirely defensible to focus on the watch’s traditional second duty as a pure accessory. “At this stage [a watch] is really like a nice pair of socks, because it brings the look together and makes a man look more finished,” said Basha Singh, the director of made-to-measure and VIP styling at Ralph Lauren’s flagship location in New York. Each morning, Mr. Singh straps on one of his handful of watches with a suit and tie for work, but more often than not, that watch is only right twice a day.

[SearChart]

I need to pay to read the article.

[Romeojk]

Originally Posted by SearChart

I need to pay to read the article.

Wow, that’s weird, I originally saw it in my News feed on my iPhone

[GradyPhilpott]

Phone or no phone, ubiquitous clocks or no ubiquitous clocks, I want the the device on my wrist to tell the correct time to within about a minute.

Besides being fascinated with watches and finding them to be a source of enjoyment, their main function for me is to have the time in a very convenient location at all times.

I'm glad that there are clocks everywhere including on my phone, my computer, microwave, walls, dashboard, but none of those are substitutes for my ever present wrist.

[TheVTCGuy]

Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott

Phone or no phone, ubiquitous clocks or no ubiquitous clocks, I want the the device on my wrist to tell the correct time to within about a minute.

Besides being fascinated with watches and finding them to be a source of enjoyment, their main function for me is to have the time in a very convenient location at all times.

I'm glad that there are clocks everywhere including on my phone, my computer, microwave, walls, dashboard, but none of those are substitutes for my ever present wrist.

Yep When I’m not wearing my watch I find myself looking at my empty wrist by habbit more then once.

[Rock]

I can't think of anything that I have ever owned that was/is just for looks including my haircut. Sounds a bit shallow.

[BabyHuey]

Originally Posted by Romeojk

THOUGH HE FREQUENTLY WORE a Cartier Tank watch, Andy Warhol didn’t use it to keep the time. “I wear a Tank because it’s the watch to wear,” Mr. Warhol once said, according to a September 2017 article in the New York Times. He would never even wind his wristwatch—it was for looks, not to look at.

My first post and in response to the OP. Some people choose to wear their watches as a fashion statement or accessory. Mr. Warhol was an avant-garde artist so perhaps one must allow for a certain degree of eccentricity and impracticality in these cases.

On the other hand and though their timepieces are probably set to the current time, many women are electing to wear men's Rolexes as a personal fashion statement as well.

[bdex75]

Now I’m not a stickler for my watches being COSC but it must be close.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[dddrees]

Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott

Phone or no phone, ubiquitous clocks or no ubiquitous clocks, I want the the device on my wrist to tell the correct time to within about a minute.

Besides being fascinated with watches and finding them to be a source of enjoyment, their main function for me is to have the time in a very convenient location at all times.

I'm glad that there are clocks everywhere including on my phone, my computer, microwave, walls, dashboard, but none of those are substitutes for my ever present wrist.

This

[Star Ferry]

Comes across as vain IMO. Better to have both aesthetic and function

[Burlington]

Originally Posted by Star Ferry

Comes across as vain IMO. Better to have both aesthetic and function

Yep - functional aesthetics all the way

[East Bay Rider]

It's a tool first and must be functional as such.
Mass appeal or aesthetic jewelry is second.

[CRM114]

Originally Posted by Rock

I can't think of anything that I have ever owned that was/is just for looks including my haircut. Sounds a bit shallow.

You never owned a tie? Ever?

[Rock]

Actually the tie served a very definite function. It kept me employed because it was required business attire. As soon as I got a job where it wasn't, I stopped wearing them.

[codecow]

Sometimes I don’t set mine especially if it’s a complicated piece. I have a cell phone in my pocket that is more accurate and more complicated.

[Rockrolex]

Originally Posted by codecow

Sometimes I don’t set mine especially if it’s a complicated piece. I have a cell phone in my pocket that is more accurate and more complicated.

My complicated pieces are kept on winders. I wear a mechanical watch because it tells me the time. I sometimes forget my phone, but I never forget my wristwatch because it is always strapped to my wrist.