The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 February 2019, 05:58 AM   #1
oldman2005
"TRF" Member
 
oldman2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: norcal
Posts: 3,031
Rolex giving up SS sport watch market to other manufactures such as Omega,...?

The other day, I dropped by my favourite AD just to chitchat a bit and collect some Rolex magazines, of course as usual the AD had nothing in SS sport. An asian couple walked in and I overheard them asking for a SS Submariner and I was not surprised that they walked out empty handed. We shopped around and later on dropped by a huge watch retailer in the same mall that carries everything from Patek, JLC, to Omega and other brands. We walked to the Omega display and met the same couple at the Rolex AD, they were in process of purchasing a new Omega Seamaster 300.

The lower priced stainless steel sport watch market competition is fierce with so many brands, do you think that Rolex is giving up this market segment and move to higher priced higher profit margin of DJ/TT/PM and leaving this stainless steel market for others to feed on?

Many even think the new Omega Seamaster is a better watch than the Submariner:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9vhi5-dZSQ
oldman2005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 06:05 AM   #2
THC
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
THC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Tom
Location: Mandeville La
Watch: 126333
Posts: 10,666
No and No
THC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 06:09 AM   #3
Mystro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,514
Certainly if there isn’t a Rolex in the case and a buyer wants/needs a new watch, they will be buying another brand. It’s just a watch and most would never wait a few months to purchase a SS watch. Omega has to be seeing stronger sales. Being better or not is meaningless if Rolex doesn’t show up to be considered in the purchase process. Rolex loses these sales by their own strategy. Normal buyers won’t be bothered by the buying process for a Rolex. Remember to the sane world...”It’s just a watch”.
Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 06:11 AM   #4
ryvius
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: SoCal
Posts: 27
Honestly the scarcity makes Rolex more of a challenge and therefore more desirable.
ryvius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 06:19 AM   #5
Harry-57
2024 Pledge Member
 
Harry-57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Harry
Location: England
Posts: 10,681
Rolex are selling as many SS sport watches as they want to make. And, until we definitively hear different, which of course we never will, we can safely assume that they are producing as many SS sport models as they ever have. Just look at the ocean of grey offerings, many with the plastic still on.

That they do not appear to be knee jerking to the exponential demand, says more about their confidence and long term plans for brand protection than it does about "giving up".

Seamaster better than Submariner? Subjective. I like Omega. I like their styles. I have a very nice Speedie. But I don't think their quality comes close to Rolex. I suppose it's a matter of opinion.
Harry-57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 06:20 AM   #6
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
no
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches
current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 06:23 AM   #7
burnthesehills
"TRF" Member
 
burnthesehills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: Joe
Location: Western MA
Posts: 1,211
If you want a Rolex, you’ll never be happy with simply an Omega. You’ll either wait for the Rolex or end up buying both.
burnthesehills is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 06:24 AM   #8
SLS
"TRF" Member
 
SLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
Sounds like the couple settled in my opinion, which is never good when it comes to buying a watch. I learned that settling, regardless of what you purchase, just leaves you longing all that much more. Nothing against Omega, but a SeaMaster is not a Sub and vice versa.
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin

Member No. 922
SLS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 06:25 AM   #9
mistercoach32
"TRF" Member
 
mistercoach32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: SD43
Posts: 894
Absolutely not
mistercoach32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 06:25 AM   #10
SLS
"TRF" Member
 
SLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by burnthesehills View Post
If you want a Rolex, you’ll never be happy with simply an Omega. You’ll either wait for the Rolex or end up buying both.
Ha, you beat me to it!
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin

Member No. 922
SLS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 06:26 AM   #11
RHIII
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Roger
Location: ...
Watch: AP/Rolex/PP
Posts: 6,309
Absolutely not


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RHIII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 06:29 AM   #12
Spartacus
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: DC
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 2,745
Unable to buy a Sub, I purchased a Pelagos.

So I am an example of a transaction lost, I could have just as easily picked up an Omega.

I must say, if I’m left without the Rolex option, I’ll be looking at brands like Omega as an alternative.

Being laughed away or on some fictional list is not desirable to me.
Spartacus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 06:45 AM   #13
VanAdian
"TRF" Member
 
VanAdian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: WA, USA
Watch: DSOTM
Posts: 588
The idea that Rolex is somehow losing out on business because of personal and/or anecdotal inability to find a SS piece is misguided. Rolex couldn’t care less about you not being able to find the watch you want. They are making and selling just as many as they want to. Trying to find some justification for them to stop SS production at this point is absurd.
__________________
DSOTM - Railmaster - JLC DuoFace - Pelagos LHD - Sinn 556

"The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time." - B. Russell
VanAdian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 06:54 AM   #14
Geaux Tigers
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: USA
Watch: SS Sub Date
Posts: 439
No doubt they are loosing some sales, but they are also selling all they make. Twenty years ago I bought an Ebel rather than a Rolex, but eventually came back to buy the Submariner then BLNR with more to come. As a new collector the scarcity is frustrating, but I won’t pay over MSRP nor be a party to panic buying. Slow and steady always wins in the end for buying and production...
Geaux Tigers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 07:06 AM   #15
Late
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Edge of Sanity
Watch: space too short
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystro View Post
Certainly if there isn’t a Rolex in the case and a buyer wants/needs a new watch, they will be buying another brand. It’s just a watch and most would never wait a few months to purchase a SS watch. Omega has to be seeing stronger sales.
That's wishful thinking. While "luxury" watches in the U.S. went up across the board over the last 18 months, Omega sales numbers have been relatively flat.

In the over-$5K range, divide the market into three pieces:

  • "Fashion" brands (expensive brands without deep watch roots e.g. Jimmy Choo, Michael Kors) are way down.
  • Most of the rest had slight increases as the overall market expanded 15% (evenly split - +14% $5-10K, +16% $10K+)
  • Rolex and Patek Philippe have gained a lot; NPD has those two together at 70% of the $10K+ U.S. market. And Grand Seiko has entered the Top-10 in the $5K-$10K range.

Omega and other Swatch brands are doing really well in Asia, but relatively flat in the U.S.

FWIW, Patek Philippe's success is a surprise to me too. I like the Calatrava, but the 5196G variant, close to a Stowa Antea or Nomos Orion in many ways, is about 10 times more expensive, close to $20K, outside of my viewscope.
Late is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 07:13 AM   #16
t65tampa
"TRF" Member
 
t65tampa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,262
I think the watch market is responding just the way Rolex wants it to. Maybe Omega will pick up some scraps, but the purchaser who is set on a Rolex will not likely be satisfied with something else.
__________________
t65tampa
t65tampa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 07:16 AM   #17
dtwer
"TRF" Member
 
dtwer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: midwest
Watch: DJ 41
Posts: 1,507
Rolex moving upmarket = Maybe; only because of demand driving up prices
Rolex giving up SS market = No
Seamaster better than Submariner = ROFLMAO!
dtwer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 07:26 AM   #18
Krash
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Krash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub, DJ41, GMT
Posts: 8,268
Omegas always look like they’re as good or better than Rolex on the internet. In person, it’s completely different. Rolex is king.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Krash is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 07:33 AM   #19
007_Omega
"TRF" Member
 
007_Omega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Galaxy
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 905
Rolex is cementing itself in the luxury market. It's not about simply being able to afford the watch anymore but rather going through the hoops to obtain one. The desire and exclusivity bring people to the brand.

Rolex is certainly going upmarket and don't let anyone tell you otherwise. Rolex wants no comparison to its old traditional competition like Breitling or Omega. Those brands hand you whatever watch you want, except the occasional Speedy Tuesday/Ultraman which are mostly bought by resellers anyway.

Rolex knows the writing is on the wall for watches being tools. That doesn't mean they are giving up SS sports model but rather SS sports models are their precious jewelry.

Another way to look at it, I think this is a feasible theory, is that Rolex is looking at things from the big picture and they even think they are in a bubble. They do not want to flood the market to meet demand because when the bubble ends those watches will flood the aftermarket and then devalue the brand. Omega has certainly devalued their brand by overproducing watches when most of their catalogue is available for a 40% discount.
007_Omega is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 07:40 AM   #20
Art 1
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krash View Post
Omegas always look like they’re as good or better than Rolex on the internet. In person, it’s completely different. Rolex is king.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I feel the opposite, to me Omega looks much nicer in person than in a catalogue.
Art 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 07:53 AM   #21
Junior_
"TRF" Member
 
Junior_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: John
Location: Ohio
Watch: Rolex 114060
Posts: 658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus View Post
Unable to buy a Sub, I purchased a Pelagos.

So I am an example of a transaction lost, I could have just as easily picked up an Omega.

I must say, if I’m left without the Rolex option, I’ll be looking at brands like Omega as an alternative.

Being laughed away or on some fictional list is not desirable to me.


For me personally, it was a Sub or nothing. The Pelagos is a great watch. It just isn’t the Sub.

If I couldn’t have gotten a Sub from an AD, I would have went grey, not settled for a Pelagos.

If you wanted the Pelagos, great. But it’s not the same.
Junior_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 08:13 AM   #22
MSchott
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Michigan
Posts: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by Late View Post
That's wishful thinking. While "luxury" watches in the U.S. went up across the board over the last 18 months, Omega sales numbers have been relatively flat.

In the over-$5K range, divide the market into three pieces:

  • "Fashion" brands (expensive brands without deep watch roots e.g. Jimmy Choo, Michael Kors) are way down.
  • Most of the rest had slight increases as the overall market expanded 15% (evenly split - +14% $5-10K, +16% $10K+)
  • Rolex and Patek Philippe have gained a lot; NPD has those two together at 70% of the $10K+ U.S. market. And Grand Seiko has entered the Top-10 in the $5K-$10K range.

Omega and other Swatch brands are doing really well in Asia, but relatively flat in the U.S.

FWIW, Patek Philippe's success is a surprise to me too. I like the Calatrava, but the 5196G variant, close to a Stowa Antea or Nomos Orion in many ways, is about 10 times more expensive, close to $20K, outside of my viewscope.
Do you have inside information on Omega’s sales figures in the US?
MSchott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 08:16 AM   #23
MSchott
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Michigan
Posts: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krash View Post
Omegas always look like they’re as good or better than Rolex on the internet. In person, it’s completely different. Rolex is king.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Depends on individual tastes. In my experience Omega watches are attractive and very well made. There are many Rolex models I could easily walk away from. The DSSD is one due to that stupid rehaut.
MSchott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 08:18 AM   #24
cajerseyboy
"TRF" Member
 
cajerseyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Northern Cal
Watch: me find "the one"
Posts: 747
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus View Post
Unable to buy a Sub, I purchased a Pelagos.

So I am an example of a transaction lost, I could have just as easily picked up an Omega.

I must say, if I’m left without the Rolex option, I’ll be looking at brands like Omega as an alternative.

Being laughed away or on some fictional list is not desirable to me.


Tudor is owned by Rolex so they did not lose out on a sale.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
116610LN 216570 116710BLNR 116610LV 116500LN 116519LN
cajerseyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 08:19 AM   #25
Etschell
"TRF" Member
 
Etschell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
Omega is competing more win brands like Tudor. And I think that is what omega is at this point.
__________________
If you wind it, they will run.

25 or 6 to 4.
Etschell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 08:20 AM   #26
Chaching
"TRF" Member
 
Chaching's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: None of ya #@!
Location: Somewhere
Watch: Many! 116718 GOLD
Posts: 2,137
Ha! NO
Chaching is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 08:26 AM   #27
MSchott
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Michigan
Posts: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by Etschell View Post
Omega is competing more win brands like Tudor. And I think that is what omega is at this point.
Nothing against Tudor but you need to take another look at Omega’s current product line. Mostly in house movements including a Chrono movement equal to that in the Daytona.
MSchott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 08:26 AM   #28
emtee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Real Name: Matt
Location: UK
Posts: 1,251
For enthusiasts like us no. We are clued up and we know what want. However I can totally see the casual buyer with a few grand in the pocket who fancies picking up a sub, being told no and going over the street and buying a Seamaster instead just to scratch the itch.

I mean the amount of times I’ve gone to buy a paticular item of clothing and got something else just because they didn’t have my size and i wanted something there and then

Edit: However I would add I usually end up buying something more expensive than I intended to in that situation just to make myself feel better. Which is slightly different than going from sub to seamaster
emtee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 08:30 AM   #29
JR16
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 6,253
Quote:
Originally Posted by MSchott View Post
Nothing against Tudor but you need to take another look at Omega’s current product line. Mostly in house movements including a Chrono movement equal to that in the Daytona.


Have to agree, would place Omega above Tudor in the pecking order.

To those above who think Rolex “lost out on a sale”, I think this is laughable- Rolex is selling all the divers they are making so they aren’t losing out at all. If they wanted to sell more, they would make more. But they don’t, so they aren’t.
JR16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2019, 08:31 AM   #30
hbombkid
"TRF" Member
 
hbombkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: VA
Watch: Sub 116610
Posts: 1,082
Ha no

I love omega started with a planet ocean, biggest gripe I have with Omega is the new prices are way to high for the value.

Best thing I like about them is availability and almost every model could be found new for about 30% off and preowned even better than that. I would never buy one for msrp. I just picked up a 2500 AT for a great price. It goes nice with my sub.

Rolex the marketing is just much stronger. There is no way the quality of a PO 8500 is 4500 less than a sub, (if you are trying to at least compare apples to apples) but the prices say that today and owning the sub I am ok with that
hbombkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.