ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 August 2018, 07:54 AM | #61 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Florida
Posts: 635
|
Disappointing
|
21 August 2018, 08:44 AM | #62 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Far Far Away
Watch: tick-tock
Posts: 1,206
|
just checked - my looks not crooked. wonder if Rolex outsourced BLNR production in China
|
21 August 2018, 12:51 PM | #63 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,529
|
The RSC can replace your crystal at no charge if the watch is under warranty.
|
21 August 2018, 01:06 PM | #64 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Real Name: Archie
Location: Washington, DC
Watch: TT DJ 1601
Posts: 359
|
Congrats and welcome to the forum. It is NOT aligned as it should be. Only you will notice...but if it drives you crazy, send it back to be corrected. You spent a lot of $ and it should be right! I could not live with it
|
21 August 2018, 01:30 PM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: norcal
Posts: 3,031
|
Looks crooked but could be one of those rare defects, maybe I'd just keep it just to brag about the defect on your Rolex.
|
21 August 2018, 01:56 PM | #66 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 21
|
Quote:
So I sent it into RSC. The cyclops was fixed, but they somehow scratched up the top edge of the rehaut in the process of fixing it. (Think - scraping the wheel of your car along a curb) Since it was a 2 week old watch, the AD ended up swapping out the head of the watch (kept the original bracelet) with a new one. Now the new watch has a crooked dial (misaligned with rehaut) and a piece of dust on the dial under the crystal. Recently, the seconds hand keeps moving when changing time in 3rd position (only happens a third of the time). But hey....probably the most accurate watch I own. Gains about 0.3 seconds a day. Bottom line is I’ve learned my lesson. Don’t open up the watch unless you have to. I’ll send it in before my warranty expires and hope I have a better experience with RSC. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
21 August 2018, 05:13 PM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,643
|
So your AD has given you a new watch ?? Did they switch everything except the bracelet ?
Does this no longer match your paperwork as it would presumably have a different serial number unless your papers were also changed too.
__________________
“My tastes are simple; I am easily satisfied with the best.” ― Winston S. Churchill |
21 August 2018, 05:56 PM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Uk
Watch: ALS 1815 up & down
Posts: 29
|
What the hell is Rolex playing at?
They are embarrassing themselves. |
21 August 2018, 06:24 PM | #69 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
|
It is possible that the entire crystal is slightly turned, possibly when the caseback is given a final tighten. Not uncommon to be honest. Not to be mistaken for all out drunken cyclops glueing!
Saddening to hear the OP is having a rough time with this..
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
21 August 2018, 06:33 PM | #70 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,797
|
Quote:
I'd be kicking off big time and (now) asking for a full replacement after the issues you've had.
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green. |
|
21 August 2018, 07:51 PM | #71 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: Me Now
Posts: 858
|
Quote:
|
|
21 August 2018, 08:07 PM | #72 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Tim
Location: Holland
Watch: Patek
Posts: 177
|
Get it fixed it is not good
|
21 August 2018, 11:39 PM | #73 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 21
|
Quote:
I think AD could probably sell the new bracelet. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
21 August 2018, 11:40 PM | #74 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 21
|
Quote:
They redid the paper work. So new warranty card that matches the new serial. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
22 August 2018, 12:23 AM | #75 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Richie
Location: "Nowhere Man"
Watch: out now,take care!
Posts: 29,770
|
Holy smokes. Wonder who's going to get your old watch.
__________________
"I love to work at nothing all day" TRF #139960 |
22 August 2018, 01:31 AM | #76 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 5,287
|
Wow, what a disappointing experience. Nonetheless, try to enjoy your watch. Its a beautiful reference.
|
22 August 2018, 01:37 AM | #77 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 21
|
Thought about this too... My guess is that if they were able to fix it up, they might’ve sold it to a grey who would then sell it as a used watch (hopefully with a discount from MSRP) to someone desperate for a BLNR. In today’s climate, I wouldn’t be surprised what people would put up with to get their hands on a hard to find watch. Someone will want it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
22 August 2018, 01:55 AM | #78 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: IL
Watch: I like watch
Posts: 753
|
I know they are mass produced but you spend that kind of money everything should be right. I would send it back.
|
22 August 2018, 05:30 AM | #79 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Tom
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: Sub 14060 "D"
Posts: 108
|
Quote:
WOW! I sent my 20-year old automatic Seiko in for service recently for a lube/cleaning and now runs and looks like new (runs within 1-second a day!)....all for $80.00. For this to be happening to a multi-thousand dollar Rolex is bizare, to say the least. I would demand a brand new watch after your fiasco.................... |
|
22 August 2018, 06:04 AM | #80 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 127
|
Funny how I posted similar and a large amount of the responses where the loupe bandwagon defending them for being "assembled by hand" but at the same time "mass produced" as though that somehow justifies easily avoided manufacturer errors.
I think the amount of these topics recently shows this is not an uncommon issue. I viewed the selection of datejusts in an AD window recently and about 40% had crooked cyclops. From what I have seen, experienced and read , there QC is slipping whether you like it or not and we shouldn't accept it in the name of some brand loyalty. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.