ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

B. Doggy · 28 December 2008, 09:16 AM

So how much "smaller" does the 44mm Lum really wear compared to the 45mm Rad?

I'm getting pretty close to pulling the trigger on the Rad and would appreciate everyone's

. I know so many of you out there that have both and I am really not wanting to drive the 2-hours to my AD right now. Plus I have nailed down a pretty good deal on a 183

Thanks!

tuisquash · 28 December 2008, 09:59 AM

the rad seems smaller because it's lighter and thinner.
feels better at the wrist.
I have 2 lum, but asap i'll buy a 183.

bigmikebee · 29 December 2008, 03:51 PM

im close to a deal on a rad.... imo - its wears "smaller" then the luminor....

VazLube · 29 December 2008, 05:54 PM

Wear both Lum and Rad at AD and feel and see the difference. No amount of words on forum will convey the experience of wearing both Rad and Lum!

Trurolexer · 10 January 2009, 12:34 AM

I like BOTH. But my favorite is 232, and yes Rads for me, please.

agreenberg77 · 10 January 2009, 05:01 AM

I dig them both, but yes the rad does wear smaller....unless its platinum :)

bigmikebee · 10 January 2009, 02:29 PM

i made a deal on a rad 287 last week......now that i wear it on a regular basis. i believe is wears smaller for sure. and i got a great deal on it too.

28 December 2008, 09:16 AM	#1
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	Lum vs. Rad So how much "smaller" does the 44mm Lum really wear compared to the 45mm Rad? I'm getting pretty close to pulling the trigger on the Rad and would appreciate everyone's . I know so many of you out there that have both and I am really not wanting to drive the 2-hours to my AD right now. Plus I have nailed down a pretty good deal on a 183 Thanks!

28 December 2008, 09:59 AM	#2
tuisquash "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: tui Location: são paulo-brasil Watch: panerai rolex Posts: 772	the rad seems smaller because it's lighter and thinner. feels better at the wrist. I have 2 lum, but asap i'll buy a 183. __________________ panerai and rolex

29 December 2008, 03:51 PM	#3
bigmikebee "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: USA Posts: 359	im close to a deal on a rad.... imo - its wears "smaller" then the luminor....

29 December 2008, 05:54 PM	#4
VazLube Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: South of Equator Posts: 278	Wear both Lum and Rad at AD and feel and see the difference. No amount of words on forum will convey the experience of wearing both Rad and Lum!

10 January 2009, 12:34 AM	#5
Trurolexer Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: USA Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex Posts: 18,421	I like BOTH. But my favorite is 232, and yes Rads for me, please.

10 January 2009, 05:01 AM	#6
agreenberg77 Banned Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: miami Posts: 29	I dig them both, but yes the rad does wear smaller....unless its platinum :)

10 January 2009, 02:29 PM	#7
bigmikebee "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: USA Posts: 359	i made a deal on a rad 287 last week......now that i wear it on a regular basis. i believe is wears smaller for sure. and i got a great deal on it too.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)