ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
11 August 2018, 06:39 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 116
|
BLRO vs BLNR launch
I need your insights please.
I’m on a few lists for the BLRO SS but don’t expect to receive it any time soon. However I was asking myself. Was the hype similar when the BLNR hit the market back in 2013? Meaning a few crazy 1 or 2 years before the waiting time reaches a “healthy” 6-12 months? I was not following the prices and interests in that model back then as I am today. But I am sure a lot of you guys did and can compare it to today’s situation. |
11 August 2018, 06:44 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
|
absolutely not even close. The BLRO launch was even bigger than the Daytona C launch. Without making any subjective judgments on the watches (although i prefer the BLRO) its undeniable that watch market for hot watches is in a completely different place today, so its not even a comparison.
Daytona C waitlists absolutely didn't close within 24 hours. BLRO lists did at a lot of AD's. ... so if its bigger initially than the Daytona its way bigger than the BLNR
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition) |
11 August 2018, 06:48 AM | #3 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
|
Quote:
Completely agree. It’s a whole different watch world right now. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
11 August 2018, 06:48 AM | #4 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,173
|
Quote:
But, demand is higher now than ever. That's a fact. |
|
11 August 2018, 06:52 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 116610LN, 116500LN
Posts: 1,385
|
I would disagree with Tyler and say the launches of the SS BLRO and Daytona C felt about the same for me. With both watches it was essentially the excitement of the ceramic bezel coming to a SS model. With the Daytona C it was expected, of course, and I'd say with the SS BLRO it was a bit of a surprise. But the hype for the watches feels about the same.
The big difference is that the BLRO is launching in an environment of complete scarcity of professional models. So the usual hype and clamor (and gray market prices) seem magnified because you can't get any SS watch, much less the hottest new release. |
11 August 2018, 06:52 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2018
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: USA
Watch: P-01
Posts: 11,772
|
Anyone offered a BLRO should take it. Whats funny is all those people that complained about
1) rasberry 2) end link 3) jubilee It has mass appeal and limited alternatives/substitutes... the substitutes are even hard to get. |
11 August 2018, 06:56 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
|
Quote:
I happened to be in my AD a day or two after and he said he phone hadn't stopped ringing. The daytona was a steady stream of interest but the BLRO was like a bomb going off at once. Daytona will win the race though.
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition) |
|
11 August 2018, 06:59 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 116
|
|
11 August 2018, 06:59 AM | #9 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 116610LN, 116500LN
Posts: 1,385
|
Quote:
Or maybe all the people who were still on the 116520 lists just assumed they'd be transferred to the 116500 lists and didn't bother to call =) |
|
11 August 2018, 07:00 AM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,173
|
The market seems to be far more saturated with flippers now than in 2016 or 2013. Lists are larger for everything that's hard to get.
|
11 August 2018, 07:01 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
|
the GMT isnt a popular complication where as a chrono seems to be, even if supply is the same. More people chose a sub c vs a GMT LN for example. They look almost the same to be honest and the GMT has an added complication. People still buy the sub.
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition) |
11 August 2018, 07:26 AM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 116610LN, 116500LN
Posts: 1,385
|
I’ve always wondered why chronos were so popular. My theory is that it’s a complication you can interact with. Even a GMT, you just set the hands and look at it. But with a chrono you can push buttons and people love pushing buttons.
|
11 August 2018, 07:29 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
|
I sort of get the idea of playing with a chrono as being interactive, and it looks interesting with the subdials so it makes sense. What i will never understand is the GMT vs Sub thing. WR is irrelevant so it functionally cant be that as to why the sub is the default watch for so many.
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition) |
11 August 2018, 07:29 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 116
|
Except for the Daytona it would mean unscrew buttons. Push buttons. Screw buttons in again
|
11 August 2018, 07:30 AM | #15 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 116610LN, 116500LN
Posts: 1,385
|
|
11 August 2018, 07:43 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 116
|
Quote:
Whenever they are in a financial situation and decide to get a Rolex it’s the model they consider the only “real” Rolex. Not thinking of complications, history or even what the instrument was actually made for. They will just be happy that other people will easily know they have a Rolex now. And then the whole thing repeats over and over again. |
|
11 August 2018, 08:06 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,761
|
The BLRO is much harder to obtain at its release than the BLNR, but I think it has more to do with the current scarcity of ss sport models than the desirability of the BLRO. The DaytonaC though seemed to be even more in demand than the BLRO upon release.
|
11 August 2018, 08:07 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Wayne
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,407
|
The insanity increases every year
|
11 August 2018, 08:10 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Doha
Posts: 2,065
|
I personally like the look of the 3 subdials on the chrono watches. Add to that the contrast in color (e.g. The panda look or the silver rings on the black) and the design becomes much more appealing to me. Regarding sub vs. Black GMT, I think the reason the black GMT is not popular is the fact that there has always been "iconic" GMTs around such as the Pepsi, coke, root beer...etc, but for the sub, black has always been the iconic color
|
11 August 2018, 08:12 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 104
|
The US economy is doing very well. Next downturn in the economy and you will be able to get any Rolex within a reasonable amount of time. I personally know several people who are wearing Rolexes that literally can't afford health insurance but buy the watch anyway. I could be wrong....only time will tell.
|
11 August 2018, 08:13 AM | #21 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 3,411
|
Quote:
Hate to sound like such a simpleton here, but this really boils down to basic supply and demand... 1. Demand continues grow. On a macroeconomic level, we've been full steam ahead with engines roaring out of the last crisis. While there has been plenty of noise in the stock market over the past 2 years, we've been generally more and more in the green as time elapses in this run. If you don't trust that as a barometer, look elsewhere. U.S. consumer savings rates have decreased to 3.1% of disposable income (down from ~5.5% about the time the Daytona C was first announced). U.S. auto volumes aren't slowing down after already reaching all-time highs (one of the companies our firm owns is a Tier 1 OEM supplier; we track this data very closely). List goes on and on regarding people just spending more money relative to a few years ago. Forget the hard-to-get flashy new Rolex models for a second. I guarantee you the demand for a standard Sub is higher today than it was when the DaytonaC or BLNR were announced. A rising tide lifts all the boats -- so this general growth in demand is only further magnifying the issue with popular models. 2. Supply constraints on SS professional models. I obviously can't throw statistics around on this, but from the collective anecdotal information on this forum (regarding availability, wait-lists, "my AD told me..", etc.) it just sounds like ADs are getting less of SS sports models that we all love. I highly doubt Rolex is producing less professional line watches on an absolute basis (i.e., X subs in 2018 is less than Y subs in 2017), but clearly there is a noticeable disconnect and supply growth is being outpaced by demand growth at an increasing rate. If they actually are producing less on an absolute basis, that disconnect grows larger. If you tried to normalize for these differences, my guess would be the BLRO has had a very similar level of positive reception/demand to the Daytona C. The higher grey prices (higher asking prices on an absolute basis and much higher on a relative/% of MSRP basis) than the Daytona is probably due more so to the issues outlined above rather than it being a more "popular" or "wanted" watch. I wasn't tracking watches or the industry as closely when the BLNR was first announced. I'm sure others can add much more color on that one. From some of what I've seen here on threads though, it almost sounds like that watch had mixed-reception initially (regardless of the "new" factor) and was one you could pull out straight from an AD's display case for awhile (i.e., it was never like the Daytona C). |
|
11 August 2018, 11:03 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Asia
Watch: Explorer 214270
Posts: 149
|
For some, a Chronograph is a useful tool, yes you can time with your iPhone and submariner bezel, but a push of button is MUCH easier and discreet (even with screwed down pusher) than the bezel and iPhone app. I do use the Chronograph quite often and I believe others too
|
11 August 2018, 11:46 AM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Arizona
Posts: 444
|
Quote:
|
|
11 August 2018, 11:48 AM | #24 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: California
Posts: 3,133
|
Don't recall when the BLNR came out, but I got mine Q3 2014... walked into an AD, 1st purchase from them (at discount) walked out with it. Long way to answer that the landscape was completely different...
BLNR Available at discount from AD --> BLRO Not available from AD and > 2x MSRP from Grey... |
11 August 2018, 12:24 PM | #25 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Far Far Away
Watch: tick-tock
Posts: 1,206
|
BLRO released at the different time then BLNR. The market for SS models was already short. According to my AD BLRO is more desirable than Daytona C at the moment.
|
11 August 2018, 02:14 PM | #26 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Stephen
Location: Beach
Watch: 16660
Posts: 9,424
|
Quote:
Similar story for me as well. In August 2014, I walked into an AD in a major city and got to choose between the BLNR and the SDc. Both were available in the case. Times were different back then.
__________________
"Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." --- RWE |
|
11 August 2018, 05:19 PM | #27 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 116
|
Quote:
Availability = Rolex supply policy x global economic situation x desirability of particular model All factors leading to the BLRO situation today |
|
11 August 2018, 06:51 PM | #28 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,006
|
Quote:
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
|
11 August 2018, 07:40 PM | #29 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
The genuine demand for the D500 and BLRO is very similar but the flipper demand for the BLRO is so much higher as the market is hyped up now. BLNR was a pretty normal release.
|
11 August 2018, 08:08 PM | #30 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Dan
Location: Benelux
Posts: 1,920
|
Quote:
Chrono's that appeal to me usually have a racing heritage. My first 'nice' watch was a Tag Heuer just because I associated it with racing (unfortunately stolen now). Chrono's are also associated with other cool mechanical and manly things like fighter planes/pilots. The coolest chrono in this category for me personally would be a Swedish Air Force military issued Lemania "Viggen". GMT is also a pilot's watch but more for the sophisticated traveller imao. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.