The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 January 2009, 02:13 PM   #31
cody p
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: Air-King 114200
Posts: 2,878
the exp II is due for something (possibly a new case/triplock), so is the exp I, for that matter.
cody p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2009, 02:19 PM   #32
shedlock2000
2024 Pledge Member
 
shedlock2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: Canada
Watch: 16753; Bellini Dia
Posts: 1,770
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolexitis View Post
WHOA!! I'm all for that but without PCL's...
What he said.........twice! : lol:
__________________
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it.


SS Submariner no date 1992 (sold); SS GMT II 2007 (sold); SS GMT II C 2008 ('M' series) (sold); SS Sub C 2011 (sold); BB GMT 1971 (sold); Omega 50th GMT
shedlock2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2009, 02:22 PM   #33
shedlock2000
2024 Pledge Member
 
shedlock2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: Canada
Watch: 16753; Bellini Dia
Posts: 1,770
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe100 View Post
This:



Or i quit!

Friend of mine found this pic somewhere and sent it to me and I've been drooling ever since. Total fantasy but I do like the black date wheel with white numbers.

Best regards,

J.

Im flipping my GMT IIc, back to a proper GMT II, as i just cant stick the 'clown like' 'mickey mouse' bezel numbers..........all that said, with the colour of this and the other 'mock coke GMt IIc' they look great.

I want one......I NEED ONE.......NURSE!!! Medication please!!!
__________________
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it.


SS Submariner no date 1992 (sold); SS GMT II 2007 (sold); SS GMT II C 2008 ('M' series) (sold); SS Sub C 2011 (sold); BB GMT 1971 (sold); Omega 50th GMT
shedlock2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2009, 03:10 PM   #34
rodal
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: spokane
Posts: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by abolomey View Post
Hi guys,
Looking at the process how this ceramic bezel insert is made, the only way to have a two tone will be making two halves separately... I doubt they will be able to make it in one piece. It will be like trying to make a black and white chocolate cake, and expect to have two perfect halves.
I work in a company which has a foundry, so I have some expertise in iron based alloys... I know this is different, but you can expect what to get from materials that fusion at high temperatures like this one.
This is just my opinion, but Rolex is Rolex, and maybe they have the technology to accomplish the task...

Regards,
Alfredo
The ceramic bezel is NOT made by Rolex but a company belonging to the Swatch Group - the same company produces the Rado ceramic components....
rodal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2009, 04:54 PM   #35
mattyo
"TRF" Member
 
mattyo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt O
Location: Melbourne
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 143
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe100 View Post
This:



Or i quit!

Friend of mine found this pic somewhere and sent it to me and I've been drooling ever since. Total fantasy but I do like the black date wheel with white numbers.

Best regards,

J.
i'd take 2.. nice!
mattyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2009, 09:47 PM   #36
escudoturbo
"TRF" Member
 
escudoturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Baz
Location: U.K
Watch: Explorer II
Posts: 364
New explorer II with GMT style bezel in stainless and new crown guards. Explorer I to get a big change, new dial colours for DJ.
escudoturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2009, 10:16 PM   #37
Jimbits76
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 9,407
TT sub ceramic.

DJ's with classic more traditional dials instead of 08's travestys.

Lot of rumours last years about an updated Explorer II but it didn't show. I'm gonna call it that we wont see it this year.

No Ceramic GMT Pepsi or Coke. Which is a good thing as I have time to save up for one.

Perhaps they might surprise us with something a little left field....

I wouldn't bet against a return of the Newman style dials for the SS Cos.

J
Jimbits76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2009, 10:38 PM   #38
Quicksilver
"TRF" Member
 
Quicksilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: David
Location: London+Guangzhou
Watch: ing watches
Posts: 2,603
I would love to see that GMT IIc Pepsi. Despite the PCL's that would seriously tempt me to part with some cash. I think we will see it at Basel.

Agree with Jimbits about some of the 08 travesty DJ dials. Keep DJ's classic
__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M.
Quicksilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2009, 11:37 PM   #39
yannis
"TRF" Member
 
yannis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Yannis
Location: Europe
Watch: maniac
Posts: 9,070
I don't see why Rolex shouldn't come up with a Pepsi and Coke ceramic unless it involves breaking the laws of physics i.e it is not possible to make one. Still let us hope that some alchemy or magic on their part will do the trick; only negative aspect of this is that this may lead us having even bigger holes in our pockets or our kids and wives starving to death. I am a bit concerned about the kids to be honest!! (runs for cover!!!)
__________________
Rolex Submariner 116610LV | Tudor 79220N



yannis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2009, 11:50 PM   #40
Jimbits76
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 9,407
Supposedly it does involve breaking the laws of physics.

The bezel before firing is extremely plastic and the colours bleed into each other.

Apart from fixing two seperate colours together I cannot see how they will acheieve this....well apart from opening a couple of tins of humbrol paint and some clear lacquer!!!!!!

J
Jimbits76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2009, 11:57 PM   #41
Jimbits76
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 9,407
By coincidence just had an email from a good friend and vintage Rolex parts dealer.

He says he saw his grey dealer this weekend and they informed him that the rumours are that Rolex have a Pepsi and Coke prototype yet will nit put it into production yet.

Think about it. How much would sales of the GMTIIc (black) drop off if they released a Pepsi or Coke version too soon????????

Ooooh a bit of intrigue and rumour mongering!

J
Jimbits76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 12:01 AM   #42
yannis
"TRF" Member
 
yannis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Yannis
Location: Europe
Watch: maniac
Posts: 9,070
Making two separate pieces is the only way then...i think this could be possible like some others said. It surely is not simple but it should be possible this way.
__________________
Rolex Submariner 116610LV | Tudor 79220N



yannis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 12:05 AM   #43
yannis
"TRF" Member
 
yannis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Yannis
Location: Europe
Watch: maniac
Posts: 9,070
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbits76 View Post
By coincidence just had an email from a good friend and vintage Rolex parts dealer.

He says he saw his grey dealer this weekend and they informed him that the rumours are that Rolex have a Pepsi and Coke prototype yet will nit put it into production yet.

Think about it. How much would sales of the GMTIIc (black) drop off if they released a Pepsi or Coke version too soon????????

Ooooh a bit of intrigue and rumour mongering!

J
It makes some sense. On the other hand more choices could equally benefit Rolex.
__________________
Rolex Submariner 116610LV | Tudor 79220N



yannis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 12:32 AM   #44
Darren Retour
"TRF" Member
 
Darren Retour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Bexley Kent
Watch: Bluesy M
Posts: 141
Does this mean that the 16613 will be taken out of production like the 16710 ??

Cant wait to see a TT Ceramic Sub

Darren
Darren Retour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 02:37 AM   #45
mic6
"TRF" Member
 
mic6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Europe
Watch: 116718 green
Posts: 1,944
1. TT ceramic sub
2. Bicolor ceramic bezel for SS GMT II
3. Supercased solid gold daytona
__________________
mic6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 03:43 AM   #46
JohnEaton
"TRF" Member
 
JohnEaton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John Eaton
Location: Nome Alaska USA
Watch: Red1680 metres 1st
Posts: 1,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe100 View Post
...and for those of you who like black/red...



Oh please Rolex, please...

J.
OOOHHHHHHH !!!!!!!!

That's what I want (need)

Like I need another watch, I though I had all I need...

Rolex you will drive me to the poor house
__________________
Perfection lies not in the organic whole but in the isolated fragment
JohnEaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 03:46 AM   #47
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
There are going to be a lot of watches there.
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 03:54 AM   #48
The Mole
"TRF" Member
 
The Mole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bay Area
Watch: 116520
Posts: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by rodal View Post
The ceramic bezel is NOT made by Rolex but a company belonging to the Swatch Group - the same company produces the Rado ceramic components....
Source?
__________________
The Mole
"Time is inseparable from existence for us ... It enables the real world not simply to be, but to become."
Prof. Albert Facquard
Inaugural Conference of the 12th International Chronometer Congress, October 2004.
The Mole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 04:29 AM   #49
rescue7
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Rescueguy
Location: Here
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 1,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Mole View Post
Source?
I was under the impression that only the 904L S/S is NOT manufactured by Rolex, it's the only material that they outsource., they want to control all aspects of production. Maybe they do own the Steel maker as well.

BTW gotta love some of the input from fellow posters, keep it coming folkes!

Maybe Rolex should consult the Swatch company on how to perfect the bi-color bezel manufacturing process.
rescue7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2009, 01:16 AM   #50
joe100
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
A very good friend of mine is a ceramics development engineer. Last night I picked his brain about the two-tone bezel. From what he said, the main reason they're having problems (or had problems) is that the two ceramic colors will need to be fired at two different temperatures. So if you fire it as a single piece, one side is overheated or under-heated respectively. He said it's not out of the realm of possibility but that it would be exceedingly difficult to fire it as one. (Although he did go on to say that Rolex may be up to something that he doesn't yet know about)

He said the best way to create a bezel like this would be to make the red and blue halves separately, join them with a steel ring behind them to hold the shape, then glaze them and re-fire. From what I gather, this would make the seam almost, if not completely invisible. But he also stressed this would be pretty expensive.

Best regards,

Joe
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 January 2009, 05:27 PM   #51
rodal
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: spokane
Posts: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Mole View Post
Source?
Internet of course - if you search long enough you will find that the company making the ceramic parts for Rolex is G. Ruedin SA from Bassecourt and belongs to the Swatch Group
rodal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 January 2009, 07:11 PM   #52
Rob_b
"TRF" Member
 
Rob_b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Rob
Location: Brisbane AUS
Watch: SeaDweller
Posts: 850
Quote:
Originally Posted by rodal View Post
Internet of course - if you search long enough you will find that the company making the ceramic parts for Rolex is G. Ruedin SA from Bassecourt and belongs to the Swatch Group
Thanks rodal, you just saved me a lot of googling

Rob
__________________


Travelling Through Time at The Speed of Life.
Rob_b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2009, 08:28 AM   #53
steve j
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 2
Pardon me for just dropping in, but after being here a while and reading the posts i want to say hello and perhaps add a thought.

While i think that Rolex would prefer a solid one piece bezel, there is another option. In this day and age, there are incredibly strong bonding agents such as epoxies that, when cured, will become almost as strong as the materials it is joining. And in some instances, possibly stronger. Perhaps the bi-color bezel can be made as a two piece unit that is notched then epoxied, fitted and cured. Just a thought. But if Rolex wants, it will find a solution.
steve j is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.